Hamilton County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Hamilton County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-16. See methodology.
- Max gross cap rate 4.2% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $17,676/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $417,630 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 36.0% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Hamilton County during the observed window.
About Hamilton County
Hamilton County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. The 2020 United States census recorded a population of 347,467. The county seat is Noblesville.
Source: Wikipedia
Get Hamilton County leads delivered daily
Owner names, phone numbers, and property details — the day each case is filed. 7-day free trial.
See Hamilton County Leads →At a glance
14427 verified property-related court filings tracked across 55 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
264 typical monthly filing volume.
#10 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
0% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (55 of 14427 filings).
$417,630 median estimated property value across the 82 filings with property-enrichment data (1% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5191 | 36.0% | |
| Partition | 5096 | 35.3% | |
| Probate | 2419 | 16.8% | |
| Guardianship | 1072 | 7.4% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 649 | 4.5% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Hamilton County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 296 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 319 | +23 | |
| Mar 2020 | 339 | +20 | |
| Apr 2020 | 205 | -134 | |
| May 2020 | 279 | +74 | |
| Jun 2020 | 286 | +7 | |
| Jul 2020 | 219 | -67 | |
| Aug 2020 | 291 | +72 | |
| Sep 2020 | 278 | -13 | |
| Oct 2020 | 253 | -25 | |
| Nov 2020 | 264 | +11 | |
| Dec 2020 | 252 | -12 | |
| Jan 2021 | 219 | -33 | |
| Feb 2021 | 239 | +20 | |
| Mar 2021 | 275 | +36 | |
| Apr 2021 | 240 | -35 | |
| May 2021 | 192 | -48 | |
| Jun 2021 | 262 | +70 | |
| Jul 2021 | 224 | -38 | |
| Aug 2021 | 245 | +21 | |
| Sep 2021 | 237 | -8 | |
| Oct 2021 | 259 | +22 | |
| Nov 2021 | 247 | -12 | |
| Dec 2021 | 220 | -27 | |
| Jan 2022 | 257 | +37 | |
| Feb 2022 | 227 | -30 | |
| Mar 2022 | 299 | +72 | |
| Apr 2022 | 300 | +1 | |
| May 2022 | 289 | -11 | |
| Jun 2022 | 323 | +34 | |
| Jul 2022 | 315 | -8 | |
| Aug 2022 | 311 | -4 | |
| Sep 2022 | 314 | +3 | |
| Oct 2022 | 309 | -5 | |
| Nov 2022 | 262 | -47 | |
| Dec 2022 | 259 | -3 | |
| Jan 2023 | 313 | +54 | |
| Feb 2023 | 402 | +89 | |
| Mar 2023 | 364 | -38 | |
| Apr 2023 | 330 | -34 | |
| May 2023 | 321 | -9 | |
| Jun 2023 | 390 | +69 | |
| Jul 2023 | 344 | -46 | |
| Aug 2023 | 454 | +110 | |
| Sep 2023 | 341 | -113 | |
| Oct 2023 | 342 | +1 | |
| Nov 2023 | 344 | +2 | |
| Dec 2023 | 338 | -6 | |
| Jan 2024 | 1 | -337 | |
| Feb 2024 | 1 | 0 | |
| May 2024 | 1 | 0 | |
| Sep 2025 | 1 | 0 | |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 0 | |
| Jun 2026 | 347 | +346 | |
| Jul 2026 | 187 | -160 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 9 ZIPs in Hamilton County account for 0.2% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46062 | Noblesville | 7 | 0.0% | |
| 46074 | Westfield | 5 | 0.0% | |
| 46060 | Noblesville | 4 | 0.0% | |
| 46032 | Carmel | 3 | 0.0% | |
| 46040 | Fishers | 2 | 0.0% | |
| 46033 | Carmel | 2 | 0.0% | |
| 46031 | Atlanta | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 46034 | Cicero | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 46069 | Sheridan | 1 | 0.0% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (0% of Hamilton County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 6 | 7.3% | |
| $75k - $150k | 6 | 7.3% | |
| $150k - $250k | 3 | 3.7% | |
| $250k - $400k | 23 | 28.0% | |
| $400k+ | 44 | 53.7% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (1% coverage on Hamilton County filings). Median $417,630; mean $564,251.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Hamilton County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 54 | 0.4% | |
| Mon | 2579 | 17.9% | |
| Tue | 2864 | 19.9% | |
| Wed | 2843 | 19.7% | |
| Thu | 2672 | 18.5% | |
| Fri | 3341 | 23.2% | |
| Sat | 74 | 0.5% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 14427 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 89 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 2003 |
| Median living area | 3,214 sqft |
| Median lot size | 0.77 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 140389 Hamilton County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Hamilton County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 5.1% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 73.5% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 3.3% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 75.2% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 13.4% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Hamilton County sits within the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $1,118 |
| 1-bedroom | $1,267 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,473 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,907 |
