Madison County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Madison County court dockets. Updated 2026-08-03. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+64.9%) — last 3 complete months (460 filings) vs prior 3 complete months (279 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 13.1% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $14,472/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $110,600 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 37.2% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Madison County during the observed window.
About Madison County
Madison County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. The 2020 census states the population is standing at 130,129. The county seat since 1836 has been Anderson, one of three incorporated cities within the county. Madison County is included in the Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
9355 verified property-related court filings tracked across 79 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
118 typical monthly filing volume.
11% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (999 of 9355 filings).
$110,600 median estimated property value across the 4660 filings with property-enrichment data (50% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3483 | 37.2% | |
| Probate | 2237 | 23.9% | |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 16.7% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1224 | 13.1% | |
| Partition | 840 | 9.0% | |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0.1% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Madison County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 165 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 156 | -9 | |
| Mar 2020 | 123 | -33 | |
| Apr 2020 | 68 | -55 | |
| May 2020 | 101 | +33 | |
| Jun 2020 | 123 | +22 | |
| Jul 2020 | 143 | +20 | |
| Aug 2020 | 144 | +1 | |
| Sep 2020 | 124 | -20 | |
| Oct 2020 | 113 | -11 | |
| Nov 2020 | 107 | -6 | |
| Dec 2020 | 116 | +9 | |
| Jan 2021 | 124 | +8 | |
| Feb 2021 | 114 | -10 | |
| Mar 2021 | 157 | +43 | |
| Apr 2021 | 139 | -18 | |
| May 2021 | 148 | +9 | |
| Jun 2021 | 132 | -16 | |
| Jul 2021 | 137 | +5 | |
| Aug 2021 | 131 | -6 | |
| Sep 2021 | 138 | +7 | |
| Oct 2021 | 121 | -17 | |
| Nov 2021 | 108 | -13 | |
| Dec 2021 | 96 | -12 | |
| Jan 2022 | 145 | +49 | |
| Feb 2022 | 134 | -11 | |
| Mar 2022 | 163 | +29 | |
| Apr 2022 | 148 | -15 | |
| May 2022 | 142 | -6 | |
| Jun 2022 | 156 | +14 | |
| Jul 2022 | 138 | -18 | |
| Aug 2022 | 151 | +13 | |
| Sep 2022 | 155 | +4 | |
| Oct 2022 | 146 | -9 | |
| Nov 2022 | 154 | +8 | |
| Dec 2022 | 118 | -36 | |
| Jan 2023 | 121 | +3 | |
| Feb 2023 | 134 | +13 | |
| Mar 2023 | 151 | +17 | |
| Apr 2023 | 116 | -35 | |
| May 2023 | 135 | +19 | |
| Jun 2023 | 150 | +15 | |
| Jul 2023 | 119 | -31 | |
| Aug 2023 | 154 | +35 | |
| Sep 2023 | 133 | -21 | |
| Oct 2023 | 130 | -3 | |
| Nov 2023 | 134 | +4 | |
| Dec 2023 | 96 | -38 | |
| Jan 2024 | 146 | +50 | |
| Feb 2024 | 84 | -62 | |
| Mar 2024 | 139 | +55 | |
| Apr 2024 | 77 | -62 | |
| May 2024 | 122 | +45 | |
| Jun 2024 | 80 | -42 | |
| Jul 2024 | 61 | -19 | |
| Aug 2024 | 108 | +47 | |
| Sep 2024 | 72 | -36 | |
| Oct 2024 | 115 | +43 | |
| Nov 2024 | 53 | -62 | |
| Dec 2024 | 73 | +20 | |
| Jan 2025 | 114 | +41 | |
| Feb 2025 | 82 | -32 | |
| Mar 2025 | 57 | -25 | |
| Apr 2025 | 88 | +31 | |
| May 2025 | 98 | +10 | |
| Jun 2025 | 78 | -20 | |
| Jul 2025 | 82 | +4 | |
| Aug 2025 | 115 | +33 | |
| Sep 2025 | 108 | -7 | |
| Oct 2025 | 57 | -51 | |
| Nov 2025 | 67 | +10 | |
| Dec 2025 | 86 | +19 | |
| Jan 2026 | 103 | +17 | |
| Feb 2026 | 67 | -36 | |
| Mar 2026 | 81 | +14 | |
| Apr 2026 | 131 | +50 | |
| May 2026 | 146 | +15 | |
| Jun 2026 | 168 | +22 | |
| Jul 2026 | 146 | -22 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 10 ZIPs in Madison County account for 36.4% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46011 | ANDERSON | 565 | 6.0% | |
