Posey County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Posey County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-15. See methodology.
- Filing volume cooling (-14.5%) — last 2 complete months (47 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (55 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 6.3% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $13,356/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $212,718 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 40.6% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Posey County during the observed window.
About Posey County
Posey County is the southernmost, southwesternmost, and westernmost county in the U.S. state of Indiana. Its southern border is formed by the Ohio River, and its western border by the Wabash River, a tributary to the Ohio. As of 2020, the population was 25,222. The county seat is Mount Vernon. Posey County is part of the Evansville, Indiana metropolitan statistical area. The Ports of Indiana-Mount Vernon, on the Ohio River, is the seventh-largest inland port complex in the nation. Mechanization of dock technology has altered the number of workers at the port, but Posey County is still the seve
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
1334 verified property-related court filings tracked across 61 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
#11 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
1% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (14 of 1334 filings).
$212,718 median estimated property value across the 42 filings with property-enrichment data (3% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 40.6% | |
| Probate | 387 | 29.0% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 11.8% | |
| Guardianship | 138 | 10.3% | |
| Partition | 108 | 8.1% | |
| Inherited Property | 2 | 0.1% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Posey County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 22 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 15 | -7 | |
| Mar 2020 | 17 | +2 | |
| Apr 2020 | 15 | -2 | |
| May 2020 | 21 | +6 | |
| Jun 2020 | 36 | +15 | |
| Jul 2020 | 16 | -20 | |
| Aug 2020 | 22 | +6 | |
| Sep 2020 | 21 | -1 | |
| Oct 2020 | 27 | +6 | |
| Nov 2020 | 16 | -11 | |
| Dec 2020 | 24 | +8 | |
| Jan 2021 | 15 | -9 | |
| Feb 2021 | 22 | +7 | |
| Mar 2021 | 30 | +8 | |
| Apr 2021 | 23 | -7 | |
| May 2021 | 26 | +3 | |
| Jun 2021 | 17 | -9 | |
| Jul 2021 | 19 | +2 | |
| Aug 2021 | 14 | -5 | |
| Sep 2021 | 21 | +7 | |
| Oct 2021 | 29 | +8 | |
| Nov 2021 | 21 | -8 | |
| Dec 2021 | 20 | -1 | |
| Jan 2022 | 24 | +4 | |
| Feb 2022 | 21 | -3 | |
| Mar 2022 | 37 | +16 | |
| Apr 2022 | 24 | -13 | |
| May 2022 | 21 | -3 | |
| Jun 2022 | 28 | +7 | |
| Jul 2022 | 22 | -6 | |
| Aug 2022 | 21 | -1 | |
| Sep 2022 | 21 | 0 | |
| Oct 2022 | 18 | -3 | |
| Nov 2022 | 19 | +1 | |
| Dec 2022 | 18 | -1 | |
| Jan 2023 | 15 | -3 | |
| Feb 2023 | 17 | +2 | |
| Mar 2023 | 26 | +9 | |
| Apr 2023 | 34 | +8 | |
| May 2023 | 26 | -8 | |
| Jun 2023 | 29 | +3 | |
| Jul 2023 | 17 | -12 | |
| Aug 2023 | 23 | +6 | |
| Sep 2023 | 22 | -1 | |
| Oct 2023 | 27 | +5 | |
| Nov 2023 | 17 | -10 | |
| Dec 2023 | 17 | 0 | |
| May 2024 | 24 | +7 | |
| Dec 2024 | 12 | -12 | |
| Feb 2025 | 24 | +12 | |
| Mar 2025 | 26 | +2 | |
| May 2025 | 18 | -8 | |
| Jun 2025 | 19 | +1 | |
| Sep 2025 | 21 | +2 | |
| Oct 2025 | 23 | +2 | |
| Jan 2026 | 19 | -4 | |
| Mar 2026 | 36 | +17 | |
| Apr 2026 | 28 | -8 | |
| Jun 2026 | 19 | -9 | |
| Jul 2026 | 12 | -7 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 5 ZIPs in Posey County account for 2.4% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47620 | Mt Vernon | 20 | 1.5% | |
| 47712 | Evansville | 5 | 0.4% | |
| 47633 | Poseyville | 3 | 0.2% | |
| 47638 | Wadesville | 3 | 0.2% | |
| 47612 | Cynthiana | 1 | 0.1% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (2% of Posey County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 1 | 2.4% | |
| $75k - $150k | 9 | 21.4% | |
| $150k - $250k | 16 | 38.1% | |
| $250k - $400k | 10 | 23.8% | |
| $400k+ | 6 | 14.3% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (3% coverage on Posey County filings). Median $212,718; mean $241,873.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Posey County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 2 | 0.1% | |
| Mon | 292 | 21.9% | |
| Tue | 242 | 18.1% | |
| Wed | 269 | 20.2% | |
| Thu | 258 | 19.3% | |
| Fri | 265 | 19.9% | |
| Sat | 6 | 0.4% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 1334 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 40 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 1982 |
| Median living area | 1,630 sqft |
| Median lot size | 1.25 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 11081 Posey County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Posey County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 7.3% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 63.4% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 11.6% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 83.4% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 20.3% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Posey County sits within the Evansville, IN. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $853 |