| 4-bedroom | $2,338 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Hamilton County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 4,146 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -9.1% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 70.8% |
| Single-family units permitted | 2,934 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 1,212 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Hamilton County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Hamilton County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| FIRST BANK D/B/A FIRST BANK MORTGAGE | 1 |
| DATA MORTGAGE INC | 1 |
| CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, LLC | 1 |
| PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC | 1 |
| NEW AMERICAN FUNDING LLC F/K/A BROKER SOLUTIONS, INC. D/B/A NEW AMERICAN FUNDING | 1 |
| HORIZON BANK | 1 |
| LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC | 1 |
| U.S. BANK N.A. | 1 |
| ARVEST BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY MERGER TO ARVEST CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY | 1 |
| UNION HOME MORTGAGE CORP. | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Hamilton County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Hamilton County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 84 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 81 | 96.4% |
| AE | 2 | 2.4% |
| A | 1 | 1.2% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 84 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5191 | 36.0% | -41.7% |
| Partition | 5096 | 35.3% | -10.2% |
| Probate | 2419 | 16.8% | -13.7% |
| Guardianship | 1072 | 7.4% | -8.3% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 649 | 4.5% | +24.0% |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| FIRST BANK | 1 | 6.7% |
| DATA MORTGAGE INC | 1 | 6.7% |
| CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE LLC | 1 | 6.7% |
| PLANET HOME LENDING LLC | 1 | 6.7% |
| NEW AMERICAN FUNDING LLC | 1 | 6.7% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 15 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Aug and are lowest in Jan. The 1.8x peak-to-trough ratio suggests strong seasonal patterns — investors who time their outreach around Aug can reach more distressed homeowners.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 181.2 | 56% |
| Feb | 237.6 | 73% |
| Mar | 319.2 | 98% |
| Apr | 268.8 | 83% |
| May | 216.4 | 67% |
| Jun | 321.6 | 99% |
| Jul | 275.5 | 85% |
| Aug | 325.2 | 100% |
| Sep | 234.2 | 72% |
| Oct | 290.8 | 89% |
| Nov | 279.2 | 86% |
| Dec | 267.2 | 82% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Aug), with a 1.8x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 9 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating. 2 of the top hotspots have high-equity properties (>40% equity), signaling potential value-add or wholesale opportunities.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | High equity | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46062 | Noblesville | 7 | 0.0% | 43% | $420,462 |
| 46074 | Westfield | 5 | 0.0% | 120% | $674,023 |
| 46060 | Noblesville | 4 | 0.0% | 0% | $262,600 |
| 46032 | Carmel | 3 | 0.0% | 0% | $1,097,038 |
| 46040 | Fishers | 2 | 0.0% | 0% | $522,586 |
| 46033 | Carmel | 2 | 0.0% | 0% | $906,700 |
| 46031 | Atlanta | 1 | 0.0% | 0% | $269,000 |
| 46034 | Cicero | 1 | 0.0% | 0% | -- |
| 46069 | Sheridan | 1 | 0.0% | 0% | $254,200 |
Top 9 of 9 ZIP codes with filings. High equity = properties with estimated equity above 40% (from third-party enrichment).
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (100%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5191 | 0.7% |
| Partition | 5096 | 0.0% |
| Probate | 2419 | 0.4% |
| Guardianship | 1072 | 0.7% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 649 | 0.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Partition share is rising. Divorce, Probate share is declining.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partition | 47.4% | 35.0% | +12.4pp (rising) |
| Divorce | 29.0% | 36.2% | -7.2pp (falling) |
| Probate | 10.9% | 16.9% | -6.0pp (falling) |
| Guardianship | 7.2% | 7.5% | -0.3pp |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 5.5% | 4.4% | +1.1pp |
Distress diversity score: 1.88 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $401,600. Probate filings involve the highest-value properties (median $485,900), while Divorce filings trend lower (median $370,900). The largest segment (42.4%) falls in the $250K - $500K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 13 | 15.3% |
| $100K - $250K | 5 | 5.9% |
| $250K - $500K | 36 | 42.4% |
| $500K - $1M | 21 | 24.7% |
| Over $1M | 10 | 11.8% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $370,900 | $447,746 | 50 |
| Probate | $485,900 | $840,171 | 14 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $470,025 | $563,107 | 12 |
| Guardianship | $442,800 | $602,011 | 9 |
Based on county assessor records for 85 properties with court filings (0.6% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 4 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46062 (Westfield) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (7 cases).