| 46012 | ANDERSON | 555 | 5.9% | |
| 46013 | ANDERSON | 544 | 5.8% | |
| 46016 | ANDERSON | 500 | 5.3% | |
| 46064 | PENDLETON | 370 | 4.0% | |
| 46001 | ALEXANDRIA | 291 | 3.1% | |
| 46036 | ELWOOD | 281 | 3.0% | |
| 46017 | ANDERSON | 166 | 1.8% | |
| 46051 | LAPEL | 70 | 0.7% | |
| 46044 | FRANKTON | 62 | 0.7% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (39% of Madison County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 1161 | 24.9% | |
| $75k - $150k | 2108 | 45.2% | |
| $150k - $250k | 975 | 20.9% | |
| $250k - $400k | 298 | 6.4% | |
| $400k+ | 118 | 2.5% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (50% coverage on Madison County filings). Median $110,600; mean $146,407.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Madison County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 42 | 0.4% | |
| Mon | 1755 | 18.8% | |
| Tue | 1915 | 20.5% | |
| Wed | 1863 | 19.9% | |
| Thu | 1913 | 20.4% | |
| Fri | 1774 | 19.0% | |
| Sat | 93 | 1.0% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 9355 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 4935 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median living area | 1,668 sqft |
| Median bedrooms | 3 |
| Median bathrooms | 1.0 |
| Median lot size | 0.71 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 59075 Madison County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Madison County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 61.8% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 20.7% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 77.4% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 18.6% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Madison County sits within the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $898 |
| 1-bedroom | $919 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,206 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,594 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,597 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Madison County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 186 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | +0.0% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 100.0% |
| Single-family units permitted | 186 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 0 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Madison County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Madison County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC | 3 |
| NEWREZ LLC | 3 |
| U.S. BANK N.A. | 2 |
| U.S. BANK TRUST N.A | 2 |
| THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | 2 |
| ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC | 1 |
| WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB | 1 |
| NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A. | 1 |
| ASO EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC | 1 |
| PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Madison County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Madison County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 4941 filings (52.8% of all 9355 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Filings | Confirmed sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | 2237 | 456 | 20.4% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1224 | 203 | 16.6% |
| Divorce | 3483 | 488 | 14.0% |
| Partition | 840 | 55 | 6.5% |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 68 | 4.3% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 59.2% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 752 | 59.2% |
| Deferred | Sale happened well after the filing (over 1 year) — weaker filing connection | 323 | 25.4% |
| Concurrent | Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal | 147 | 11.6% |
| Pre-existing | Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded | 48 | 3.8% |
Who bought the property
Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.