| 1-bedroom | $860 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,113 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,370 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,539 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Posey County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 41 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -10.9% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 100.0% |
| Single-family units permitted | 41 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 0 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Posey County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Local-market benchmark
Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:
| Indicator | Filing-weighted average |
|---|---|
| Median household income (where filings cluster) | $72,579 |
| Median home value | $199,521 |
| Owner-occupancy rate | 75.1% |
| Renter share of households | 24.9% |
| Median gross rent | $783/mo |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 3 top ZIPs.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Posey County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING | 1 |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 1 |
| DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Posey County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Posey County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 41 filings (3.1% of all 1334 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Time from filing to sale
How quickly do distressed properties sell after a court filing is recorded? This distribution shows where post-filing sales cluster.
| Timeframe | Sales | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 30 days | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 31–90 days | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 91–180 days | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 181–365 days | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Over 1 year | 1 | 25.0% |
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Tracked | Sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Foreclosure | 6 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Divorce | 19 | 3 | 15.8% |
| Probate | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Guardianship | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 75.0% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 3 | 75.0% |
| Pre-existing | Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded | 1 | 25.0% |
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 41 of 1334 filings (3.1% parcel coverage). Timing based on 4 sales with valid filing and sale dates. Prices based on 3 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Posey County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 40.6% | +86.7% |
| Probate | 387 | 29.0% | +21.1% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 11.8% | +7.7% |
| Guardianship | 138 | 10.3% | +25.0% |
| Partition | 108 | 8.1% | -25.0% |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Nov. The 1.6x peak-to-trough ratio suggests strong seasonal patterns — investors who time their outreach around Mar can reach more distressed homeowners.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 19 | 66% |
| Feb | 19.8 | 69% |
| Mar | 28.7 | 100% |
| Apr | 24.8 | 86% |
| May | 22.7 | 79% |
| Jun | 24.7 | 86% |
| Jul | 18.5 | 64% |
| Aug | 20 | 70% |
| Sep | 21.2 | 74% |
| Oct | 24.8 | 86% |
| Nov | 18.2 | 63% |
| Dec | 18.2 | 63% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.6x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 5 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating. 2 of the top hotspots have high-equity properties (>40% equity), signaling potential value-add or wholesale opportunities.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | High equity | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47620 | Mt Vernon | 20 | 1.5% | 50% | $218,345 |
| 47712 | Evansville | 5 | 0.4% | 0% | $298,150 |
| 47633 | Poseyville | 3 | 0.2% | 0% | $215,807 |
| 47638 | Wadesville | 3 | 0.2% | 100% | $321,129 |
| 47612 | Cynthiana | 1 | 0.1% | 0% | $105,200 |
Top 5 of 5 ZIP codes with filings. High equity = properties with estimated equity above 40% (from third-party enrichment).
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (99%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 0.9% |
| Probate | 387 | 1.3% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 0.6% |
| Guardianship | 138 | 2.2% |
| Partition | 108 | 0.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. Probate share is declining. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 36.2% | 40.7% | -4.5pp |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 23.4% | 11.3% | +12.1pp (rising) |
| Probate | 14.9% | 29.6% | -14.7pp (falling) |
| Guardianship | 12.8% | 10.3% | +2.5pp |
| Partition | 8.5% | 8.2% | +0.3pp |
| Inherited Property | 4.3% | 0.0% | +4.3pp |
Distress diversity score: 2.31 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline
0.1% of tracked cases have reached a resolution. The most common resolution is judgment entered (1 cases, 50% of resolved).
