HomeReports › Dauphin County, Pennsylvania

Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Court Filings Intelligence

Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Dauphin County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-12. See methodology.

Data current as of 2026-07-09 · refreshes nightly #10 of 18 Pennsylvania counties we cover by filing volume
Investor takeaway

About Dauphin County

Dauphin County is a county in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. As of the 2020 census, the population was 286,401. The county seat is Harrisburg, Pennsylvania's state capital and ninth-most populous city. The county was created on March 4, 1785, from part of Lancaster County and was named after Louis Joseph, Dauphin of France, the first son of King Louis XVI. Dauphin County is included in the Harrisburg–Carlisle Metropolitan Statistical Area. Located within the county is Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, site of the 1979 nuclear core meltdown. The nuclear power plant closed in 2019

Source: Wikipedia

Get Dauphin County leads delivered daily

Owner names, phone numbers, and property details — the day each case is filed. 7-day free trial.

See Dauphin County Leads →

At a glance

1239 verified property-related court filings tracked across 20 months (Jan 2023 to Jul 2026).

64 typical monthly filing volume.

#10 of 18 Pennsylvania counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.

2% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (19 of 1239 filings).

$106,900 median estimated property value across the 932 filings with property-enrichment data (75% coverage).

3.9% Pennsylvania unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.

Filing type breakdown

Filing typeFilingsShare
Partition 847 68.4%
Pre-Foreclosure 314 25.3%
Stalled Project 29 2.3%
Tired Landlord 22 1.8%
Inherited Property 13 1.0%
Pre-Probate 6 0.5%
Divorce 3 0.2%
Quiet Title 3 0.2%
Forced Liquidation 2 0.2%

Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.

Get the full Dauphin County lead list

Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.

Start Free Trial

Monthly filing activity

MonthFilingsvs prior
Jan 2023 32
Feb 2023 86 +54
Mar 2023 100 +14
Oct 2023 40 -60
Nov 2023 81 +41
Dec 2023 63 -18
Oct 2024 66 +3
Nov 2024 73 +7
Dec 2024 75 +2
Jan 2025 3 -72
Feb 2025 80 +77
Mar 2025 98 +18
Jul 2025 32 -66
Aug 2025 91 +59
Sep 2025 78 -13
Mar 2026 1 -77
Apr 2026 97 +96
May 2026 59 -38
Jun 2026 66 +7
Jul 2026 18 -48

Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.

Geographic concentration by ZIP

Top 10 ZIPs in Dauphin County account for 49.7% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.

ZIPCityFilingsShare
17112 Lower Paxton Township 134 10.8%
17104 Harrisburg 103 8.3%
17101 Harrisburg 89 7.2%
17111 Harrisburg 80 6.5%
17102 Harrisburg 65 5.2%
17036 Hummelstown 44 3.6%
17110 Harrisburg 40 3.2%
17109 Lower Paxton Township 34 2.7%
17103 Harrisburg 20 1.6%
17057 Middletown 7 0.6%

Based on filings with a parseable property address (52% of Dauphin County filings).

Target these ZIP codes before your competitors

Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.

See Availability

Property value distribution

Estimated valueFilingsShare
Under $75k 238 25.5%
$75k - $150k 459 49.2%
$150k - $250k 128 13.7%
$250k - $400k 85 9.1%
$400k+ 22 2.4%

Source: third-party property enrichment (75% coverage on Dauphin County filings). Median $106,900; mean $145,684.

Day-of-week filing pattern

DayFilingsShare
Sun 2 0.2%
Mon 217 17.5%
Tue 275 22.2%
Wed 226 18.2%
Thu 225 18.2%
Fri 292 23.6%
Sat 2 0.2%

Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 1239 filings with a parseable date.

Housing stock + distress signals

Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 127259 Dauphin County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.

Indicator Dauphin County US average
Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale)5.9%10.5%
Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage62.1%60.8%
Pre-1940 housing stock19.6%12.3%
Single-family detached share of housing stock49.7%61.2%
Residents age 65 or older17.7%17.3%

Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.

Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)

HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Dauphin County sits within the Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.

Unit size Fair market rent / month
Efficiency / studio$1,058
1-bedroom$1,212
2-bedroom$1,493
3-bedroom$1,920
4-bedroom$1,977

Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.

New construction (market momentum)

Annual building permits filed in Dauphin County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.