| Buyer | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupant | 911 | 75.3% |
| Investor | 213 | 17.6% |
| Bank / auction | 78 | 6.4% |
| Government agency | 4 | 0.3% |
| Family / non-arm's-length | 4 | 0.3% |
Based on 1210 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 4941 of 9355 filings (52.8% parcel coverage). Prices based on 85 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Madison County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 126 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 123 | 97.6% |
| X-500yr | 2 | 1.6% |
| AE | 1 | 0.8% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 126 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3483 | 37.2% | +71.6% |
| Probate | 2237 | 23.9% | +37.3% |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 16.7% | +73.5% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1224 | 13.1% | +63.8% |
| Partition | 840 | 9.0% | +95.8% |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0.1% | -- |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| NEWREZ LLC | 8 | 16.3% |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC | 3 | 6.1% |
| THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | 3 | 6.1% |
| LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC | 3 | 6.1% |
| CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC | 3 | 6.1% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 49 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Aug and are lowest in Dec. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 131.1 | 98% |
| Feb | 110.1 | 82% |
| Mar | 124.4 | 93% |
| Apr | 109.6 | 82% |
| May | 127.4 | 95% |
| Jun | 126.7 | 95% |
| Jul | 118 | 88% |
| Aug | 133.8 | 100% |
| Sep | 121.7 | 91% |
| Oct | 113.7 | 85% |
| Nov | 103.8 | 78% |
| Dec | 97.5 | 73% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Aug), with a 1.4x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 30 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46011 | Anderson | 565 | 6.0% | $126,650 |
| 46012 | Anderson | 555 | 5.9% | $110,900 |
| 46013 | Anderson | 544 | 5.8% | $106,900 |
| 46016 | Anderson | 500 | 5.3% | $55,500 |
| 46064 | Pendleton | 370 | 4.0% | $234,943 |
| 46001 | Alexandria | 291 | 3.1% | $109,000 |
| 46036 | Elwood | 281 | 3.0% | $87,100 |
| 46017 | Anderson | 166 | 1.8% | $107,600 |
| 46051 | Lapel | 70 | 0.7% | $133,650 |
| 46044 | Frankton | 62 | 0.7% | $106,750 |
Top 10 of 30 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (89%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3483 | 11.1% |
| Probate | 2237 | 16.1% |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 5.9% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1224 | 8.1% |
| Partition | 840 | 7.0% |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 20.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 33.1% | 37.4% | -4.3pp |
| Probate | 23.2% | 23.9% | -0.7pp |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 19.4% | 12.9% | +6.5pp (rising) |
| Guardianship | 14.0% | 16.8% | -2.8pp |
| Partition | 9.2% | 9.0% | +0.2pp |
| Inherited Property | 1.0% | 0.0% | +1.0pp |
Distress diversity score: 2.26 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline
20.9% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 360 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is judgment entered (1486 cases, 76% of resolved).
| Resolution Type | Median Days | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Judgment | 384 | 310 |
| Dismissal | 232 | 40 |
| Settlement | 253 | 47 |
| Sheriff sale | 360 | 59 |
Detailed disposition breakdown
| Disposition | Count | % of Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| Final Judgment | 1486 | 76.1% |
| Court Dismissed | 217 | 11.1% |
| Sheriff Sale | 143 | 7.3% |
| Settlement | 106 | 5.4% |
Outcomes by Case Type
| Case Type | Cases | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Median Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3481 | 1123 | 32.3% | 394 |
| Probate | 2237 | 232 | 10.4% | 229 |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 349 | 22.3% | 423 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1223 | 248 | 20.3% | 309 |
| Partition | 840 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Based on 9352 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 7400 cases are still active or pending resolution.
Court Docket Activity
Across 4059 tracked cases, the average case has 29 docket entries (median 21). 71.8% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Pre-Foreclosure cases are the most court-active at 33.4 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.
| Activity level | Cases | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Early stage (1-5 events) | 57 | 1.4% |
| Mid-process (6-15 events) | 1089 | 26.8% |
| Advanced (16+ events) | 2913 | 71.8% |
Docket activity by case type
| Case type | Avg. events | Cases tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Foreclosure | 33.4 | 535 |
| Guardianship | 32.9 | 733 |
| Divorce | 31.7 | 1688 |
| Probate | 20.9 | 1103 |
Based on 4059 cases with docket event tracking from Madison County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $107,200. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $112,400), while Inherited Property filings trend lower (median $71,700). The largest segment (46.7%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 2158 | 44.6% |
| $100K - $250K | 2260 | 46.7% |
| $250K - $500K | 359 | 7.4% |
| $500K - $1M | 32 | 0.7% |
| Over $1M | 26 | 0.5% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $112,400 | $157,897 | 1826 |
| Probate | $110,980 | $127,438 | 1333 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $108,200 | $126,456 | 858 |
| Guardianship | $91,600 | $154,410 | 614 |
| Partition | $101,200 | $155,319 | 199 |
| Inherited Property | $71,700 | $72,800 | 5 |
Based on county assessor records for 4835 properties with court filings (51.7% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 18 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46011 (Anderson) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (565 cases). 7 of 18 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 51.
