Warrick County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Warrick County court dockets. Updated 2026-09-28. See methodology.
- Filing volume holding steady (+4.3%) — last 2 complete months (122 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (117 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 6.6% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $13,356/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $203,700 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 39.7% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Warrick County during the observed window.
About Warrick County
Warrick County is a county located in the U.S. state of Indiana. As of 2020, the population was 63,898. The county seat is Boonville. It was organized in 1813 and was named for Captain Jacob Warrick, an Indiana militia company commander killed in the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811. It is one of the ten fastest-growing counties in Indiana.
Source: Wikipedia
Get Warrick County leads delivered daily
Owner names and property details the day each case is filed, with owner phone lookups where offered. 7-day free trial.
See Warrick County Leads →At a glance
4381 property-related court filings tracked across 81 months (Jan 2020 to Sep 2026).
55 typical monthly filing volume.
#15 of 25 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
14% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (617 of 4381 filings).
$203,700 median estimated property value across the 2614 filings with property-enrichment data (60% coverage).
3.6% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-07). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1739 | 39.7% | |
| Probate | 1268 | 28.9% | |
| Guardianship | 524 | 12.0% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 483 | 11.0% | |
| Partition | 367 | 8.4% |
Each row is a distinct case as recorded on the county docket.
Get the full Warrick County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names and property details, plus owner phone lookups where offered. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 60 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 74 | +14 | |
| Mar 2020 | 52 | -22 | |
| Apr 2020 | 33 | -19 | |
| May 2020 | 49 | +16 | |
| Jun 2020 | 41 | -8 | |
| Jul 2020 | 63 | +22 | |
| Aug 2020 | 47 | -16 | |
| Sep 2020 | 59 | +12 | |
| Oct 2020 | 66 | +7 | |
| Nov 2020 | 40 | -26 | |
| Dec 2020 | 53 | +13 | |
| Jan 2021 | 54 | +1 | |
| Feb 2021 | 50 | -4 | |
| Mar 2021 | 61 | +11 | |
| Apr 2021 | 57 | -4 | |
| May 2021 | 59 | +2 | |
| Jun 2021 | 47 | -12 | |
| Jul 2021 | 57 | +10 | |
| Aug 2021 | 52 | -5 | |
| Sep 2021 | 48 | -4 | |
| Oct 2021 | 67 | +19 | |
| Nov 2021 | 52 | -15 | |
| Dec 2021 | 42 | -10 | |
| Jan 2022 | 42 | 0 | |
| Feb 2022 | 41 | -1 | |
| Mar 2022 | 81 | +40 | |
| Apr 2022 | 61 | -20 | |
| May 2022 | 48 | -13 | |
| Jun 2022 | 69 | +21 | |
| Jul 2022 | 53 | -16 | |
| Aug 2022 | 62 | +9 | |
| Sep 2022 | 65 | +3 | |
| Oct 2022 | 54 | -11 | |
| Nov 2022 | 53 | -1 | |
| Dec 2022 | 37 | -16 | |
| Jan 2023 | 59 | +22 | |
| Feb 2023 | 46 | -13 | |
| Mar 2023 | 55 | +9 | |
| Apr 2023 | 50 | -5 | |
| May 2023 | 55 | +5 | |
| Jun 2023 | 64 | +9 | |
| Jul 2023 | 57 | -7 | |
| Aug 2023 | 70 | +13 | |
| Sep 2023 | 52 | -18 | |
| Oct 2023 | 62 | +10 | |
| Nov 2023 | 38 | -24 | |
| Dec 2023 | 41 | +3 | |
| Jan 2024 | 55 | +14 | |
| Feb 2024 | 67 | +12 | |
| Mar 2024 | 55 | -12 | |
| Apr 2024 | 64 | +9 | |
| May 2024 | 62 | -2 | |
| Jun 2024 | 48 | -14 | |
| Jul 2024 | 61 | +13 | |
| Aug 2024 | 59 | -2 | |
| Sep 2024 | 43 | -16 | |
| Oct 2024 | 64 | +21 | |
| Nov 2024 | 45 | -19 | |
| Dec 2024 | 42 | -3 | |
| Jan 2025 | 50 | +8 | |
| Feb 2025 | 49 | -1 | |
| Mar 2025 | 61 | +12 | |
| Apr 2025 | 59 | -2 | |
| May 2025 | 57 | -2 | |
| Jun 2025 | 48 | -9 | |
| Jul 2025 | 50 | +2 | |
| Aug 2025 | 41 | -9 | |
| Sep 2025 | 63 | +22 | |
| Oct 2025 | 54 | -9 | |
| Nov 2025 | 45 | -9 | |
| Dec 2025 | 58 | +13 | |
| Jan 2026 | 55 | -3 | |
| Feb 2026 | 51 | -4 | |
| Mar 2026 | 70 | +19 | |
| Apr 2026 | 59 | -11 | |
| May 2026 | 56 | -3 | |
| Jun 2026 | 61 | +5 | |
| Jul 2026 | 53 | -8 | |
| Aug 2026 | 69 | +16 | |
| Sep 2026 | 9 | -60 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 8 ZIPs in Warrick County account for 47.7% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47630 | Newburgh | 1134 | 25.9% | |
| 47601 | Boonville | 560 | 12.8% | |
| 47610 | Chandler | 185 | 4.2% | |
| 47613 | ELBERFELD | 72 | 1.6% | |
| 47637 | Tennyson | 57 | 1.3% | |
| 47619 | LYNNVILLE | 53 | 1.2% | |
| 47523 | DALE | 19 | 0.4% | |
