Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Dauphin County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-12. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+27.6%) — last 2 complete months (125 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (98 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 16.8% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $17,916/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $106,900 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 65.9% of filings are Equity Division Sale — the dominant lead category in Dauphin County during the observed window.
About Dauphin County
Dauphin County is a county in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. As of the 2020 census, the population was 286,401. The county seat is Harrisburg, Pennsylvania's state capital and ninth-most populous city. The county was created on March 4, 1785, from part of Lancaster County and was named after Louis Joseph, Dauphin of France, the first son of King Louis XVI. Dauphin County is included in the Harrisburg–Carlisle Metropolitan Statistical Area. Located within the county is Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, site of the 1979 nuclear core meltdown. The nuclear power plant closed in 2019
Source: Wikipedia
Get Dauphin County leads delivered daily
Owner names, phone numbers, and property details — the day each case is filed. 7-day free trial.
See Dauphin County Leads →At a glance
1239 verified property-related court filings tracked across 20 months (Jan 2023 to Jul 2026).
64 typical monthly filing volume.
#10 of 18 Pennsylvania counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
2% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (19 of 1239 filings).
$106,900 median estimated property value across the 932 filings with property-enrichment data (75% coverage).
3.9% Pennsylvania unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partition | 847 | 68.4% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 314 | 25.3% | |
| Stalled Project | 29 | 2.3% | |
| Tired Landlord | 22 | 1.8% | |
| Inherited Property | 13 | 1.0% | |
| Pre-Probate | 6 | 0.5% | |
| Divorce | 3 | 0.2% | |
| Quiet Title | 3 | 0.2% | |
| Forced Liquidation | 2 | 0.2% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Dauphin County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2023 | 32 | ||
| Feb 2023 | 86 | +54 | |
| Mar 2023 | 100 | +14 | |
| Oct 2023 | 40 | -60 | |
| Nov 2023 | 81 | +41 | |
| Dec 2023 | 63 | -18 | |
| Oct 2024 | 66 | +3 | |
| Nov 2024 | 73 | +7 | |
| Dec 2024 | 75 | +2 | |
| Jan 2025 | 3 | -72 | |
| Feb 2025 | 80 | +77 | |
| Mar 2025 | 98 | +18 | |
| Jul 2025 | 32 | -66 | |
| Aug 2025 | 91 | +59 | |
| Sep 2025 | 78 | -13 | |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | -77 | |
| Apr 2026 | 97 | +96 | |
| May 2026 | 59 | -38 | |
| Jun 2026 | 66 | +7 | |
| Jul 2026 | 18 | -48 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 10 ZIPs in Dauphin County account for 49.7% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17112 | Lower Paxton Township | 134 | 10.8% | |
| 17104 | Harrisburg | 103 | 8.3% | |
| 17101 | Harrisburg | 89 | 7.2% | |
| 17111 | Harrisburg | 80 | 6.5% | |
| 17102 | Harrisburg | 65 | 5.2% | |
| 17036 | Hummelstown | 44 | 3.6% | |
| 17110 | Harrisburg | 40 | 3.2% | |
| 17109 | Lower Paxton Township | 34 | 2.7% | |
| 17103 | Harrisburg | 20 | 1.6% | |
| 17057 | Middletown | 7 | 0.6% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (52% of Dauphin County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 238 | 25.5% | |
| $75k - $150k | 459 | 49.2% | |
| $150k - $250k | 128 | 13.7% | |
| $250k - $400k | 85 | 9.1% | |
| $400k+ | 22 | 2.4% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (75% coverage on Dauphin County filings). Median $106,900; mean $145,684.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 2 | 0.2% | |
| Mon | 217 | 17.5% | |
| Tue | 275 | 22.2% | |
| Wed | 226 | 18.2% | |
| Thu | 225 | 18.2% | |
| Fri | 292 | 23.6% | |
| Sat | 2 | 0.2% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 1239 filings with a parseable date.