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 46011 | Anderson |
75
|
565 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 46012 | Anderson |
74
|
555 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 46013 | Anderson |
74
|
544 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 46016 | Anderson |
71
|
500 | — | 0% |
| #5 | 46064 | Pendleton |
63
|
370 | — | 0% |
| #6 | 46001 | Alexandria |
58
|
291 | — | 0% |
| #7 | 46036 | Elwood |
57
|
281 | — | 0% |
| #8 | 46017 | Anderson |
50
|
166 | — | 0% |
| #9 | 46044 | Frankton |
44
|
62 | — | 0% |
| #10 | 46051 | Lapel |
44
|
70 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 9355 court filings across 18 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$692,774,764 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 4835 court-filed properties. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($288,320,147 across 1826 properties).
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $288,320,147 | 1826 | $157,897 | -- |
| Probate | $169,875,160 | 1333 | $127,438 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $108,499,395 | 858 | $126,456 | -- |
| Guardianship | $94,807,587 | 614 | $154,410 | -- |
| Partition | $30,908,475 | 199 | $155,319 | -- |
| Inherited Property | $364,000 | 5 | $72,800 | -- |
Based on 4835 properties with assessor valuations (51.7% of 9355 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
9,352 court filings tracked with 1,952 resolved (20.9% absorption rate). Resolved cases take an average of 412 days. Probate cases resolve fastest (avg 311 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (avg 466 days).
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 165 | 60 | +105 | 36.4% | |
| Feb 2020 | 156 | 58 | +98 | 37.2% | |
| Mar 2020 | 123 | 39 | +84 | 31.7% | |
| Apr 2020 | 68 | 35 | +33 | 51.5% | |
| May 2020 | 101 | 59 | +42 | 58.4% | |
| Jun 2020 | 123 | 49 | +74 | 39.8% | |
| Jul 2020 | 143 | 54 | +89 | 37.8% | |
| Aug 2020 | 144 | 28 | +116 | 19.4% | |
| Sep 2020 | 124 | 33 | +91 | 26.6% | |
| Oct 2020 | 113 | 42 | +71 | 37.2% | |
| Nov 2020 | 107 | 32 | +75 | 29.9% | |
| Dec 2020 | 116 | 30 | +86 | 25.9% | |
| Jan 2021 | 124 | 50 | +74 | 40.3% | |
| Feb 2021 | 114 | 40 | +74 | 35.1% | |
| Mar 2021 | 157 | 39 | +118 | 24.8% | |
| Apr 2021 | 139 | 55 | +84 | 39.6% | |
| May 2021 | 148 | 54 | +94 | 36.5% | |
| Jun 2021 | 132 | 40 | +92 | 30.3% | |
| Jul 2021 | 137 | 28 | +109 | 20.4% | |
| Aug 2021 | 131 | 42 | +89 | 32.1% | |
| Sep 2021 | 138 | 39 | +99 | 28.3% | |
| Oct 2021 | 121 | 47 | +74 | 38.8% | |
| Nov 2021 | 108 | 38 | +70 | 35.2% | |
| Dec 2021 | 96 | 29 | +67 | 30.2% | |
| Jan 2022 | 145 | 37 | +108 | 25.5% | |
| Feb 2022 | 134 | 48 | +86 | 35.8% | |
| Mar 2022 | 163 | 28 | +135 | 17.2% | |
| Apr 2022 | 148 | 41 | +107 | 27.7% | |
| May 2022 | 142 | 39 | +103 | 27.5% | |
| Jun 2022 | 156 | 40 | +116 | 25.6% | |
| Jul 2022 | 138 | 35 | +103 | 25.4% | |
| Aug 2022 | 151 | 61 | +90 | 40.4% | |
| Sep 2022 | 155 | 62 | +93 | 40.0% | |
| Oct 2022 | 146 | 0 | +146 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2022 | 154 | 0 | +154 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2022 | 118 | 0 | +118 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2023 | 121 | 0 | +121 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2023 | 134 | 0 | +134 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2023 | 151 | 0 | +151 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2023 | 116 | 0 | +116 | 0.0% | |
| May 2023 | 135 | 0 | +135 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2023 | 150 | 0 | +150 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2023 | 119 | 0 | +119 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2023 | 154 | 0 | +154 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2023 | 133 | 0 | +133 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2023 | 130 | 0 | +130 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2023 | 134 | 0 | +134 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2023 | 96 | 0 | +96 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2024 | 146 | 0 | +146 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2024 | 84 | 0 | +84 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2024 | 139 | 0 | +139 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2024 | 77 | 0 | +77 | 0.0% | |