| 47537 | GENTRYVILLE | 8 | 0.2% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (48% of Warrick County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings the same day they hit the court docket, with owner phone lookups where offered.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 141 | 5.4% | |
| $75k - $150k | 620 | 23.7% | |
| $150k - $250k | 1016 | 38.9% | |
| $250k - $400k | 556 | 21.3% | |
| $400k+ | 281 | 10.7% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (60% coverage on Warrick County filings). Median $203,700; mean $236,319.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names and property details (owner phone lookups where offered) for every new filing in Warrick County.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 16 | 0.4% | |
| Mon | 863 | 19.7% | |
| Tue | 902 | 20.6% | |
| Wed | 890 | 20.3% | |
| Thu | 812 | 18.5% | |
| Fri | 883 | 20.2% | |
| Sat | 15 | 0.3% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 4381 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 2842 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 1994 |
| Median living area | 933 sqft |
| Median lot size | 0.33 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 26567 Warrick County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Warrick County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 7.0% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 64.4% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 9.2% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 82.4% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 18.5% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Warrick County sits within the Evansville, IN. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $853 |
| 1-bedroom | $860 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,113 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,370 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,539 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Warrick County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 343 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | +36.7% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 55.4% |
| Single-family units permitted | 190 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 153 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Warrick County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.6% | 2026-04-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +67.6% | 2026-04-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.86% | 2026-04-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Local-market benchmark
Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:
| Indicator | Filing-weighted average |
|---|---|
| Median household income (where filings cluster) | $90,567 |
| Median home value | $220,440 |
| Owner-occupancy rate | 82.3% |
| Renter share of households | 17.7% |
| Median gross rent | $990/mo |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 8 top ZIPs.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Warrick County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 2 |
| CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC | 1 |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 1 |
| CITIZENS BANK NA F/K/A RBS CITIZENS NA | 1 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING THROUGH THE RURAL HOUSING SERVICE OR SUCCESSOR | 1 |
| ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC | 1 |
| SELENE FINANCE, LP | 1 |
| NEW AMERICAN FUNDING, LLC | 1 |
| PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Warrick County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Warrick County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 2851 filings (65.1% of all 4381 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Filings | Confirmed sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Foreclosure | 483 | 169 | 35.0% |
| Probate | 1268 | 285 | 22.5% |
| Divorce | 1739 | 378 | 21.7% |
| Partition | 367 | 42 | 11.4% |
| Guardianship | 524 | 37 | 7.1% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 76.8% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sold within 2 years of filing | Sold within 2 years of the filing — inside the window where the case is a plausible cause | 500 | 54.9% |
| Sold during the case | Sold while the case was still open — the strongest link between the filing and the sale | 199 | 21.9% |
| Sold later (not attributable) | Sold more than 2 years after filing — recorded, but too late to attribute to the case | 174 | 19.1% |
| Confirmed did not sell | Confirmed it did NOT sell — the ownership record covers the whole period and shows no transfer | 33 | 3.6% |
| Undetermined | No sale has been recorded yet — this is an open question, not a finding of 'did not sell' | 4 | 0.4% |
Who bought the property
Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.