Indicator Value
Total housing units permitted (2025)329
Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025)-34.1%
Single-family share of permits (2025)54.7%
Single-family units permitted180
Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building)149

Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.

Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency

Dauphin County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Pennsylvania state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.

IndicatorValuePeriod
Pennsylvania home price index (year-over-year)+5.3%2026-01-01
Pennsylvania home price index (cumulative since 2020)+59.3%2026-01-01
National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family)1.89%2026-01-01

Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series PASTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.

Local-market benchmark

Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:

IndicatorFiling-weighted average
Median household income (where filings cluster)$79,267
Median home value$232,321
Owner-occupancy rate51.3%
Renter share of households48.7%
Median gross rent$1,207/mo

Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 6 top ZIPs.

Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Dauphin County

Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").

PlaintiffForeclosure filings
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 27
U.S. BANK TRUST N.A 20
NEWREZ 15
MIDFIRST BANK 15
U.S. BANK N.A 13
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES 13
WELLS FARGO BANK 12
MEMBERS 1ST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 11
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY 10
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING 9

Source: plaintiff names extracted from Dauphin County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.

FEMA flood zone exposure

Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 600 properties with geocoded locations.

6.0%
in Special Flood Hazard Area
36
properties in high-risk zones
Zone Properties Share
X 551 91.8%
AE 35 5.8%
X-500yr 13 2.2%
A 1 0.2%

Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 600 properties checked.

Filing velocity by case type

How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.

Case type Total Share Trend
Equity Division Sale 817 65.9% +2.9%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 306 24.7% -55.6%
Partition 30 2.4% +42.9%
Stalled Project 29 2.3% -50.0%
Tired Landlord 22 1.8% --
Pre-Foreclosure 8 0.6% --
Inherited Property 8 0.6% --
Pre-Probate 6 0.5% --
Distressed Heir 5 0.4% --

Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.

Lender concentration analysis

Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.

405
HHI score
Competitive
Market type
23.2%
Top 3 share
Lender / Plaintiff Filings Share
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 27 10.1%
US BANK TRUST NA 20 7.5%
NEWREZ 15 5.6%
MIDFIRST BANK 15 5.6%
US BANK NA 13 4.9%

HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 267 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.

Seasonal filing patterns

Court filings peak in Apr and are lowest in Jan. The 5.5x peak-to-trough ratio suggests strong seasonal patterns — investors who time their outreach around Apr can reach more distressed homeowners.

Month Avg filings Relative
Jan 17.5
18%
Feb 83
86%
Mar 66.3
68%
Apr 97
100%
May 59
61%
Jun 66
68%
Jul 32
33%
Aug 91
94%
Sep 78
80%
Oct 53
55%
Nov 77
79%
Dec 69
71%

Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Apr), with a 5.5x peak-to-trough ratio.

ZIP code distress hotspots

Distress is geographically dispersed across 22 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.

ZIP Area Filings Share Median value
17112 Lower Paxton Township 134 10.8% $124,200
17104 Harrisburg 103 8.3% $91,150
17101 Harrisburg 89 7.2% $93,900
17111 Harrisburg 80 6.5% $135,200
17102 Harrisburg 65 5.2% $82,100
17036 Hummelstown 44 3.6% $125,100
17110 Harrisburg 40 3.2% $105,900
17109 Lower Paxton Township 34 2.7% $100,450
17103 Harrisburg 20 1.6% $117,826
17057 Middletown 7 0.6% $170,250

Top 10 of 22 ZIP codes with filings.

Non-resident owner analysis

Most filings (98%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.

1.5%
Non-resident owners
Case type Total filings Non-resident %
Equity Division Sale 817 0.0%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 306 0.0%
Partition 30 13.3%
Stalled Project 29 0.0%
Tired Landlord 22 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 8 100.0%
Inherited Property 8 0.0%
Pre-Probate 6 100.0%
Distressed Heir 5 0.0%

Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.

Distress composition and shifts

Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. High Urgency Pre Foreclosure share is declining.

Case type Recent share Earlier share Shift
Equity Division Sale 68.8% 65.1% +3.7pp
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 12.0% 26.5% -14.5pp (falling)
Pre-Foreclosure 5.6% 0.1% +5.5pp (rising)
Tired Landlord 4.0% 1.6% +2.4pp
Pre-Probate 3.2% 0.2% +3.0pp
Inherited Property 3.2% 0.4% +2.8pp
Divorce 1.6% 0.1% +1.5pp
Forced Liquidation 0.8% 0.1% +0.7pp
Stalled Project 0.8% 2.6% -1.8pp
Partition 0.0% 2.7% -2.7pp
Distressed Heir 0.0% 0.5% -0.5pp
Title Clearance Play 0.0% 0.3% -0.3pp

Distress diversity score: 1.68 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.

Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline

32.0% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 44 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is settled / agreed resolution (177 cases, 45% of resolved).

152
Judgment entered
12.4% of 1228 tracked
1
Default judgment
0.1% of 1228 tracked
177
Settled / agreed resolution
14.4% of 1228 tracked
63
Sheriff sale
5.1% of 1228 tracked
44
Median days to resolution
4–64
25th–75th percentile (days)
393
Cases resolved
Resolution Type Median Days Cases
Judgment 15 15
Detailed disposition breakdown
Disposition Count % of Resolved
Settlement 177 45.0%
Final Judgment 152 38.7%
Sheriff Sale 63 16.0%
Default Judgment 1 0.3%

Outcomes by Case Type

Case Type Cases Resolved Resolution Rate Median Days
Equity Division Sale 820 130 15.9% 68
High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure 311 241 77.5% 55
Stalled Project 29 3 10.3%
Partition 26 7 26.9%
Tired Landlord 22 6 27.3% 15
Inherited Property 8 0 0.0%
Distressed Heir 5 4 80.0%

Based on 1228 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 835 cases are still active or pending resolution.

Property Value Profile

The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $101,500. Pre-Foreclosure filings involve the highest-value properties (median $213,455), while Tired Landlord filings trend lower (median $62,900). The largest segment (49.4%) falls in the Under $100K range.

$101,500
Median assessed value
$139,363
Average assessed value
981
Properties with values
Value range Properties Share
Under $100K 485 49.4%
$100K - $250K 389 39.7%
$250K - $500K 97 9.9%
$500K - $1M 4 0.4%
Over $1M 6 0.6%
Value breakdown by case type
Case type Median value Avg value Properties
Equity Division Sale $103,100 $140,369 623
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure $97,600 $123,865 266
Partition $98,000 $103,983 27
Stalled Project $150,000 $266,433 21
Tired Landlord $62,900 $69,032 19
Pre-Foreclosure $213,455 $289,005 8
Inherited Property $67,300 $88,929 7

Based on county assessor records for 981 properties with court filings (79.2% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.

Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code

Across 15 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 17112 (Harrisburg) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (134 cases). 6 of 15 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 45.

75/100
Highest ZIP score
15
ZIPs scored
45
Average score
Rank ZIP Code Area Score Filings Avg Value Absentee %
#1 17112 Harrisburg
75
134 0%
#2 17104 Harrisburg
67
103 0%
#3 17111 Harrisburg
61
80 0%
#4 17101 Harrisburg
60
89 0%
#5 17102 Harrisburg
57
65 0%
#6 17110 Harrisburg
47
40 0%
#7 17036 Hummelstown
43
44 0%
#8 17109 Harrisburg
41
34 0%
#9 17103 Harrisburg
40
20 0%
#10 17057 Middletown
34
7 0%
How the score is calculated

The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:

  • Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
  • Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
  • Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
  • Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set

Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.

Based on 1239 court filings across 15 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.

Distress Capital Analysis

$136,715,593 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 981 court-filed properties. Equity Division Sale filings represent the largest capital pool ($87,449,730 across 623 properties).

$137M
Total Value at Risk
981
Properties Valued
$101,500
Median Value

Capital at Risk by Filing Type

Filing Type Total Value Properties Avg Value High Equity %
Equity Division Sale
$87,449,730
623 $140,369 --
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure
$32,948,000
266 $123,865 --
Stalled Project
$5,595,100
21 $266,433 --
Partition
$2,807,551
27 $103,983 --
Pre-Foreclosure
$2,312,037
8 $289,005 75.0%
Distressed Heir
$2,185,200
3 $728,400 --
Tired Landlord
$1,311,600
19 $69,032 --
Inherited Property
$622,500
7 $88,929 --
High-Equity Distressed Properties
3 properties with 20%+ equity totaling $1,318,469 in assessed value (0.3% of all valued filings). Average property value: $439,490. These represent the highest-value investor targets — owners with real money at stake who are most likely to negotiate.

Based on 981 properties with assessor valuations (79.2% of 1239 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.