| May 2024 | 122 | 0 | +122 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2024 | 80 | 21 | +59 | 26.2% | |
| Jul 2024 | 61 | 0 | +61 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2024 | 108 | 52 | +56 | 48.1% | |
| Sep 2024 | 72 | 13 | +59 | 18.1% | |
| Oct 2024 | 115 | 59 | +56 | 51.3% | |
| Nov 2024 | 53 | 0 | +53 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2024 | 73 | 53 | +20 | 72.6% | |
| Jan 2025 | 114 | 22 | +92 | 19.3% | |
| Feb 2025 | 82 | 19 | +63 | 23.2% | |
| Mar 2025 | 57 | 0 | +57 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2025 | 88 | 32 | +56 | 36.4% | |
| May 2025 | 98 | 32 | +66 | 32.7% | |
| Jun 2025 | 78 | 21 | +57 | 26.9% | |
| Jul 2025 | 82 | 69 | +13 | 84.1% | |
| Aug 2025 | 115 | 86 | +29 | 74.8% | |
| Sep 2025 | 108 | 49 | +59 | 45.4% | |
| Oct 2025 | 57 | 0 | +57 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2025 | 67 | 0 | +67 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2025 | 86 | 0 | +86 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2026 | 103 | 0 | +103 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2026 | 67 | 0 | +67 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2026 | 81 | 0 | +81 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2026 | 131 | 0 | +131 | 0.0% | |
| May 2026 | 146 | 2 | +144 | 1.4% | |
| Jun 2026 | 168 | 7 | +161 | 4.2% | |
| Jul 2026 | 143 | 4 | +139 | 2.8% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3481 | 1123 | 32.3% | 444 |
| Probate | 2237 | 232 | 10.4% | 311 |
| Guardianship | 1566 | 349 | 22.3% | 466 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1223 | 248 | 20.3% | 396 |
| Partition | 840 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 1952 resolved cases out of 9352 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
73.1% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (18.8%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 3,334 | 73.1% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 859 | 18.8% | |
| Agricultural | 224 | 4.9% | |
| Residential | 114 | 2.5% | |
| Commercial | 17 | 0.4% | |
| Condo/Townhouse | 15 | 0.3% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 73.6% | 1,747 |
| Probate | Single Family | 67.9% | 1,232 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 78.8% | 824 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 75.6% | 565 |
| Partition | Single Family | 69.6% | 191 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 4,563 properties (48.8% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
6,278 cases (67.1%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Probate cases resolve fastest (median 229 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (median 423 days). 129 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 129 | 2 | 127 | 1.6% |
| 30-90 days | 314 | 11 | 303 | 3.5% |
| 3-6 months | 288 | 0 | 288 | 0.0% |
| 6-12 months | 534 | 130 | 404 | 24.3% |
| 1-2 years | 1,019 | 377 | 642 | 37.0% |
| 2+ years | 7,068 | 1,432 | 5,636 | 20.3% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3,481 | 1123 | 32.3% | 394d |
| Probate | 2,237 | 232 | 10.4% | 229d |
| Guardianship | 1,566 | 349 | 22.3% | 423d |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1,223 | 248 | 20.3% | 309d |
| Partition | 840 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Municipality filing concentration in Madison County
Court filings in Madison County span 91 municipalities. Anderson leads with 1977 filings (58.0% of total), predominantly Divorce (40.0%). Filing activity is geographically concentrated — the top 3 municipalities account for 76% of all filings.