| Buyer | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupant | 587 | 83.7% |
| Investor | 62 | 8.8% |
| Bank / auction | 33 | 4.7% |
| Government agency | 18 | 2.6% |
| Family / non-arm's-length | 1 | 0.1% |
Based on 701 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 2851 of 4381 filings (65.1% parcel coverage). Prices based on 356 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Warrick County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 41 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 38 | 92.7% |
| A | 2 | 4.9% |
| AE | 1 | 2.4% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 41 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1739 | 39.7% | +21.7% |
| Probate | 1268 | 28.9% | -7.3% |
| Guardianship | 524 | 12.0% | +18.2% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 483 | 11.0% | -33.3% |
| Partition | 367 | 8.4% | -26.7% |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 2 | 18.2% |
| ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC | 2 | 18.2% |
| CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC | 1 | 9.1% |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 1 | 9.1% |
| CITIZENS BANK NA | 1 | 9.1% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 11 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Nov. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 53.6 | 86% |
| Feb | 54 | 87% |
| Mar | 62.1 | 100% |
| Apr | 54.7 | 88% |
| May | 55.1 | 89% |
| Jun | 54 | 87% |
| Jul | 56.3 | 91% |
| Aug | 57.1 | 92% |
| Sep | 55 | 89% |
| Oct | 61.2 | 99% |
| Nov | 45.5 | 73% |
| Dec | 45.5 | 73% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.4x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress shows moderate geographic concentration — the top 5 ZIP codes represent 45.8% of filings.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47630 | Newburgh | 1134 | 25.9% | $239,300 |
| 47601 | Boonville | 560 | 12.8% | $140,600 |
| 47610 | Chandler | 185 | 4.2% | $142,550 |
| 47613 | Elberfeld | 72 | 1.6% | $156,402 |
| 47637 | Tennyson | 57 | 1.3% | $135,300 |
| 47619 | Lynnville | 53 | 1.2% | $152,750 |
| 47523 | Dale | 19 | 0.4% | $116,444 |
| 47537 | Gentryville | 8 | 0.2% | $163,910 |
Top 8 of 8 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (86%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1739 | 15.9% |
| Probate | 1268 | 17.3% |
| Guardianship | 524 | 9.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 483 | 9.1% |
| Partition | 367 | 8.4% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's name and property details; owner phone lookups where offered.
Distress composition and shifts
The distress mix is stable across all case types. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 36.1% | 39.8% | -3.7pp |
| Probate | 29.5% | 28.9% | +0.6pp |
| Guardianship | 15.6% | 11.9% | +3.7pp |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 13.9% | 10.9% | +3.0pp |
| Partition | 4.9% | 8.5% | -3.6pp |
Distress diversity score: 2.08 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Court Docket Activity
Across 3706 tracked cases, the average case has 23 docket entries (median 16). 52.5% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Divorce cases are the most court-active at 29.0 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.
| Activity level | Cases | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Early stage (1-5 events) | 350 | 9.4% |
| Mid-process (6-15 events) | 1411 | 38.1% |
| Advanced (16+ events) | 1945 | 52.5% |
Docket activity by case type
| Case type | Avg. events | Cases tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 29.0 | 1635 |
| Guardianship | 24.0 | 433 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 23.9 | 428 |
| Probate | 13.9 | 1210 |
Based on 3706 cases with docket event tracking from Warrick County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.
