HomeReports › Lake County, Indiana

Lake County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence

Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Lake County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-18. See methodology.

Data current as of 2026-07-18 · refreshes nightly #1 of 23 Indiana counties we cover by filing volume
Investor takeaway

About Lake County

Lake County is a county located in the U.S. state of Indiana. In 2020, its population was 498,700, making it Indiana's second-most populous county. The county seat is Crown Point. The county is part of Northwest Indiana and the Chicago metropolitan area, and contains a mix of urban, suburban and rural areas. It is bordered on the north by Lake Michigan and contains a portion of the Indiana Dunes. It includes Marktown, Clayton Mark's planned worker community in East Chicago.

Source: Wikipedia

Get Lake County leads delivered daily

Owner names, phone numbers, and property details — the day each case is filed. 7-day free trial.

See Lake County Leads →

At a glance

27303 verified property-related court filings tracked across 76 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).

362 typical monthly filing volume.

#1 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.

3% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (764 of 27303 filings).

$203,900 median estimated property value across the 5277 filings with property-enrichment data (19% coverage).

3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.

Filing type breakdown

Filing typeFilingsShare
Divorce 9652 35.4%
Probate 6348 23.3%
Partition 4723 17.3%
Pre-Foreclosure 4253 15.6%
Guardianship 2318 8.5%
Inherited Property 9 0.0%

Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.

Get the full Lake County lead list

Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.

Start Free Trial

Monthly filing activity

MonthFilingsvs prior
Jan 2020 439
Feb 2020 427 -12
Mar 2020 362 -65
Apr 2020 202 -160
May 2020 252 +50
Jun 2020 406 +154
Jul 2020 380 -26
Aug 2020 360 -20
Sep 2020 416 +56
Oct 2020 383 -33
Nov 2020 294 -89
Dec 2020 306 +12
Jan 2021 335 +29
Feb 2021 317 -18
Mar 2021 456 +139
Apr 2021 430 -26
May 2021 347 -83
Jun 2021 380 +33
Jul 2021 333 -47
Aug 2021 376 +43
Sep 2021 360 -16
Oct 2021 379 +19
Nov 2021 331 -48
Dec 2021 297 -34
Jan 2022 439 +142
Feb 2022 376 -63
Mar 2022 510 +134
Apr 2022 403 -107
May 2022 423 +20
Jun 2022 409 -14
Jul 2022 324 -85
Aug 2022 446 +122
Sep 2022 369 -77
Oct 2022 371 +2
Nov 2022 332 -39
Dec 2022 299 -33
Jan 2023 411 +112
Feb 2023 418 +7
Mar 2023 443 +25
Apr 2023 350 -93
May 2023 373 +23
Jun 2023 333 -40
Jul 2023 374 +41
Aug 2023 441 +67
Sep 2023 398 -43
Oct 2023 407 +9
Nov 2023 373 -34
Dec 2023 369 -4
Jan 2024 225 -144
Feb 2024 407 +182
Mar 2024 413 +6
Apr 2024 363 -50
May 2024 382 +19
Jun 2024 352 -30
Jul 2024 361 +9
Aug 2024 368 +7
Sep 2024 330 -38
Oct 2024 361 +31
Nov 2024 332 -29
Dec 2024 366 +34
Jan 2025 383 +17
Feb 2025 304 -79
Mar 2025 20 -284
Apr 2025 289 +269
May 2025 187 -102
Jul 2025 395 +208
Sep 2025 261 -134
Oct 2025 357 +96
Dec 2025 189 -168
Jan 2026 368 +179
Feb 2026 465 +97
Mar 2026 485 +20
Apr 2026 413 -72
May 2026 441 +28
Jun 2026 380 -61
Jul 2026 147 -233

Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.

Geographic concentration by ZIP

Top 10 ZIPs in Lake County account for 10.5% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.

ZIPCityFilingsShare
46307 CROWN POINT 585 2.1%
46342 HOBART 361 1.3%
46410 MERRILLVILLE 303 1.1%
46375 SCHERERVILLE 272 1.0%
46322 HIGHLAND 257 0.9%
46356 LOWELL 250 0.9%
46321 MUNSTER 219 0.8%
46303 CEDAR LAKE 219 0.8%
46324 HAMMOND 208 0.8%
46373 SAINT JOHN 193 0.7%

Based on filings with a parseable property address (17% of Lake County filings).