| Municipality | Filings | Share | Top case type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 1977 | 58.0% | Divorce (40.0%) |
| Pendleton | 334 | 9.8% | Divorce (52.1%) |
| Alexandria | 290 | 8.5% | Divorce (35.9%) |
| Elwood | 267 | 7.8% | Divorce (41.2%) |
| Chesterfield | 76 | 2.2% | Divorce (48.7%) |
| Lapel | 63 | 1.8% | Probate (42.9%) |
| Frankton | 59 | 1.7% | Divorce (40.7%) |
| Markleville | 57 | 1.7% | Divorce (45.6%) |
| Summitville | 54 | 1.6% | Divorce (40.7%) |
| Ingalls | 45 | 1.3% | Divorce (42.2%) |
| Fortville | 19 | 0.6% | Probate (36.8%) |
| Middletown | 16 | 0.5% | Divorce (56.2%) |
| Muncie | 15 | 0.4% | Divorce (40.0%) |
| Indianapolis | 15 | 0.4% | Divorce (46.7%) |
| Noblesville | 9 | 0.3% | Probate (44.4%) |
Top 15 of 91 municipalities with court filings. Data from 3,410 filings (36% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 18 comparable quarters show 6,181 tracked filings in Madison County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 445) was rising vs prior (2026 Q1: 251, +77.3%). Partition shows the largest composition shift, declining share from 9.6% to 5.1%.
| Quarter | Total | Divorce | Probate | Guardianship | Pre-Foreclosure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 442 | 147 (33.3%) | 141 (31.9%) | 50 (11.3%) | 76 (17.2%) |
| 2022 Q2 | 446 | 147 (33.0%) | 109 (24.4%) | 80 (17.9%) | 72 (16.1%) |
| 2022 Q3 | 444 | 160 (36.0%) | 97 (21.8%) | 95 (21.4%) | 57 (12.8%) |
| 2022 Q4 | 418 | 139 (33.3%) | 102 (24.4%) | 81 (19.4%) | 56 (13.4%) |
| 2023 Q1 | 406 | 144 (35.5%) | 95 (23.4%) | 80 (19.7%) | 49 (12.1%) |
| 2023 Q2 | 401 | 157 (39.2%) | 91 (22.7%) | 69 (17.2%) | 47 (11.7%) |
| 2023 Q3 | 406 | 148 (36.5%) | 81 (20.0%) | 75 (18.5%) | 51 (12.6%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 360 | 110 (30.6%) | 82 (22.8%) | 52 (14.4%) | 63 (17.5%) |
| 2024 Q1 | 369 | 131 (35.5%) | 71 (19.2%) | 69 (18.7%) | 64 (17.3%) |
| 2024 Q2 | 279 | 102 (36.6%) | 73 (26.2%) | 42 (15.1%) | 41 (14.7%) |
| 2024 Q3 | 241 | 98 (40.7%) | 53 (22.0%) | 46 (19.1%) | 43 (17.8%) |
| 2024 Q4 | 241 | 90 (37.3%) | 56 (23.2%) | 39 (16.2%) | 47 (19.5%) |
| 2025 Q1 | 253 | 96 (37.9%) | 59 (23.3%) | 49 (19.4%) | 48 (19.0%) |
| 2025 Q2 | 264 | 110 (41.7%) | 63 (23.9%) | 42 (15.9%) | 49 (18.6%) |
| 2025 Q3 | 305 | 129 (42.3%) | 61 (20.0%) | 58 (19.0%) | 48 (15.7%) |
| 2025 Q4 | 210 | 76 (36.2%) | 45 (21.4%) | 30 (14.3%) | 50 (23.8%) |
| 2026 Q1 | 251 | 86 (34.3%) | 62 (24.7%) | 24 (9.6%) | 58 (23.1%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 445 | 129 (29.0%) | 111 (24.9%) | 59 (13.3%) | 86 (19.3%) |
Composition shift: Partition filings are declining share, moving from 9.6% to 5.1% of total filings (-4.5 percentage points).