Procedural Stage Pipeline
Of 14 tracked cases, 21.4% reached the service-of-process stage, 35.7% progressed to a hearing. The largest procedural drop-off occurs between response filed and hearing scheduled (16.7% of cases do not advance).
| Terminal outcome | Cases | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | 3 | 21.4% | |
| Judgment entered | 1 | 7.1% | |
| Settled | 1 | 7.1% |
Progression by case type
| Case type | Cases | Served | Hearing | Resolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 7 | 28.6% | 42.9% | 14.3% |
Based on 14 cases with 22 recorded stage transitions from Warrick County court docket entries. Stages identified from docket events: service of process, responses, hearings, judgments, settlements, and dismissals.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $199,558. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $213,156), while Pre-Foreclosure filings trend lower (median $172,400). The largest segment (54.7%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 375 | 14.0% |
| $100K - $250K | 1466 | 54.7% |
| $250K - $500K | 692 | 25.8% |
| $500K - $1M | 136 | 5.1% |
| Over $1M | 9 | 0.3% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $213,156 | $244,941 | 1098 |
| Probate | $203,840 | $238,450 | 846 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $172,400 | $190,178 | 419 |
| Guardianship | $188,500 | $216,818 | 231 |
| Partition | $179,400 | $219,618 | 84 |
Based on county assessor records for 2678 properties with court filings (61.1% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 8 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 47630 (Newburgh) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (1134 cases). 3 of 8 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 46.
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 47630 | Newburgh |
75
|
1134 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 47601 | Boonville |
57
|
560 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 47610 | Chandler |
46
|
185 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 47613 | Elberfeld |
42
|
72 | — | 0% |
| #5 | 47637 | Tennyson |
42
|
57 | — | 0% |
| #6 | 47619 | Lynnville |
41
|
53 | — | 0% |
| #7 | 47523 | Dale |
40
|
19 | — | 0% |
| #8 | 47537 | Gentryville |
25
|
8 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 4381 court filings across 8 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$618,891,206 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 2678 court-filed properties. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($268,945,124 across 1098 properties).
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $268,945,124 | 1098 | $244,941 | -- |
| Probate | $201,728,534 | 846 | $238,450 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $79,684,622 | 419 | $190,178 | -- |
| Guardianship | $50,085,038 | 231 | $216,818 | -- |
| Partition | $18,447,888 | 84 | $219,618 | -- |
Based on 2678 properties with assessor valuations (61.1% of 4381 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
4,202 court filings tracked with 2,028 resolved (48.3% absorption rate). Resolved cases take an average of 382 days. Guardianship cases resolve fastest (avg 344 days), while Pre-Foreclosure cases take longest (avg 442 days).