Target these ZIP codes before your competitors

Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.

See Availability

Property value distribution

Estimated valueFilingsShare
Under $75k 465 8.8%
$75k - $150k 1170 22.2%
$150k - $250k 1742 33.0%
$250k - $400k 1339 25.4%
$400k+ 561 10.6%

Source: third-party property enrichment (19% coverage on Lake County filings). Median $203,900; mean $230,667.

These properties are in your market right now

Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Lake County. One subscriber per county.

Check Availability

Day-of-week filing pattern

DayFilingsShare
Sun 280 1.0%
Mon 5377 19.7%
Tue 5675 20.8%
Wed 5292 19.4%
Thu 5469 20.0%
Fri 4988 18.3%
Sat 222 0.8%

Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 27303 filings with a parseable date.

Case lifecycle (foreclosure)

Median time between key court-process milestones, computed from docket-entry timestamps on the 243 cases with documented filing-event data:

MilestoneMedian daysSample size
Complaint filed → summons served10 days115 cases
Complaint filed → judgment72 days18 cases

Source: court docket entries. Only foreclosure cases under active monitoring are tracked through milestones. Cases without a documented filing or service event are excluded from this calculation.

Building characteristics

Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 5331 filings with characteristic data:

IndicatorValue
Median year built1963
Median living area1,370 sqft
Median lot size0.24 acres
Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment)0.0%

Housing stock + distress signals

Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 216330 Lake County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.

Indicator Lake County US average
Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale)10.6%10.5%
Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage63.7%60.8%
Pre-1940 housing stock14.8%12.3%
Single-family detached share of housing stock71.5%61.2%
Residents age 65 or older17.4%17.3%

Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.

Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)

HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Lake County sits within the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.

Unit size Fair market rent / month
Efficiency / studio$959
1-bedroom$1,082
2-bedroom$1,317
3-bedroom$1,612
4-bedroom$1,744

Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.

New construction (market momentum)

Annual building permits filed in Lake County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.

Indicator Value
Total housing units permitted (2025)1,262
Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025)-23.5%
Single-family share of permits (2025)100.0%
Single-family units permitted1,262
Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building)0

Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.

Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency

Lake County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.

IndicatorValuePeriod
Indiana home price index (year-over-year)+4.3%2026-01-01
Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020)+64.9%2026-01-01
National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family)1.89%2026-01-01

Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.

Local-market benchmark

Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:

IndicatorFiling-weighted average
Median household income (where filings cluster)$86,233
Median home value$254,716
Owner-occupancy rate80.8%
Renter share of households19.2%
Median gross rent$1,223/mo

Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 10 top ZIPs.

Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Lake County

Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").

PlaintiffForeclosure filings
U.S. BANK TRUST N.A 7
U.S. BANK N.A 5
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 5
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC 3
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB 3
ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC 3
CITIBANK, N.A 3
FIFTH THIRD BANK N.A 2
MIDFIRST BANK 2

Source: plaintiff names extracted from Lake County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.

Post-filing sale outcomes in Lake County

What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 5606 filings (20.5% of all 27303 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.

11.2%
of all filings had a confirmed post-filing sale (floor)
341
median days from filing to sale
$231,000
median post-filing sale price
1.42x
sale price vs. assessed value

Time from filing to sale

How quickly do distressed properties sell after a court filing is recorded? This distribution shows where post-filing sales cluster.

Timeframe Sales Share
Under 30 days 112 4.0%
31–90 days 321 11.6%
91–180 days 431 15.6%
181–365 days 585 21.1%
Over 1 year 1318 47.6%

Sale rates by filing type

Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.

Filing type Filings Confirmed sold Sale rate
Divorce 9652 1595 16.5%
Probate 6348 635 10.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 4253 373 8.8%
Partition 4723 353 7.5%
Guardianship 2318 108 4.7%

How sales relate to the filing

Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 55.4% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.

Attribution Meaning Sales Share
Filing-driven Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) 1698 55.4%
Deferred Sale happened well after the filing (over 1 year) — weaker filing connection 774 25.3%
Concurrent Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal 321 10.5%
Pre-existing Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded 271 8.8%

Who bought the property

Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.

Buyer Sales Share
Owner-occupant 2421 80.9%
Investor 505 16.9%
Government agency 44 1.5%
Family / non-arm's-length 16 0.5%
Bank / auction 7 0.2%

Based on 2993 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.

Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 5606 of 27303 filings (20.5% parcel coverage). Timing based on 2767 sales with valid filing and sale dates. Prices based on 120 sales with recorded sale amounts.

Be the first investor to reach these owners

Lake County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.

Start Free Trial

FEMA flood zone exposure

Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 1054 properties with geocoded locations.

1.3%
in Special Flood Hazard Area
14
properties in high-risk zones
Zone Properties Share
X 996 94.5%
X-levee 25 2.4%
X-500yr 18 1.7%
AE 11 1.0%
AH 2 0.2%
A 1 0.1%

Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 1054 properties checked.

Filing velocity by case type

How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.

Case type Total Share Trend
Divorce 9652 35.4% -12.3%
Probate 6348 23.3% +0.4%
Partition 4723 17.3% -2.6%
Pre-Foreclosure 4253 15.6% -6.6%
Guardianship 2318 8.5% -13.0%
Inherited Property 9 0.0% --

Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.

Lender concentration analysis

Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.

457
HHI score
Competitive
Market type
27.6%
Top 3 share
Lender / Plaintiff Filings Share
US BANK TRUST NA 8 10.5%
US BANK NA 7 9.2%
ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC 6 7.9%
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 5 6.6%
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC 4 5.3%

HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 76 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.

Seasonal filing patterns

Court filings peak in Aug and are lowest in Dec. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.

Month Avg filings Relative
Jan 371.4
93%
Feb 387.7
97%
Mar 384.1
96%
Apr 350
88%
May 343.6
86%
Jun 376.7
95%
Jul 361.2
91%
Aug 398.2
100%
Sep 355.7
89%
Oct 376.3
95%
Nov 332.4
83%
Dec 304.3
76%

Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Aug), with a 1.3x peak-to-trough ratio.

ZIP code distress hotspots

Distress is geographically dispersed across 31 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.

ZIP Area Filings Share Median value
46307 Crown Point 585 2.1% $293,636
46342 Hobart 361 1.3% $194,650
46410 Merrillville 303 1.1% $196,400
46375 Schererville 272 1.0% $298,400
46322 Highland 257 0.9% $237,500
46356 Lowell 250 0.9% $257,000
46321 Munster 219 0.8% $306,900
46303 Cedar Lake 219 0.8% $258,154
46324 Hammond 208 0.8% $155,700
46373 Saint John 193 0.7% $395,900

Top 10 of 31 ZIP codes with filings.

Non-resident owner analysis

Most filings (97%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.

2.8%
Non-resident owners
Case type Total filings Non-resident %
Divorce 9652 4.1%
Probate 6348 3.5%
Partition 4723 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 4253 2.5%
Guardianship 2318 1.8%
Inherited Property 9 0.0%

Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.

Target absentee and distressed owners directly

Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.

Claim Lake County

Distress composition and shifts

Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. Divorce share is declining. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.

Case type Recent share Earlier share Shift
Divorce 30.2% 35.5% -5.3pp (falling)
Pre-Foreclosure 23.0% 15.3% +7.7pp (rising)
Probate 21.4% 23.3% -1.9pp
Partition 14.4% 17.4% -3.0pp
Guardianship 9.9% 8.4% +1.5pp
Inherited Property 1.1% 0.0% +1.1pp

Distress diversity score: 2.29 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.

Motivation breakdown

Of 283 filings with a tagged motivation, the most common is Equity Division Sale (44.9%), followed by High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure (39.9%). This motivation breakdown is captured at the court-filing stage and is not available from property-data aggregators.

Motivation / sub-type Filings Share
Equity Division Sale 127 44.9%
High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure 113 39.9%
Inherited Property 43 15.2%

Based on 283 filings tagged with a motivation sub-type at the court-filing stage.

Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline

0.2% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 62 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is judgment entered (20 cases, 38% of resolved).