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 127259 Dauphin County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Dauphin County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 5.9% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 62.1% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 19.6% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 49.7% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 17.7% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Dauphin County sits within the Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $1,058 |
| 1-bedroom | $1,212 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,493 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,920 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,977 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Dauphin County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 329 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -34.1% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 54.7% |
| Single-family units permitted | 180 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 149 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Dauphin County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Pennsylvania state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania home price index (year-over-year) | +5.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Pennsylvania home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +59.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series PASTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Local-market benchmark
Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:
| Indicator | Filing-weighted average |
|---|---|
| Median household income (where filings cluster) | $79,267 |
| Median home value | $232,321 |
| Owner-occupancy rate | 51.3% |
| Renter share of households | 48.7% |
| Median gross rent | $1,207/mo |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 6 top ZIPs.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Dauphin County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 27 |
| U.S. BANK TRUST N.A | 20 |
| NEWREZ | 15 |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 15 |
| U.S. BANK N.A | 13 |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES | 13 |
| WELLS FARGO BANK | 12 |
| MEMBERS 1ST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION | 11 |
| PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY | 10 |
| LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING | 9 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Dauphin County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 600 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 551 | 91.8% |
| AE | 35 | 5.8% |
| X-500yr | 13 | 2.2% |
| A | 1 | 0.2% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 600 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 817 | 65.9% | +2.9% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 306 | 24.7% | -55.6% |
| Partition | 30 | 2.4% | +42.9% |
| Stalled Project | 29 | 2.3% | -50.0% |
| Tired Landlord | 22 | 1.8% | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 8 | 0.6% | -- |
| Inherited Property | 8 | 0.6% | -- |
| Pre-Probate | 6 | 0.5% | -- |
| Distressed Heir | 5 | 0.4% | -- |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 27 | 10.1% |
| US BANK TRUST NA | 20 | 7.5% |
| NEWREZ | 15 | 5.6% |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 15 | 5.6% |
| US BANK NA | 13 | 4.9% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 267 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Apr and are lowest in Jan. The 5.5x peak-to-trough ratio suggests strong seasonal patterns — investors who time their outreach around Apr can reach more distressed homeowners.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 17.5 | 18% |
| Feb | 83 | 86% |
| Mar | 66.3 | 68% |
| Apr | 97 | 100% |
| May | 59 | 61% |
| Jun | 66 | 68% |
| Jul | 32 | 33% |
| Aug | 91 | 94% |
| Sep | 78 | 80% |
| Oct | 53 | 55% |
| Nov | 77 | 79% |
| Dec | 69 | 71% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Apr), with a 5.5x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 22 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17112 | Lower Paxton Township | 134 | 10.8% | $124,200 |
| 17104 | Harrisburg | 103 | 8.3% | $91,150 |
| 17101 | Harrisburg | 89 | 7.2% | $93,900 |
| 17111 | Harrisburg | 80 | 6.5% | $135,200 |
| 17102 | Harrisburg | 65 | 5.2% | $82,100 |
| 17036 | Hummelstown | 44 | 3.6% | $125,100 |
| 17110 | Harrisburg | 40 | 3.2% | $105,900 |
| 17109 | Lower Paxton Township | 34 | 2.7% | $100,450 |
| 17103 | Harrisburg | 20 | 1.6% | $117,826 |
| 17057 | Middletown | 7 | 0.6% | $170,250 |
Top 10 of 22 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (98%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 817 | 0.0% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 306 | 0.0% |
| Partition | 30 | 13.3% |
| Stalled Project | 29 | 0.0% |
| Tired Landlord | 22 | 0.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 8 | 100.0% |
| Inherited Property | 8 | 0.0% |
| Pre-Probate | 6 | 100.0% |
| Distressed Heir | 5 | 0.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Distress composition and shifts
Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. High Urgency Pre Foreclosure share is declining.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 68.8% | 65.1% | +3.7pp |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 12.0% | 26.5% | -14.5pp (falling) |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 5.6% | 0.1% | +5.5pp (rising) |
| Tired Landlord | 4.0% | 1.6% | +2.4pp |
| Pre-Probate | 3.2% | 0.2% | +3.0pp |
| Inherited Property | 3.2% | 0.4% | +2.8pp |
| Divorce | 1.6% | 0.1% | +1.5pp |
| Forced Liquidation | 0.8% | 0.1% | +0.7pp |
| Stalled Project | 0.8% | 2.6% | -1.8pp |
| Partition | 0.0% | 2.7% | -2.7pp |
| Distressed Heir | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5pp |
| Title Clearance Play | 0.0% | 0.3% | -0.3pp |
Distress diversity score: 1.68 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline
32.0% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 44 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is settled / agreed resolution (177 cases, 45% of resolved).