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 60 | 21 | +39 | 35.0% | |
| Feb 2020 | 74 | 25 | +49 | 33.8% | |
| Mar 2020 | 52 | 18 | +34 | 34.6% | |
| Apr 2020 | 33 | 11 | +22 | 33.3% | |
| May 2020 | 49 | 20 | +29 | 40.8% | |
| Jun 2020 | 41 | 15 | +26 | 36.6% | |
| Jul 2020 | 63 | 21 | +42 | 33.3% | |
| Aug 2020 | 47 | 15 | +32 | 31.9% | |
| Sep 2020 | 59 | 21 | +38 | 35.6% | |
| Oct 2020 | 66 | 25 | +41 | 37.9% | |
| Nov 2020 | 40 | 17 | +23 | 42.5% | |
| Dec 2020 | 53 | 18 | +35 | 34.0% | |
| Jan 2021 | 54 | 19 | +35 | 35.2% | |
| Feb 2021 | 50 | 23 | +27 | 46.0% | |
| Mar 2021 | 61 | 31 | +30 | 50.8% | |
| Apr 2021 | 57 | 30 | +27 | 52.6% | |
| May 2021 | 59 | 24 | +35 | 40.7% | |
| Jun 2021 | 47 | 26 | +21 | 55.3% | |
| Jul 2021 | 57 | 32 | +25 | 56.1% | |
| Aug 2021 | 52 | 24 | +28 | 46.2% | |
| Sep 2021 | 48 | 28 | +20 | 58.3% | |
| Oct 2021 | 67 | 29 | +38 | 43.3% | |
| Nov 2021 | 52 | 28 | +24 | 53.8% | |
| Dec 2021 | 42 | 18 | +24 | 42.9% | |
| Jan 2022 | 42 | 16 | +26 | 38.1% | |
| Feb 2022 | 41 | 17 | +24 | 41.5% | |
| Mar 2022 | 81 | 35 | +46 | 43.2% | |
| Apr 2022 | 61 | 29 | +32 | 47.5% | |
| May 2022 | 48 | 29 | +19 | 60.4% | |
| Jun 2022 | 69 | 26 | +43 | 37.7% | |
| Jul 2022 | 52 | 31 | +21 | 59.6% | |
| Aug 2022 | 62 | 37 | +25 | 59.7% | |
| Sep 2022 | 65 | 36 | +29 | 55.4% | |
| Oct 2022 | 54 | 27 | +27 | 50.0% | |
| Nov 2022 | 53 | 29 | +24 | 54.7% | |
| Dec 2022 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 59.5% | |
| Jan 2023 | 59 | 27 | +32 | 45.8% | |
| Feb 2023 | 46 | 33 | +13 | 71.7% | |
| Mar 2023 | 55 | 20 | +35 | 36.4% | |
| Apr 2023 | 50 | 23 | +27 | 46.0% | |
| May 2023 | 55 | 28 | +27 | 50.9% | |
| Jun 2023 | 64 | 39 | +25 | 60.9% | |
| Jul 2023 | 57 | 38 | +19 | 66.7% | |
| Aug 2023 | 70 | 35 | +35 | 50.0% | |
| Sep 2023 | 52 | 29 | +23 | 55.8% | |
| Oct 2023 | 62 | 29 | +33 | 46.8% | |
| Nov 2023 | 38 | 20 | +18 | 52.6% | |
| Dec 2023 | 41 | 20 | +21 | 48.8% | |
| Jan 2024 | 48 | 29 | +19 | 60.4% | |
| Feb 2024 | 57 | 37 | +20 | 64.9% | |
| Mar 2024 | 49 | 27 | +22 | 55.1% | |
| Apr 2024 | 58 | 35 | +23 | 60.3% | |
| May 2024 | 55 | 34 | +21 | 61.8% | |
| Jun 2024 | 36 | 21 | +15 | 58.3% | |
| Jul 2024 | 39 | 23 | +16 | 59.0% | |
| Aug 2024 | 53 | 24 | +29 | 45.3% | |
| Sep 2024 | 42 | 26 | +16 | 61.9% | |
| Oct 2024 | 61 | 40 | +21 | 65.6% | |
| Nov 2024 | 42 | 26 | +16 | 61.9% | |
| Dec 2024 | 40 | 28 | +12 | 70.0% | |
| Jan 2025 | 50 | 29 | +21 | 58.0% | |
| Feb 2025 | 49 | 34 | +15 | 69.4% | |
| Mar 2025 | 60 | 35 | +25 | 58.3% | |
| Apr 2025 | 54 | 31 | +23 | 57.4% | |
| May 2025 | 57 | 34 | +23 | 59.6% | |
| Jun 2025 | 47 | 29 | +18 | 61.7% | |
| Jul 2025 | 46 | 20 | +26 | 43.5% | |
| Aug 2025 | 37 | 21 | +16 | 56.8% | |
| Sep 2025 | 54 | 30 | +24 | 55.6% | |
| Oct 2025 | 51 | 30 | +21 | 58.8% | |
| Nov 2025 | 40 | 20 | +20 | 50.0% | |
| Dec 2025 | 53 | 23 | +30 | 43.4% | |
| Jan 2026 | 51 | 26 | +25 | 51.0% | |
| Feb 2026 | 51 | 30 | +21 | 58.8% | |
| Mar 2026 | 70 | 28 | +42 | 40.0% | |
| Apr 2026 | 59 | 21 | +38 | 35.6% | |
| May 2026 | 54 | 12 | +42 | 22.2% | |
| Jun 2026 | 51 | 7 | +44 | 13.7% | |
| Jul 2026 | 50 | 4 | +46 | 8.0% | |
| Aug 2026 | 41 | 0 | +41 | 0.0% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1710 | 1324 | 77.4% | 364 |
| Probate | 1248 | 119 | 9.5% | 402 |
| Guardianship | 501 | 274 | 54.7% | 344 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 469 | 311 | 66.3% | 442 |
| Partition | 274 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 2028 resolved cases out of 4202 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