20
Judgment entered
0.1% of 27279 tracked
3
Default judgment
0.0% of 27279 tracked
12
Dismissed
0.0% of 27279 tracked
15
Settled / agreed resolution
0.1% of 27279 tracked
3
Sheriff sale
0.0% of 27279 tracked
62
Median days to resolution
23–77
25th–75th percentile (days)
53
Cases resolved
Resolution Type Median Days Cases
Judgment 69 20
Dismissal 38 12
Settlement 39 15
Sheriff sale 92 3
Detailed disposition breakdown
Disposition Count % of Resolved
Final Judgment 12 22.6%
Court Dismissed 10 18.9%
Agreed Order 8 15.1%
Dissolution Decree 6 11.3%
Settlement 6 11.3%
Sheriff Sale 3 5.7%
Default Judgment 3 5.7%
Dismissed Without Prejudice 2 3.8%

Outcomes by Case Type

Case Type Cases Resolved Resolution Rate Median Days
Divorce 9644 31 0.3% 65
Probate 6344 1 0.0%
Partition 4723 0 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 4241 21 0.5% 40
Guardianship 2318 0 0.0%
Inherited Property 9 0 0.0%

Based on 27279 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 27226 cases are still active or pending resolution.

Court Docket Activity

Across 444 tracked cases, the average case has 20 docket entries (median 17). 63.1% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Divorce cases are the most court-active at 22.2 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.

19.8
Avg. docket entries per case
17
Median entries per case
73
Most active case
Activity level Cases Share
Early stage (1-5 events) 10 2.3%
Mid-process (6-15 events) 154 34.7%
Advanced (16+ events) 280 63.1%
Docket activity by case type
Case type Avg. events Cases tracked
Divorce 22.2 203
Pre-Foreclosure 19.5 140
Probate 15.1 101

Based on 444 cases with docket event tracking from Lake County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.

Procedural Stage Pipeline

Of 294 tracked cases, 21.4% reached the service-of-process stage, 58.2% progressed to a hearing.

Case progression funnel
All tracked cases
294
Defendant served
63 (21.4%)
Response filed
76 (25.9%)
Hearing scheduled
171 (58.2%)
Terminal outcome Cases Share
Dismissed 20 6.8%
Settled 10 3.4%
Judgment entered 6 2.0%
Default judgment 3 1.0%
Sheriff sale 2 0.7%
Execution / enforcement 2 0.7%
Progression by case type
Case type Cases Served Hearing Resolved
Divorce 142 5.6% 85.2% 12.7%
Pre-Foreclosure 112 49.1% 20.5% 19.6%
Probate 40 0.0% 67.5% 0.0%

Based on 294 cases with 359 recorded stage transitions from Lake County court docket entries. Stages identified from docket events: service of process, responses, hearings, judgments, settlements, and dismissals.

Property Value Profile

The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $199,000. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $218,129), while Partition filings trend lower (median $159,900). The largest segment (47.0%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.

$199,000
Median assessed value
$226,774
Average assessed value
5467
Properties with values
Value range Properties Share
Under $100K 994 18.2%
$100K - $250K 2571 47.0%
$250K - $500K 1671 30.6%
$500K - $1M 217 4.0%
Over $1M 14 0.3%
Value breakdown by case type
Case type Median value Avg value Properties
Divorce $218,129 $243,063 2844
Probate $182,500 $201,575 1210
Pre-Foreclosure $186,000 $204,625 772
Partition $159,900 $199,269 372
Guardianship $166,100 $272,824 260
Inherited Property $176,500 $173,833 9

Based on county assessor records for 5467 properties with court filings (20.0% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.

Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code

Across 28 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46307 (Crown Point) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (585 cases). 13 of 28 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 48.

75/100
Highest ZIP score
28
ZIPs scored
48
Average score
Rank ZIP Code Area Score Filings Avg Value Absentee %
#1 46307 Crown Point
75
585 0%
#2 46342 Hobart
62
361 0%
#3 46410 Merrillville
58
303 0%
#4 46375 Schererville
56
272 0%
#5 46322 Highland
55
257 0%
#6 46356 Lowell
55
250 0%
#7 46321 Munster
53
219 0%
#8 46303 Cedar Lake
53
219 0%
#9 46324 Hammond
52
208 0%
#10 46311 Dyer
51
190 0%
How the score is calculated

The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:

  • Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
  • Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
  • Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
  • Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set

Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.

Based on 27303 court filings across 28 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.

Distress Capital Analysis

$1,239,773,495 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 5467 court-filed properties. 74% of properties with equity data carry 20%+ equity, signaling owners with real financial stakes in resolution. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($691,270,114 across 2844 properties).