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 46062 | Westfield |
75
|
7 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 46074 | Carmel |
42
|
5 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 46060 | Noblesville |
34
|
4 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 46032 | Carmel |
25
|
3 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 14427 court filings across 4 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$46,325,085 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 85 court-filed properties. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($22,387,297 across 50 properties). 5 high-equity distressed properties ($2,564,517 total) represent the highest-value investor targets.
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $22,387,297 | 50 | $447,746 | 100.0% |
| Probate | $11,762,400 | 14 | $840,171 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $6,757,288 | 12 | $563,107 | 33.3% |
| Guardianship | $5,418,100 | 9 | $602,011 | -- |
Based on 85 properties with assessor valuations (0.6% of 14427 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
184 court filings tracked with 0 resolved (0.0% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 184 active cases.
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | 95 | 0 | +95 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2026 | 89 | 0 | +89 | 0.0% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 103 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Probate | 42 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Guardianship | 20 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 0 resolved cases out of 184 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
57.9% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (21.1%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 44 | 57.9% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 16 | 21.1% | |
| Agricultural | 11 | 14.5% | |
| Residential | 5 | 6.6% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 56.2% | 48 |
| Probate | Single Family | 50.0% | 12 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 88.9% | 9 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 42.9% | 7 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 76 properties (41.3% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
0 cases (0.0%) have been active for over a year without resolution. 165 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 165 | 0 | 165 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 103 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Probate | 42 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Guardianship | 20 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
70 filings (38.0% of scope) have year-built data. 2000+ properties are most common (57%). Newer properties (2000+) average $590,538 — 2.0x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($300,882).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 11 | 15.7% | $300,882 | — |
| 1960–1979 | 8 | 11.4% | $352,600 | — |
| 1980–1999 | 11 | 15.7% | $566,255 | — |
| 2000+ | 40 | 57.1% | $590,538 | — |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $590,538 — 1.96x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($300,882).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $372,400, with the largest concentration (34.1%) in the $500K+ range. Probate filings have the highest median value ($443,700) while Divorce filings are lowest ($351,800).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 10 | 11.4% | |
| $50K–$100K | 6 | 6.8% | |
| $100K–$150K | 3 | 3.4% | |
| $150K–$200K | 3 | 3.4% | |
| $200K–$300K | 13 | 14.8% | |
| $300K–$500K | 23 | 26.1% | |
| $500K+ | 30 | 34.1% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $351,800 | $428,226 | 53 |
| Probate | $443,700 | $840,171 | 14 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $353,200 | $475,536 | 11 |
| Guardianship | $408,350 | $541,900 | 10 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 88 properties (47.8% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 5.4 years (25.9% held 10+ years). Divorce cases show the longest tenure (5.8 yr median) vs. Probate (4.3 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 23 | 27.1% | |
| 2–5 years | 17 | 20.0% | |
| 5–10 years | 23 | 27.1% | |
| 10–20 years | 20 | 23.5% | |
| 20+ years | 2 | 2.4% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5.8 yr | 6.9 yr | 51 |
| Probate | 4.3 yr | 5.8 yr | 14 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 4.9 yr | 6.6 yr | 11 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 85 properties (46.2% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Serial distressed properties in Hamilton County
Of 86 unique properties in court filings, 9 (10.5%) have multiple filings. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 36.4%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8 | 52 | 15.4% |
| Guardianship | 4 | 11 | 36.4% |
Analysis based on 86 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 73 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 23.1% (median land value $103,900, median improvement value $316,300). 5 properties (6.8%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Probate cases skew most land-heavy (median 25.8%) while Divorce skews most improvement-heavy (22.6%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 10–20% | 23 | 31.5% |
| 20–30% | 35 | 47.9% |
| 30–50% | 10 | 13.7% |
| 50–70% | 4 | 5.5% |
| Over 70% | 1 | 1.4% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 43 | 22.6% |
| Probate | 13 | 25.8% |
Analysis of 73 properties (39.7% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Hamilton County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (1% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-16 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Hamilton County
Where filings concentrate inside Hamilton County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Noblesville | 10 | 38.5% |
| Carmel | 6 | 23.1% |
| Westfield | 5 | 19.2% |
| Fortville | 1 | 3.8% |
| Atlanta | 1 | 3.8% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Hamilton County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Hamilton County filings
Subscribe to Hamilton County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Hamilton County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Hamilton County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-16, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/hamilton-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)