| Resolution Type | Median Days | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Judgment | 15 | 15 |
Detailed disposition breakdown
| Disposition | Count | % of Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| Settlement | 177 | 45.0% |
| Final Judgment | 152 | 38.7% |
| Sheriff Sale | 63 | 16.0% |
| Default Judgment | 1 | 0.3% |
Outcomes by Case Type
| Case Type | Cases | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Median Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 820 | 130 | 15.9% | 68 |
| High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure | 311 | 241 | 77.5% | 55 |
| Stalled Project | 29 | 3 | 10.3% | — |
| Partition | 26 | 7 | 26.9% | — |
| Tired Landlord | 22 | 6 | 27.3% | 15 |
| Inherited Property | 8 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Distressed Heir | 5 | 4 | 80.0% | — |
Based on 1228 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 835 cases are still active or pending resolution.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $101,500. Pre-Foreclosure filings involve the highest-value properties (median $213,455), while Tired Landlord filings trend lower (median $62,900). The largest segment (49.4%) falls in the Under $100K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 485 | 49.4% |
| $100K - $250K | 389 | 39.7% |
| $250K - $500K | 97 | 9.9% |
| $500K - $1M | 4 | 0.4% |
| Over $1M | 6 | 0.6% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | $103,100 | $140,369 | 623 |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | $97,600 | $123,865 | 266 |
| Partition | $98,000 | $103,983 | 27 |
| Stalled Project | $150,000 | $266,433 | 21 |
| Tired Landlord | $62,900 | $69,032 | 19 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $213,455 | $289,005 | 8 |
| Inherited Property | $67,300 | $88,929 | 7 |
Based on county assessor records for 981 properties with court filings (79.2% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 15 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 17112 (Harrisburg) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (134 cases). 6 of 15 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 45.
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 17112 | Harrisburg |
75
|
134 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 17104 | Harrisburg |
67
|
103 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 17111 | Harrisburg |
61
|
80 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 17101 | Harrisburg |
60
|
89 | — | 0% |
| #5 | 17102 | Harrisburg |
57
|
65 | — | 0% |
| #6 | 17110 | Harrisburg |
47
|
40 | — | 0% |
| #7 | 17036 | Hummelstown |
43
|
44 | — | 0% |
| #8 | 17109 | Harrisburg |
41
|
34 | — | 0% |
| #9 | 17103 | Harrisburg |
40
|
20 | — | 0% |
| #10 | 17057 | Middletown |
34
|
7 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 1239 court filings across 15 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$136,715,593 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 981 court-filed properties. Equity Division Sale filings represent the largest capital pool ($87,449,730 across 623 properties).