$1,240M
Total Value at Risk
5467
Properties Valued
$199,000
Median Value

Equity Position of Distressed Properties

High (20%+)
83 (73.5%)
Moderate (1-20%)
22 (19.5%)
Low/Underwater (≤0%)
8 (7.1%)

Median equity position: 39.0% · Based on 113 properties with equity data

Capital at Risk by Filing Type

Filing Type Total Value Properties Avg Value High Equity %
Divorce
$691,270,114
2844 $243,063 80.4%
Probate
$243,906,132
1210 $201,575 90.0%
Pre-Foreclosure
$157,970,549
772 $204,625 64.9%
Partition
$74,127,900
372 $199,269 --
Guardianship
$70,934,300
260 $272,824 --
Inherited Property
$1,564,500
9 $173,833 --
High-Equity Distressed Properties
83 properties with 20%+ equity totaling $26,894,150 in assessed value (1.5% of all valued filings). Average property value: $324,026. These represent the highest-value investor targets — owners with real money at stake who are most likely to negotiate.

Based on 5467 properties with assessor valuations (20.0% of 27303 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.

Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis

27,372 court filings tracked with 53 resolved (0.2% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 27,319 active cases. Resolved cases take an average of 56 days. Divorce cases resolve fastest (avg 55 days), while Probate cases take longest (avg 97 days).

0.2%
Absorption Rate
27,319
Active Case Backlog
56
Avg Days to Resolve
Month New Filings Resolved Net Inflow Absorption
Jan 2020 439 0 +439
0.0%
Feb 2020 427 0 +427
0.0%
Mar 2020 362 0 +362
0.0%
Apr 2020 202 0 +202
0.0%
May 2020 252 0 +252
0.0%
Jun 2020 406 0 +406
0.0%
Jul 2020 380 0 +380
0.0%
Aug 2020 360 0 +360
0.0%
Sep 2020 416 0 +416
0.0%
Oct 2020 383 0 +383
0.0%
Nov 2020 294 0 +294
0.0%
Dec 2020 306 0 +306
0.0%
Jan 2021 335 0 +335
0.0%
Feb 2021 317 0 +317
0.0%
Mar 2021 456 0 +456
0.0%
Apr 2021 430 0 +430
0.0%
May 2021 347 0 +347
0.0%
Jun 2021 380 0 +380
0.0%
Jul 2021 333 0 +333
0.0%
Aug 2021 376 0 +376
0.0%
Sep 2021 360 0 +360
0.0%
Oct 2021 379 0 +379
0.0%
Nov 2021 331 0 +331
0.0%
Dec 2021 297 0 +297
0.0%
Jan 2022 439 0 +439
0.0%
Feb 2022 376 0 +376
0.0%
Mar 2022 510 0 +510
0.0%
Apr 2022 403 0 +403
0.0%
May 2022 423 0 +423
0.0%
Jun 2022 409 0 +409
0.0%
Jul 2022 324 0 +324
0.0%
Aug 2022 446 0 +446
0.0%
Sep 2022 369 0 +369
0.0%
Oct 2022 371 0 +371
0.0%
Nov 2022 332 0 +332
0.0%
Dec 2022 299 0 +299
0.0%
Jan 2023 411 0 +411
0.0%
Feb 2023 418 0 +418
0.0%
Mar 2023 443 0 +443
0.0%
Apr 2023 350 0 +350
0.0%
May 2023 373 0 +373
0.0%
Jun 2023 333 0 +333
0.0%
Jul 2023 374 0 +374
0.0%
Aug 2023 441 0 +441
0.0%
Sep 2023 398 0 +398
0.0%
Oct 2023 407 0 +407
0.0%
Nov 2023 373 0 +373
0.0%
Dec 2023 369 0 +369
0.0%
Jan 2024 225 0 +225
0.0%
Feb 2024 407 0 +407
0.0%
Mar 2024 413 0 +413
0.0%
Apr 2024 363 0 +363
0.0%
May 2024 382 0 +382
0.0%
Jun 2024 352 0 +352
0.0%
Jul 2024 361 0 +361
0.0%
Aug 2024 368 0 +368
0.0%
Sep 2024 330 0 +330
0.0%
Oct 2024 361 0 +361
0.0%
Nov 2024 332 0 +332
0.0%
Dec 2024 366 0 +366
0.0%
Jan 2025 383 0 +383
0.0%
Feb 2025 304 0 +304
0.0%
Mar 2025 20 0 +20
0.0%
Apr 2025 289 0 +289
0.0%
May 2025 187 0 +187
0.0%
Jul 2025 395 0 +395
0.0%
Sep 2025 261 0 +261
0.0%
Oct 2025 357 0 +357
0.0%
Dec 2025 189 0 +189
0.0%
Jan 2026 437 0 +437
0.0%
Feb 2026 465 11 +454
2.4%
Mar 2026 485 20 +465
4.1%
Apr 2026 413 14 +399
3.4%
May 2026 441 8 +433
1.8%
Jun 2026 380 0 +380
0.0%
Jul 2026 147 0 +147
0.0%