Property Type Distribution

69.4% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Residential (23.7%).

Single Family
Most common (69.4%)
941
Properties classified
3
Property categories
Property type Count Share Distribution
Single Family 653 69.4%
Residential 223 23.7%
Commercial 65 6.9%
Property type by case type
Case type Dominant property type Share Properties
Equity Division Sale Single Family 68.5% 594
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure Single Family 71.2% 264
Partition Single Family 63.6% 22
Tired Landlord Single Family 63.2% 19
Stalled Project Single Family 78.9% 19
Inherited Property Single Family 91.7% 12

Property classifications from county assessor records for 941 properties (75.9% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.

Case Aging & Stall Analysis

479 cases (38.7%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Tired Landlord cases resolve fastest (median 15 days), while Equity Division Sale cases take longest (median 281 days). 63 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.

479
Cases stalled 1yr+
38.7%
of all filings
1,239
Total tracked
Age Total Resolved Still active Resolution rate
<30 days 63 0 63 0.0%
30-90 days 135 2 133 1.5%
3-6 months 43 12 31 27.9%
6-12 months 201 61 140 30.3%
1-2 years 395 146 249 37.0%
2+ years 402 172 230 42.8%
Resolution speed by case type
Case type Total Resolved Rate Median days
Equity Division Sale 820 130 15.9% 281d
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 314 241 76.8% 55d
Stalled Project 29 3 10.3%
Partition 26 7 26.9%
Tired Landlord 22 6 27.3% 15d
Inherited Property 14 0 0.0%

Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.

Property Age & Distress Profile

960 filings (77.5% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (48%). Newer properties (2000+) average $220,500 — 2.7x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($82,352). Pre-1960 cases resolve fastest (median 15d) vs 1980–1999 (66d).

960
Properties with year built
77.5%
Coverage
Pre-1960
Most common era (48.1%)
Construction era Filings Share Avg value Median days
Pre-1960 462 48.1% $82,352 15d
1960–1979 204 21.2% $152,808
1980–1999 193 20.1% $178,979 66d
2000+ 101 10.5% $220,500

Value trend: 2000+ properties average $220,500 — 2.68x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($82,352).

Top case types by construction era
Pre-1960: Equity Division Sale (61.9%), High Urgency Pre Foreclosure (28.8%), Tired Landlord (2.6%), Partition (2.2%)
1960–1979: Equity Division Sale (69.1%), High Urgency Pre Foreclosure (25.0%), Tired Landlord (2.5%), Partition (2.0%)
1980–1999: Equity Division Sale (60.6%), High Urgency Pre Foreclosure (29.5%), Partition (3.1%), Stalled Project (2.6%)
2000+: Equity Division Sale (65.3%), High Urgency Pre Foreclosure (25.7%), Stalled Project (4.0%), Inherited Property (2.0%)

Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.

Property Value Distribution

The median property value in distressed filings is $98,200, with the largest concentration (36.5%) in the $50K–$100K range. Stalled Project filings have the highest median value ($131,350) while Tired Landlord filings are lowest ($62,900).

$98,200
Median value
$134,926
Average value
998
Properties valued
Price range Count Share Distribution
Under $50K 144 14.4%
$50K–$100K 364 36.5%
$100K–$150K 263 26.4%
$150K–$200K 81 8.1%
$200K–$300K 84 8.4%
$300K–$500K 53 5.3%
$500K+ 9 0.9%
Value by case type
Case type Median value Average value Properties
Equity Division Sale $101,900 $138,275 635
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure $95,000 $121,271 276
Partition $96,600 $95,126 23
Stalled Project $131,350 $254,345 22
Tired Landlord $62,900 $69,031 19
Inherited Property $83,450 $96,941 12

Assessed property values from county assessor records for 998 properties (80.5% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.

Ownership Duration Before Filing

The median ownership duration before a court filing is 8.2 years, with 42.3% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Stalled Project cases show the longest tenure (9.8 yr median) vs. Inherited Property (3.1 yr).

8.2 yr
Median tenure
11.4 yr
Average tenure
833
Properties tracked
Ownership period Count Share Distribution
Under 2 years 93 11.2%
2–5 years 181 21.7%
5–10 years 207 24.8%
10–20 years 192 23.0%
20+ years 160 19.2%
Tenure by case type
Case type Median tenure Average tenure Properties
Equity Division Sale 8.7 yr 11.7 yr 536
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 7.8 yr 10.9 yr 220
Stalled Project 9.8 yr 12.0 yr 20
Partition 6.4 yr 11.1 yr 20
Tired Landlord 7.6 yr 9.3 yr 17
Inherited Property 3.1 yr 12.0 yr 11

Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 833 properties (67.2% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.