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | $87,449,730 | 623 | $140,369 | -- |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | $32,948,000 | 266 | $123,865 | -- |
| Stalled Project | $5,595,100 | 21 | $266,433 | -- |
| Partition | $2,807,551 | 27 | $103,983 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $2,312,037 | 8 | $289,005 | 75.0% |
| Distressed Heir | $2,185,200 | 3 | $728,400 | -- |
| Tired Landlord | $1,311,600 | 19 | $69,032 | -- |
| Inherited Property | $622,500 | 7 | $88,929 | -- |
Based on 981 properties with assessor valuations (79.2% of 1239 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Property Type Distribution
69.4% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Residential (23.7%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 653 | 69.4% | |
| Residential | 223 | 23.7% | |
| Commercial | 65 | 6.9% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | Single Family | 68.5% | 594 |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | Single Family | 71.2% | 264 |
| Partition | Single Family | 63.6% | 22 |
| Tired Landlord | Single Family | 63.2% | 19 |
| Stalled Project | Single Family | 78.9% | 19 |
| Inherited Property | Single Family | 91.7% | 12 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 941 properties (75.9% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
479 cases (38.7%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Tired Landlord cases resolve fastest (median 15 days), while Equity Division Sale cases take longest (median 281 days). 63 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 135 | 2 | 133 | 1.5% |
| 3-6 months | 43 | 12 | 31 | 27.9% |
| 6-12 months | 201 | 61 | 140 | 30.3% |
| 1-2 years | 395 | 146 | 249 | 37.0% |
| 2+ years | 402 | 172 | 230 | 42.8% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 820 | 130 | 15.9% | 281d |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 314 | 241 | 76.8% | 55d |
| Stalled Project | 29 | 3 | 10.3% | — |
| Partition | 26 | 7 | 26.9% | — |
| Tired Landlord | 22 | 6 | 27.3% | 15d |
| Inherited Property | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
960 filings (77.5% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (48%). Newer properties (2000+) average $220,500 — 2.7x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($82,352). Pre-1960 cases resolve fastest (median 15d) vs 1980–1999 (66d).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 462 | 48.1% | $82,352 | 15d |
| 1960–1979 | 204 | 21.2% | $152,808 | — |
| 1980–1999 | 193 | 20.1% | $178,979 | 66d |
| 2000+ | 101 | 10.5% | $220,500 | — |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $220,500 — 2.68x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($82,352).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 6 comparable quarters show 1,220 tracked filings in Dauphin County. High Urgency Pre Foreclosure shows the largest composition shift, declining share from 28.9% to 22.4%.
| Quarter | Total | Equity Division Sale | High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | Stalled Project | Partition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q1 | 218 | 142 (65.1%) | 65 (29.8%) | 7 (3.2%) | 3 (1.4%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 184 | 123 (66.8%) | 53 (28.8%) | 5 (2.7%) | 3 (1.6%) |
| 2024 Q4 | 214 | 139 (65.0%) | 60 (28.0%) | 8 (3.7%) | 7 (3.3%) |
| 2025 Q1 | 181 | 120 (66.3%) | 49 (27.1%) | 5 (2.8%) | 5 (2.8%) |
| 2025 Q3 | 201 | 136 (67.7%) | 54 (26.9%) | 2 (1.0%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 222 | 143 (64.4%) | 32 (14.4%) | 2 (0.9%) | — |
Composition shift: High Urgency Pre Foreclosure filings are declining share, moving from 28.9% to 22.4% of total filings (-6.5 percentage points).