71.8% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (21.9%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 1,842 | 71.8% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 562 | 21.9% | |
| Agricultural | 82 | 3.2% | |
| Residential | 68 | 2.6% | |
| Commercial | 12 | 0.5% | |
| Industrial | 1 | 0.0% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 74.4% | 1,050 |
| Probate | Single Family | 64.7% | 819 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 84.6% | 397 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 65.0% | 226 |
| Partition | Single Family | 64.0% | 75 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 2,567 properties (61.1% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
1,804 cases (42.9%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Guardianship cases resolve fastest (median 228 days), while Pre-Foreclosure cases take longest (median 420 days). 4 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 87 | 4 | 83 | 4.6% |
| 3-6 months | 163 | 40 | 123 | 24.5% |
| 6-12 months | 319 | 159 | 160 | 49.8% |
| 1-2 years | 599 | 358 | 241 | 59.8% |
| 2+ years | 3,030 | 1,467 | 1,563 | 48.4% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1,710 | 1324 | 77.4% | 271d |
| Probate | 1,248 | 119 | 9.5% | 371d |
| Guardianship | 501 | 274 | 54.7% | 228d |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 469 | 311 | 66.3% | 420d |
| Partition | 274 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
2,671 filings (63.6% of scope) have year-built data. 2000+ properties are most common (42%). Newer properties (2000+) average $2,714,901 — 24.4x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($111,313). 2000+ cases resolve fastest (median 270d) vs Pre-1960 (378d).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 269 | 10.1% | $111,313 | 378d |
| 1960–1979 | 436 | 16.3% | $179,490 | 371d |
| 1980–1999 | 837 | 31.3% | $207,546 | 282d |
| 2000+ | 1,129 | 42.3% | $2,714,901 | 270d |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $2,714,901 — 24.39x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($111,313).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Municipality filing concentration in Warrick County
Court filings in Warrick County span 178 municipalities. Newburgh leads with 1256 filings (43.7% of total), predominantly Divorce (47.6%). Filing activity is geographically concentrated — the top 3 municipalities account for 75% of all filings.
| Municipality | Filings | Share | Top case type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newburgh | 1256 | 43.7% | Divorce (47.6%) |
| Boonville | 669 | 23.3% | Divorce (40.7%) |
| Chandler | 241 | 8.4% | Divorce (42.7%) |
| Evansville | 181 | 6.3% | Divorce (68.5%) |
| Elberfeld | 77 | 2.7% | Divorce (44.2%) |
| Lynnville | 67 | 2.3% | Divorce (43.3%) |
| Tennyson | 60 | 2.1% | Divorce (38.3%) |
| Dale | 27 | 0.9% | Divorce (55.6%) |
| Henderson | 15 | 0.5% | Divorce (46.7%) |
| Owensboro | 13 | 0.5% | Divorce (92.3%) |
| Richland | 10 | 0.3% | Divorce (70.0%) |
| Indianapolis | 10 | 0.3% | Probate (50.0%) |
| Rockport | 10 | 0.3% | Divorce (50.0%) |
| Gentryville | 8 | 0.3% | Divorce (37.5%) |
| Princeton | 6 | 0.2% | Divorce (83.3%) |
Top 15 of 178 municipalities with court filings. Data from 2,871 filings (68% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 18 comparable quarters show 2,828 tracked filings in Warrick County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 164) was stable vs prior (2026 Q1: 172, -4.7%). Partition shows the largest composition shift, declining share from 7.2% to 3.7%.