Detailed disposition breakdown
| Disposition | Count | % of Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| Agreed Order | 1 | 50.0% |
| Dissolution Decree | 1 | 50.0% |
Outcomes by Case Type
| Case Type | Cases | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Median Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 2 | 0.4% | — |
| Probate | 387 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Guardianship | 138 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Partition | 108 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Based on 1334 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 1332 cases are still active or pending resolution.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $209,629. Probate filings involve the highest-value properties (median $293,164), while Pre-Foreclosure filings trend lower (median $154,900). The largest segment (54.5%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 4 | 9.1% |
| $100K - $250K | 24 | 54.5% |
| $250K - $500K | 14 | 31.8% |
| $500K - $1M | 2 | 4.5% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $238,962 | $257,784 | 21 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $154,900 | $160,592 | 9 |
| Probate | $293,164 | $292,124 | 8 |
Based on county assessor records for 44 properties with court filings (3.3% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 4 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 47620 (Mount Vernon) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (20 cases).
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 47620 | Mount Vernon |
75
|
20 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 47633 | Poseyville |
40
|
3 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 47712 | Evansville |
29
|
5 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 47638 | Wadesville |
25
|
3 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 1334 court filings across 4 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$10,189,880 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 44 court-filed properties. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($5,413,457 across 21 properties). 7 high-equity distressed properties ($1,717,099 total) represent the highest-value investor targets.
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $5,413,457 | 21 | $257,784 | 100.0% |
| Probate | $2,336,994 | 8 | $292,124 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $1,445,329 | 9 | $160,592 | -- |
| Guardianship | $724,300 | 4 | $181,075 | -- |
Based on 44 properties with assessor valuations (3.3% of 1334 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
1,334 court filings tracked with 2 resolved (0.1% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 1,332 active cases. Resolved cases take an average of 57 days.
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2020 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2020 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2020 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| May 2020 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2020 | 36 | 0 | +36 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2020 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2020 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2020 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2020 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2020 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2020 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2021 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2021 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2021 | 30 | 0 | +30 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2021 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| May 2021 | 26 | 0 | +26 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2021 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2021 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2021 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2021 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2021 | 29 | 0 | +29 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2021 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2021 | 20 | 0 | +20 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2022 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2022 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2022 | 37 | 0 | +37 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2022 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| May 2022 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2022 | 28 | 0 | +28 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2022 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2022 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2022 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2022 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2022 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2022 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2023 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2023 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2023 | 26 | 0 | +26 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2023 | 34 | 0 | +34 | 0.0% | |
| May 2023 | 26 | 0 | +26 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2023 | 29 | 0 | +29 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2023 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2023 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2023 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2023 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2023 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2023 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| May 2024 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2024 | 12 | 0 | +12 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2025 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2025 | 26 | 0 | +26 | 0.0% | |
| May 2025 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2025 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2025 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2025 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2026 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2026 | 36 | 2 | +34 | 5.6% | |
| Apr 2026 | 28 | 0 | +28 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2026 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2026 | 12 | 0 | +12 | 0.0% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 2 | 0.4% | 57 |
| Probate | 387 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Guardianship | 138 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Partition | 108 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 2 resolved cases out of 1334 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
51.5% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Residential (27.3%). Notably, Probate filings skew toward Duplex/Multi-Family (28.6%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 17 | 51.5% | |
| Residential | 9 | 27.3% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 5 | 15.2% | |
| Agricultural | 2 | 6.1% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 50.0% | 14 |
| Probate | Duplex/Multi-Family | 28.6% | 7 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 50.0% | 6 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 33 properties (2.5% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
1,176 cases (88.2%) have been active for over a year without resolution. 18 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% |
| 3-6 months | 59 | 2 | 57 | 3.4% |
| 6-12 months | 56 | 0 | 56 | 0.0% |
| 1-2 years | 99 | 0 | 99 | 0.0% |
| 2+ years | 1,077 | 0 | 1,077 | 0.0% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 541 | 2 | 0.4% | — |
| Probate | 387 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 158 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Guardianship | 138 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Partition | 108 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 15 comparable quarters show 801 tracked filings in Posey County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 47) was declining vs prior (2026 Q1: 55, -14.5%). Probate shows the largest composition shift, growing share from 25.3% to 28.9%.