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $94,750, with the largest concentration (38.0%) in the $50K–$100K range. Probate filings have the highest median value ($103,500) while Partition filings are lowest ($71,200).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 386 | 15.3% | |
| $50K–$100K | 956 | 38.0% | |
| $100K–$150K | 625 | 24.8% | |
| $150K–$200K | 257 | 10.2% | |
| $200K–$300K | 175 | 6.9% | |
| $300K–$500K | 81 | 3.2% | |
| $500K+ | 38 | 1.5% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $89,700 | $149,790 | 795 |
| Probate | $103,500 | $119,473 | 718 |
| Guardianship | $87,900 | $158,631 | 509 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $98,200 | $117,196 | 453 |
| Partition | $71,200 | $106,309 | 43 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 2,518 properties (26.9% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 6.8 years, with 39.5% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Probate cases show the longest tenure (12.2 yr median) vs. Partition (4.8 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 357 | 16.3% | |
| 2–5 years | 510 | 23.3% | |
| 5–10 years | 457 | 20.9% | |
| 10–20 years | 866 | 39.5% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5.3 yr | 6.7 yr | 897 |
| Probate | 12.2 yr | 10.4 yr | 530 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 5.7 yr | 7.3 yr | 395 |
| Guardianship | 6.4 yr | 7.7 yr | 232 |
| Partition | 4.8 yr | 6.9 yr | 131 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 2,190 properties (23.4% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Madison County
Of 8,453 unique property owners in court filings, 581 (6.9%) appear in multiple cases, including 165 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 19 cases spanning 68 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 17.3%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 277 | 3163 | 8.8% |
| Probate | 178 | 2142 | 8.3% |
| Guardianship | 228 | 1321 | 17.3% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 58 | 1165 | 5.0% |
| Partition | 13 | 830 | 1.6% |
Analysis based on 8,453 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Serial distressed properties in Madison County
Of 3,951 unique properties in court filings, 337 (8.5%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.2 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 17 months. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 22.5%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 151 | 1552 | 9.7% |
| Probate | 96 | 1213 | 7.9% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 106 | 779 | 13.6% |
| Guardianship | 75 | 334 | 22.5% |
| Partition | 32 | 191 | 16.8% |
Analysis based on 3,951 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 4,769 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 14.1% (median land value $14,900, median improvement value $91,200). 55 properties (1.2%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Guardianship cases skew most land-heavy (median 14.8%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (13.7%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 774 | 16.2% |
| 10–20% | 3,276 | 68.7% |
| 20–30% | 522 | 10.9% |
| 30–50% | 142 | 3.0% |
| 50–70% | 29 | 0.6% |
| Over 70% | 26 | 0.5% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1,798 | 13.8% |
| Probate | 1,311 | 14.5% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 852 | 13.7% |
| Guardianship | 609 | 14.8% |
| Partition | 194 | 14.1% |
Analysis of 4,769 properties (51.0% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Prior sale value trajectory
Across 318 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -39.0%. 254 properties (79.9%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -38.9% value change vs -23.4% for long-hold (10+ yr). Probate cases have the highest underwater rate (88.2%) while Partition has the lowest (63.6%).
Value change distribution
| Value change bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 50%+ loss | 105 | 33.0% |
| 20–50% loss | 112 | 35.2% |
| 0–20% loss | 37 | 11.6% |
| 0–20% gain | 19 | 6.0% |
| 20–50% gain | 19 | 6.0% |
| 50–100% gain | 15 | 4.7% |
| 100%+ gain | 11 | 3.5% |
Holding period vs value change
(55 properties)
(20 properties)
Value trajectory by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median change | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | 110 | -42.5% | 88.2% |
| Divorce | 93 | -36.8% | 82.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 85 | -33.5% | 67.1% |
| Guardianship | 19 | -34.1% | 84.2% |
| Partition | 11 | -29.1% | 63.6% |
Analysis of 318 properties (3.4% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Madison County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (50% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-08-03 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Madison County
Where filings concentrate inside Madison County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 2258 | 61.8% |
| Pendleton | 365 | 10.0% |
| Alexandria | 293 | 8.0% |
| Elwood | 281 | 7.7% |
| Chesterfield | 85 | 2.3% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Madison County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Madison County filings
Subscribe to Madison County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Madison County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Madison County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-08-03, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/madison-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)