Repeat litigation patterns in Dauphin County

Of 1,212 unique property owners in court filings, 24 (2.0%) appear in multiple cases, including 2 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 4 cases spanning 3 months. Tired Landlord cases have the highest repeat rate at 9.5%.

1,212
Unique owners
24
Repeat filers (2+ cases)
2.0%
Repeat rate
2
Serial filers (3+ cases)

Repeat rate by case type

Case type Repeat owners Total owners Repeat rate
Equity Division Sale 5 817 0.6%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 16 298 5.4%
Stalled Project 2 25 8.0%
Tired Landlord 2 21 9.5%

Analysis based on 1,212 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.

Serial distressed properties in Dauphin County

Of 668 unique properties in court filings, 7 (1.0%) have multiple filings (averaging 82.6 filings per property). High Urgency Pre Foreclosure properties have the highest repeat rate at 2.7%.

668
Unique properties
7
Repeat-filing properties
1.0%
Serial distress rate
0 mo
Avg time between filings

Serial distress rate by case type

Case type Serial properties Total properties Serial rate
Equity Division Sale 4 388 1.0%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 6 219 2.7%

Analysis based on 668 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.

Land vs improvement value composition

Across 961 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 19.7% (median land value $19,400, median improvement value $80,300). 12 properties (1.2%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Tired Landlord cases skew most land-heavy (median 21.1%) while Inherited Property skews most improvement-heavy (17.4%).

19.7%
Median land share
$19,400
Median land value
$80,300
Median improvement value
1.2%
Land-dominant (50%+)

Land share distribution

Land share bracket Properties % of total
Under 10% 31 3.2%
10–20% 467 48.6%
20–30% 344 35.8%
30–50% 107 11.1%
50–70% 9 0.9%
Over 70% 3 0.3%

Land share by case type

Case type Filings Median land %
Equity Division Sale 611 19.5%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 267 19.7%
Partition 22 21.0%
Stalled Project 20 18.2%
Tired Landlord 18 21.1%
Inherited Property 12 17.4%

Analysis of 961 properties (77.6% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.

Prior sale value trajectory

Across 957 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -23.4%. 593 properties (62.0%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -43.2% value change vs +3.1% for long-hold (10+ yr). Tired Landlord cases have the highest underwater rate (72.2%) while Partition has the lowest (54.5%).

-23.4%
Median value change
$130,000
Median purchase price
$98,000
Median assessed value
62.0%
Underwater properties

Value change distribution

Value change bracket Properties % of total
50%+ loss 197 20.6%
20–50% loss 320 33.4%
0–20% loss 76 7.9%
0–20% gain 60 6.3%
20–50% gain 39 4.1%
50–100% gain 19 2.0%
100%+ gain 246 25.7%

Holding period vs value change

-43.2%
Short hold (<5 yr) median change
(275 properties)
+3.1%
Long hold (10+ yr) median change
(346 properties)

Value trajectory by case type

Case type Filings Median change Underwater
Equity Division Sale 606 -22.9% 59.7%
High Urgency Pre Foreclosure 269 -28.9% 68.4%
Partition 22 -28.9% 54.5%
Stalled Project 21 -25.2% 57.1%
Tired Landlord 18 -41.4% 72.2%
Inherited Property 10 -28.7% 60.0%

Analysis of 957 properties (77.2% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.

Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites

The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Pennsylvania. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.

Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.

Methodology and data sources

Top cities for filings within Dauphin County

Where filings concentrate inside Dauphin County, by parsed property city or township.

City / Township Filings Share (of city-parsed filings)
Harrisburg56087.0%
Hummelstown446.8%
Middletown71.1%
Dauphin50.8%
Steelton50.8%

Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Dauphin County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.

Related Pennsylvania guides

Pennsylvania foreclosure process How to find leads in Pennsylvania Top foreclosure counties in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania statewide analysis

Get the underlying Dauphin County filings

Subscribe to Dauphin County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.

View Dauphin County availability

Want updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.

Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Dauphin County Pennsylvania Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-12, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/dauphin-pa-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)