Madison County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Madison County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-14. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+310.0%) — last 2 complete months (123 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (30 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 19.1% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $14,472/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $75,700 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 45.0% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Madison County during the observed window.
About Madison County
Madison County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. The 2020 census states the population is standing at 130,129. The county seat since 1836 has been Anderson, one of three incorporated cities within the county. Madison County is included in the Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
231 verified property-related court filings tracked across 20 months (Jan 2024 to Jul 2026).
0% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (0 of 231 filings).
$75,700 median estimated property value across the 33 filings with property-enrichment data (14% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 104 | 45.0% | |
| Probate | 51 | 22.1% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42 | 18.2% | |
| Guardianship | 29 | 12.6% | |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 2.2% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Madison County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 11 | ||
| Feb 2024 | 3 | -8 | |
| Mar 2024 | 15 | +12 | |
| Apr 2024 | 2 | -13 | |
| May 2024 | 6 | +4 | |
| Jun 2024 | 1 | -5 | |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 0 | |
| Oct 2024 | 6 | +5 | |
| Dec 2024 | 2 | -4 | |
| Jan 2025 | 2 | 0 | |
| Aug 2025 | 7 | +5 | |
| Sep 2025 | 2 | -5 | |
| Dec 2025 | 4 | +2 | |
| Jan 2026 | 7 | +3 | |
| Feb 2026 | 3 | -4 | |
| Mar 2026 | 2 | -1 | |
| Apr 2026 | 28 | +26 | |
| May 2026 | 71 | +43 | |
| Jun 2026 | 52 | -19 | |
| Jul 2026 | 6 | -46 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 10 ZIPs in Madison County account for 10.4% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46011 | ANDERSON | 5 | 2.2% | |
| 46016 | Anderson | 5 | 2.2% | |
| 46064 | Pendleton | 4 | 1.7% | |
| 46001 | ALEXANDRIA | 2 | 0.9% | |
| 46036 | ELWOOD | 2 | 0.9% | |
| 46017 | Anderson | 2 | 0.9% | |
| 46056 | MARKLEVILLE | 1 | 0.4% | |
| 46013 | ANDERSON | 1 | 0.4% | |
| 46040 | FORTVILLE | 1 | 0.4% | |
| 46014 | ANDERSON | 1 | 0.4% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (11% of Madison County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 16 | 48.5% | |
| $75k - $150k | 13 | 39.4% | |
| $150k - $250k | 3 | 9.1% | |
| $250k - $400k | 1 | 3.0% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (14% coverage on Madison County filings). Median $75,700; mean $92,458.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Madison County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Mon | 18 | 7.8% | |
| Tue | 36 | 15.6% | |
| Wed | 47 | 20.3% | |
| Thu | 78 | 33.8% | |
| Fri | 45 | 19.5% | |
| Sat | 7 | 3.0% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 231 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 125 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median living area | 1,572 sqft |
| Median bedrooms | 3.0 |
| Median bathrooms | 1.0 |
| Median lot size | 1210.0 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 59075 Madison County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Madison County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 61.8% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 20.7% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 77.4% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 18.6% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Madison County sits within the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $898 |
| 1-bedroom | $919 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,206 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,594 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,597 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Madison County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 186 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | +0.0% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 100.0% |
| Single-family units permitted | 186 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 0 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Madison County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Madison County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| NEWREZ LLC | 3 |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC | 2 |
| U.S. BANK TRUST N.A | 2 |
| THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | 2 |
| ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC | 1 |
| WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB | 1 |
| U.S. BANK N.A. | 1 |
| NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A. | 1 |
| ASO EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC | 1 |
| PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Madison County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Madison County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 126 filings (54.5% of all 231 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Time from filing to sale
How quickly do distressed properties sell after a court filing is recorded? This distribution shows where post-filing sales cluster.
| Timeframe | Sales | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 30 days | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 31–90 days | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 91–180 days | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 181–365 days | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Over 1 year | 4 | 66.7% |
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Tracked | Sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Foreclosure | 33 | 2 | 6.1% |
| Divorce | 55 | 3 | 5.5% |
| Probate | 23 | 1 | 4.3% |
| Guardianship | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 100.0% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 6 | 100.0% |
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 126 of 231 filings (54.5% parcel coverage). Timing based on 6 sales with valid filing and sale dates. Prices based on 5 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Madison County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 126 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 123 | 97.6% |
| X-500yr | 2 | 1.6% |
| AE | 1 | 0.8% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 126 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 104 | 45.0% | +1400.0% |
| Probate | 51 | 22.1% | +400.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42 | 18.2% | -- |
| Guardianship | 29 | 12.6% | +80.0% |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 2.2% | -- |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| NEWREZ LLC | 4 | 12.9% |
| THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | 3 | 9.7% |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC | 2 | 6.5% |
| US BANK TRUST NA | 2 | 6.5% |
| GRANT COUNTY STATE BANK | 2 | 6.5% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 31 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in May and are lowest in Sep. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 6.7 | 17% |
| Feb | 3 | 8% |
| Mar | 8.5 | 22% |
| Apr | 15 | 39% |
| May | 38.5 | 100% |
| Jun | 26.5 | 69% |
| Aug | 4 | 10% |
| Sep | 2 | 5% |
| Oct | 6 | 16% |
| Dec | 3 | 8% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (May).