| Quarter | Total | Divorce | Probate | Pre-Foreclosure | Guardianship |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 82 | 31 (37.8%) | 19 (23.2%) | 8 (9.8%) | 11 (13.4%) |
| 2022 Q2 | 73 | 29 (39.7%) | 22 (30.1%) | 12 (16.4%) | 4 (5.5%) |
| 2022 Q3 | 64 | 24 (37.5%) | 18 (28.1%) | 12 (18.8%) | 6 (9.4%) |
| 2022 Q4 | 55 | 24 (43.6%) | 9 (16.4%) | 11 (20.0%) | 6 (10.9%) |
| 2023 Q1 | 58 | 19 (32.8%) | 16 (27.6%) | 8 (13.8%) | 7 (12.1%) |
| 2023 Q2 | 89 | 31 (34.8%) | 23 (25.8%) | 18 (20.2%) | 6 (6.7%) |
| 2023 Q3 | 62 | 28 (45.2%) | 15 (24.2%) | 11 (17.7%) | 3 (4.8%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 61 | 24 (39.3%) | 20 (32.8%) | 6 (9.8%) | 8 (13.1%) |
| 2024 Q2 | 24 | 10 (41.7%) | 8 (33.3%) | 4 (16.7%) | — |
| 2025 Q1 | 50 | 21 (42.0%) | 11 (22.0%) | 5 (10.0%) | 10 (20.0%) |
| 2025 Q2 | 37 | 15 (40.5%) | 11 (29.7%) | 6 (16.2%) | 3 (8.1%) |
| 2025 Q3 | 21 | 4 (19.0%) | 5 (23.8%) | 4 (19.0%) | 4 (19.0%) |
| 2025 Q4 | 23 | 4 (17.4%) | 10 (43.5%) | 6 (26.1%) | 1 (4.3%) |
| 2026 Q1 | 55 | 18 (32.7%) | 20 (36.4%) | 6 (10.9%) | 7 (12.7%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 47 | 17 (36.2%) | 7 (14.9%) | 11 (23.4%) | 6 (12.8%) |
Composition shift: Probate filings are growing share, moving from 25.3% to 28.9% of total filings (+3.7 percentage points).
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $188,950, with the largest concentration (25.0%) in the $200K–$300K range.
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 5 | 13.9% | |
| $100K–$150K | 8 | 22.2% | |
| $150K–$200K | 7 | 19.4% | |
| $200K–$300K | 9 | 25.0% | |
| $300K–$500K | 5 | 13.9% | |
| $500K+ | 2 | 5.6% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $227,300 | $247,247 | 17 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 36 properties (2.7% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 6.9 years, with 31.8% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 1 | 4.5% | |
| 2–5 years | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 5–10 years | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 10–20 years | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 20+ years | 1 | 4.5% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8.5 yr | 10.0 yr | 12 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 22 properties (1.6% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Posey County
Of 1,156 unique property owners in court filings, 123 (10.6%) appear in multiple cases, including 25 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 9 cases spanning 70 months. Divorce cases have the highest repeat rate at 18.8%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 85 | 451 | 18.8% |
| Probate | 54 | 361 | 15.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2 | 156 | 1.3% |
| Guardianship | 23 | 123 | 18.7% |
| Partition | 3 | 107 | 2.8% |
Analysis based on 1,156 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 33 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 11.2% (median land value $22,800, median improvement value $174,600).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 12 | 36.4% |
| 10–20% | 15 | 45.5% |
| 20–30% | 4 | 12.1% |
| 30–50% | 2 | 6.1% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 16 | 11.4% |
Analysis of 33 properties (2.5% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Posey County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (3% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-15 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Posey County
Where filings concentrate inside Posey County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Mt Vernon | 12 | 37.5% |
| Mount Vernon | 7 | 21.9% |
| Evansville | 6 | 18.8% |
| Poseyville | 3 | 9.4% |
| Wadesville | 3 | 9.4% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Posey County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Posey County filings
Subscribe to Posey County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Posey County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Posey County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-15, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/posey-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)