| Quarter | Total | Divorce | Probate | Pre-Foreclosure | Guardianship |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 164 | 54 (32.9%) | 47 (28.7%) | 21 (12.8%) | 12 (7.3%) |
| 2022 Q2 | 178 | 64 (36.0%) | 52 (29.2%) | 28 (15.7%) | 23 (12.9%) |
| 2022 Q3 | 179 | 82 (45.8%) | 51 (28.5%) | 23 (12.8%) | 14 (7.8%) |
| 2022 Q4 | 144 | 60 (41.7%) | 43 (29.9%) | 17 (11.8%) | 16 (11.1%) |
| 2023 Q1 | 160 | 47 (29.4%) | 49 (30.6%) | 30 (18.8%) | 20 (12.5%) |
| 2023 Q2 | 169 | 70 (41.4%) | 45 (26.6%) | 20 (11.8%) | 20 (11.8%) |
| 2023 Q3 | 179 | 85 (47.5%) | 53 (29.6%) | 15 (8.4%) | 19 (10.6%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 141 | 62 (44.0%) | 35 (24.8%) | 17 (12.1%) | 15 (10.6%) |
| 2024 Q1 | 154 | 64 (41.6%) | 49 (31.8%) | 28 (18.2%) | 13 (8.4%) |
| 2024 Q2 | 149 | 70 (47.0%) | 52 (34.9%) | 10 (6.7%) | 15 (10.1%) |
| 2024 Q3 | 134 | 53 (39.6%) | 42 (31.3%) | 17 (12.7%) | 18 (13.4%) |
| 2024 Q4 | 143 | 62 (43.4%) | 42 (29.4%) | 21 (14.7%) | 17 (11.9%) |
| 2025 Q1 | 159 | 66 (41.5%) | 45 (28.3%) | 26 (16.4%) | 15 (9.4%) |
| 2025 Q2 | 158 | 58 (36.7%) | 42 (26.6%) | 27 (17.1%) | 25 (15.8%) |
| 2025 Q3 | 137 | 53 (38.7%) | 47 (34.3%) | 9 (6.6%) | 21 (15.3%) |
| 2025 Q4 | 144 | 58 (40.3%) | 33 (22.9%) | 24 (16.7%) | 22 (15.3%) |
| 2026 Q1 | 172 | 69 (40.1%) | 44 (25.6%) | 29 (16.9%) | 22 (12.8%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 164 | 68 (41.5%) | 46 (28.0%) | 27 (16.5%) | 15 (9.1%) |
Composition shift: Partition filings are declining share, moving from 7.2% to 3.7% of total filings (-3.5 percentage points).