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $98,200, with the largest concentration (36.5%) in the $50K–$100K range. Stalled Project filings have the highest median value ($131,350) while Tired Landlord filings are lowest ($62,900).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 144 | 14.4% | |
| $50K–$100K | 364 | 36.5% | |
| $100K–$150K | 263 | 26.4% | |
| $150K–$200K | 81 | 8.1% | |
| $200K–$300K | 84 | 8.4% | |
| $300K–$500K | 53 | 5.3% | |
| $500K+ | 9 | 0.9% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | $101,900 | $138,275 | 635 |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | $95,000 | $121,271 | 276 |
| Partition | $96,600 | $95,126 | 23 |
| Stalled Project | $131,350 | $254,345 | 22 |
| Tired Landlord | $62,900 | $69,031 | 19 |
| Inherited Property | $83,450 | $96,941 | 12 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 998 properties (80.5% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 8.2 years, with 42.3% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Stalled Project cases show the longest tenure (9.8 yr median) vs. Inherited Property (3.1 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 93 | 11.2% | |
| 2–5 years | 181 | 21.7% | |
| 5–10 years | 207 | 24.8% | |
| 10–20 years | 192 | 23.0% | |
| 20+ years | 160 | 19.2% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 8.7 yr | 11.7 yr | 536 |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 7.8 yr | 10.9 yr | 220 |
| Stalled Project | 9.8 yr | 12.0 yr | 20 |
| Partition | 6.4 yr | 11.1 yr | 20 |
| Tired Landlord | 7.6 yr | 9.3 yr | 17 |
| Inherited Property | 3.1 yr | 12.0 yr | 11 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 833 properties (67.2% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Dauphin County
Of 1,212 unique property owners in court filings, 24 (2.0%) appear in multiple cases, including 2 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 4 cases spanning 3 months. Tired Landlord cases have the highest repeat rate at 9.5%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 5 | 817 | 0.6% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 16 | 298 | 5.4% |
| Stalled Project | 2 | 25 | 8.0% |
| Tired Landlord | 2 | 21 | 9.5% |
Analysis based on 1,212 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Serial distressed properties in Dauphin County
Of 668 unique properties in court filings, 7 (1.0%) have multiple filings (averaging 82.6 filings per property). High Urgency Pre Foreclosure properties have the highest repeat rate at 2.7%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 4 | 388 | 1.0% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 6 | 219 | 2.7% |
Analysis based on 668 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 961 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 19.7% (median land value $19,400, median improvement value $80,300). 12 properties (1.2%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Tired Landlord cases skew most land-heavy (median 21.1%) while Inherited Property skews most improvement-heavy (17.4%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 31 | 3.2% |
| 10–20% | 467 | 48.6% |
| 20–30% | 344 | 35.8% |
| 30–50% | 107 | 11.1% |
| 50–70% | 9 | 0.9% |
| Over 70% | 3 | 0.3% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 611 | 19.5% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 267 | 19.7% |
| Partition | 22 | 21.0% |
| Stalled Project | 20 | 18.2% |
| Tired Landlord | 18 | 21.1% |
| Inherited Property | 12 | 17.4% |
Analysis of 961 properties (77.6% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Prior sale value trajectory
Across 957 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -23.4%. 593 properties (62.0%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -43.2% value change vs +3.1% for long-hold (10+ yr). Tired Landlord cases have the highest underwater rate (72.2%) while Partition has the lowest (54.5%).
Value change distribution
| Value change bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 50%+ loss | 197 | 20.6% |
| 20–50% loss | 320 | 33.4% |
| 0–20% loss | 76 | 7.9% |
| 0–20% gain | 60 | 6.3% |
| 20–50% gain | 39 | 4.1% |
| 50–100% gain | 19 | 2.0% |
| 100%+ gain | 246 | 25.7% |
Holding period vs value change
(275 properties)
(346 properties)
Value trajectory by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median change | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 606 | -22.9% | 59.7% |
| High Urgency Pre Foreclosure | 269 | -28.9% | 68.4% |
| Partition | 22 | -28.9% | 54.5% |
| Stalled Project | 21 | -25.2% | 57.1% |
| Tired Landlord | 18 | -41.4% | 72.2% |
| Inherited Property | 10 | -28.7% | 60.0% |
Analysis of 957 properties (77.2% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Pennsylvania. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Dauphin County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (75% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-12 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Dauphin County
Where filings concentrate inside Dauphin County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Harrisburg | 560 | 87.0% |
| Hummelstown | 44 | 6.8% |
| Middletown | 7 | 1.1% |
| Dauphin | 5 | 0.8% |
| Steelton | 5 | 0.8% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Dauphin County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Pennsylvania guides
Get the underlying Dauphin County filings
Subscribe to Dauphin County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Dauphin County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Dauphin County Pennsylvania Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-12, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/dauphin-pa-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)