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 12 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46011 | Anderson | 5 | 2.2% | $96,050 |
| 46016 | Anderson | 5 | 2.2% | $52,400 |
| 46064 | Pendleton | 4 | 1.7% | $183,500 |
| 46001 | Alexandria | 2 | 0.9% | $40,800 |
| 46036 | Elwood | 2 | 0.9% | $71,200 |
| 46017 | Anderson | 2 | 0.9% | $119,300 |
| 46056 | Markleville | 1 | 0.4% | $228,000 |
| 46013 | Anderson | 1 | 0.4% | -- |
| 46040 | Fortville | 1 | 0.4% | $203,700 |
| 46014 | Anderson | 1 | 0.4% | $83,100 |
Top 10 of 12 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (100%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 104 | 0.0% |
| Probate | 51 | 0.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42 | 0.0% |
| Guardianship | 29 | 0.0% |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Divorce, Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. Probate, Guardianship share is declining.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 51.2% | 39.2% | +12.0pp (rising) |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 20.3% | 14.7% | +5.6pp (rising) |
| Probate | 17.9% | 28.4% | -10.5pp (falling) |
| Guardianship | 6.5% | 17.6% | -11.1pp (falling) |
| Inherited Property | 4.1% | 0.0% | +4.1pp |
Distress diversity score: 1.85 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $71,500. Pre-Foreclosure filings involve the highest-value properties (median $94,000), while Divorce filings trend lower (median $71,200). The largest segment (71.4%) falls in the Under $100K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 25 | 71.4% |
| $100K - $250K | 9 | 25.7% |
| $250K - $500K | 1 | 2.9% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $71,200 | $94,500 | 18 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $94,000 | $86,279 | 14 |
Based on county assessor records for 35 properties with court filings (15.2% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 3 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46011 (Anderson) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (5 cases).
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 46011 | Anderson |
75
|
5 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 46016 | Anderson |
75
|
5 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 46064 | Pendleton |
25
|
4 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 231 court filings across 3 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$3,104,200 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 35 court-filed properties. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($1,701,000 across 18 properties).
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $1,701,000 | 18 | $94,500 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $1,207,900 | 14 | $86,279 | -- |
| Probate | $195,300 | 3 | $65,100 | -- |
Based on 35 properties with assessor valuations (15.2% of 231 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
231 court filings tracked with 0 resolved (0.0% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 231 active cases.
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2024 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2024 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2024 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0.0% | |
| May 2024 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2024 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2024 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2024 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2025 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2025 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2025 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2025 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2026 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2026 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2026 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2026 | 28 | 0 | +28 | 0.0% | |
| May 2026 | 71 | 0 | +71 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2026 | 52 | 0 | +52 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2026 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 104 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Probate | 51 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Guardianship | 29 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Inherited Property | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 0 resolved cases out of 231 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
70.1% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (20.5%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 82 | 70.1% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 24 | 20.5% | |
| Agricultural | 8 | 6.8% | |
| Condo/Townhouse | 1 | 0.9% | |
| Residential | 1 | 0.9% | |
| Commercial | 1 | 0.9% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 77.1% | 48 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 69.7% | 33 |
| Probate | Single Family | 59.1% | 22 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 60.0% | 10 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 117 properties (50.6% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
49 cases (21.2%) have been active for over a year without resolution. 19 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 135 | 0 | 135 | 0.0% |
| 3-6 months | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% |
| 6-12 months | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% |
| 1-2 years | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% |
| 2+ years | 38 | 0 | 38 | 0.0% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 104 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Probate | 51 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Guardianship | 29 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $71,200, with the largest concentration (43.2%) in the $50K–$100K range. Pre-Foreclosure filings have the highest median value ($84,300) while Divorce filings are lowest ($71,200).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 11 | 29.7% | |
| $50K–$100K | 16 | 43.2% | |
| $100K–$150K | 6 | 16.2% | |
| $150K–$200K | 1 | 2.7% | |
| $200K–$300K | 3 | 8.1% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $71,200 | $94,500 | 18 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $84,300 | $80,546 | 15 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 37 properties (16.0% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 3.1 years. Divorce cases show the longest tenure (3.7 yr median) vs. Pre-Foreclosure (3.2 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 7 | 22.6% | |
| 2–5 years | 19 | 61.3% | |
| 5–10 years | 5 | 16.1% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 3.7 yr | 3.6 yr | 15 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 3.2 yr | 3.3 yr | 13 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 31 properties (13.4% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Madison County
Of 227 unique property owners in court filings, 3 (1.3%) appear in multiple cases. The most active repeat filer has 2 cases spanning 19 months.
Analysis based on 227 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 35 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 11.4% (median land value $10,800, median improvement value $84,100). 1 properties (2.9%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Divorce cases skew most land-heavy (median 13.2%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (10.1%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 11 | 31.4% |
| 10–20% | 22 | 62.9% |
| 20–30% | 1 | 2.9% |
| 50–70% | 1 | 2.9% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 17 | 13.2% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 15 | 10.1% |
Analysis of 35 properties (15.2% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Madison County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (14% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-14 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Madison County
Where filings concentrate inside Madison County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 15 | 57.7% |
| Pendleton | 4 | 15.4% |
| Alexandria | 2 | 7.7% |
| Elwood | 2 | 7.7% |
| Markleville | 1 | 3.8% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Madison County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Madison County filings
Subscribe to Madison County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Madison County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Madison County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-14, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/madison-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)