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $183,900, with the largest concentration (25.5%) in the $200K–$300K range. Divorce filings have the highest median value ($193,300) while Partition filings are lowest ($131,400).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 163 | 5.7% | |
| $50K–$100K | 337 | 11.8% | |
| $100K–$150K | 543 | 19.1% | |
| $150K–$200K | 559 | 19.6% | |
| $200K–$300K | 726 | 25.5% | |
| $300K–$500K | 377 | 13.2% | |
| $500K+ | 142 | 5.0% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $193,300 | $253,058 | 1,154 |
| Probate | $187,500 | $238,315 | 904 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $167,950 | $180,442 | 426 |
| Guardianship | $191,250 | $15,340,406 | 268 |
| Partition | $131,400 | $169,311 | 95 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 2,847 properties (67.8% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 4.5 years (25.6% held 10+ years). Probate cases show the longest tenure (5.3 yr median) vs. Pre-Foreclosure (4.1 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 241 | 24.1% | |
| 2–5 years | 298 | 29.8% | |
| 5–10 years | 205 | 20.5% | |
| 10–20 years | 203 | 20.3% | |
| 20+ years | 53 | 5.3% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 4.3 yr | 6.4 yr | 446 |
| Probate | 5.3 yr | 8.8 yr | 224 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 4.1 yr | 6.5 yr | 180 |
| Guardianship | 4.6 yr | 6.4 yr | 111 |
| Partition | 4.1 yr | 6.9 yr | 39 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 1,000 properties (23.8% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Warrick County
Of 3,933 unique property owners in court filings, 210 (5.3%) appear in multiple cases, including 35 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 11 cases spanning 57 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 17.8%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 64 | 1662 | 3.9% |
| Probate | 69 | 1190 | 5.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 43 | 429 | 10.0% |
| Guardianship | 76 | 426 | 17.8% |
| Partition | 4 | 272 | 1.5% |
Analysis based on 3,933 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Serial distressed properties in Warrick County
Of 2,604 unique properties in court filings, 220 (8.4%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.2 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 17 months. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 20.7%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 96 | 1112 | 8.6% |
| Probate | 76 | 856 | 8.9% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 69 | 396 | 17.4% |
| Guardianship | 46 | 222 | 20.7% |
| Partition | 16 | 101 | 15.8% |
Analysis based on 2,604 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 2,744 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 14.2% (median land value $27,600, median improvement value $162,700). 91 properties (3.3%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Partition cases skew most land-heavy (median 16.0%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (13.5%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 518 | 18.9% |
| 10–20% | 1,536 | 56.0% |
| 20–30% | 405 | 14.8% |
| 30–50% | 194 | 7.1% |
| 50–70% | 48 | 1.7% |
| Over 70% | 43 | 1.6% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1,119 | 13.7% |
| Probate | 866 | 15.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 420 | 13.5% |
| Guardianship | 260 | 15.7% |
| Partition | 79 | 16.0% |
Analysis of 2,744 properties (65.3% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Prior sale value trajectory
Across 967 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -17.4%. 709 properties (73.3%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -11.3% value change vs -5.6% for long-hold (10+ yr). Partition cases have the highest underwater rate (81.8%) while Pre-Foreclosure has the lowest (59.3%).
Value change distribution
| Value change bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 50%+ loss | 104 | 10.8% |
| 20–50% loss | 336 | 34.7% |
| 0–20% loss | 269 | 27.8% |
| 0–20% gain | 89 | 9.2% |
| 20–50% gain | 72 | 7.4% |
| 50–100% gain | 36 | 3.7% |
| 100%+ gain | 61 | 6.3% |
Holding period vs value change
(195 properties)
(34 properties)
Value trajectory by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median change | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 464 | -19.2% | 78.7% |
| Probate | 249 | -18.5% | 73.1% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 182 | -7.2% | 59.3% |
| Guardianship | 39 | -17.0% | 69.2% |
| Partition | 33 | -39.9% | 81.8% |
Analysis of 967 properties (23.0% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Warrick County court records, which are public information.
- This dataset is the court-filing archive as collected from the county docket. The owner-of-record match and the entity-owner screen are applied to delivered leads, not to these filing counts.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (60% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-09-28 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Warrick County
Where filings concentrate inside Warrick County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Newburgh | 861 | 54.9% |
| Boonville | 415 | 26.5% |
| Chandler | 132 | 8.4% |
| Elberfeld | 52 | 3.3% |
| Tennyson | 43 | 2.7% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Warrick County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Warrick County filings
Subscribe to Warrick County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. 7-day free trial.
View Warrick County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Warrick County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-09-28, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/warrick-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)