Resolution by Case Type

Case Type Filed Resolved Absorption Avg Days
Divorce 9678 31 0.3% 55
Probate 6359 1 0.0% 97
Partition 4723 0 0.0% n/a
Pre-Foreclosure 4277 21 0.5% 57
Guardianship 2326 0 0.0% n/a
Inherited Property 9 0 0.0% n/a
Resolution Speed Comparison
Divorce cases resolve fastest at an average of 55 days, while Probate cases take the longest at 97 days. This gap reflects the different legal processes and court scheduling for each case type.

Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 53 resolved cases out of 27372 total filings.

Equity-Outcome Correlation

1754 properties with assessed values analyzed across equity levels. High-equity properties (20%+) represent 3.5% of filings with a 6.6% resolution rate. Moderate (1-20%) properties resolve fastest (avg 15 days) vs Unknown Equity (avg 60 days).

1754
Properties Analyzed
53
With Outcomes
15
Fastest Avg Days
Equity Level Properties Share Resolved Resolution Rate Avg Days
High (20%+)
61
3.5% 4 6.6% 16
Moderate (1-20%)
16
0.9% 1 6.2% 15
Underwater (≤0%)
4
0.2% 0 0.0%
Unknown Equity
1673
95.4% 48 2.9% 60

Equity Profile by Case Type

Case Type Properties High Equity % Resolution Rate Avg Days
Divorce 784 3.3% 4.0% 55
Probate 453 1.3% 0.2% 97
Pre-Foreclosure 393 7.4% 5.3% 57
Guardianship 99 0.0% 0.0%
Partition 16 0.0% 0.0%
Inherited Property 9 0.0% 0.0%
High-equity properties resolve more often
Properties with 20%+ equity have a 6.6% resolution rate vs 0.0% for underwater properties.

Equity positions derived from county assessor data (assessed values minus outstanding liens where available). Resolution outcomes classified from court docket entries. Only properties with non-zero assessed values are included in this analysis.

Property Type Distribution

89.0% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (5.6%).

Single Family
Most common (89.0%)
5,363
Properties classified
7
Property categories
Property type Count Share Distribution
Single Family 4,774 89.0%
Duplex/Multi-Family 300 5.6%
Residential 169 3.2%
Agricultural 35 0.7%
Commercial 35 0.7%
Condo/Townhouse 26 0.5%
Industrial 24 0.4%
Property type by case type
Case type Dominant property type Share Properties
Divorce Single Family 91.2% 2,810
Probate Single Family 85.6% 1,173
Pre-Foreclosure Single Family 89.5% 769
Partition Single Family 84.7% 347
Guardianship Single Family 85.2% 256
Inherited Property Single Family 100.0% 8

Property classifications from county assessor records for 5,363 properties (19.6% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.

Case Aging & Stall Analysis

23,632 cases (86.3%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Pre-Foreclosure cases resolve fastest (median 40 days), while Divorce cases take longest (median 65 days). 272 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.

23,632
Cases stalled 1yr+
86.3%
of all filings
27,372
Total tracked
Age Total Resolved Still active Resolution rate
<30 days 272 0 272 0.0%
30-90 days 860 15 845 1.7%
3-6 months 1,357 38 1,319 2.8%
6-12 months 1,251 0 1,251 0.0%
1-2 years 3,322 0 3,322 0.0%
2+ years 20,310 0 20,310 0.0%
Resolution speed by case type
Case type Total Resolved Rate Median days
Divorce 9,678 31 0.3% 65d
Probate 6,359 1 0.0%
Partition 4,723 0 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 4,277 21 0.5% 40d
Guardianship 2,326 0 0.0%

Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.

Property Age & Distress Profile

1,444 filings (5.3% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (43%). Newer properties (2000+) average $418,005 — 2.4x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($175,106). 1960–1979 cases resolve fastest (median 39d) vs 1980–1999 (75d).

1,444
Properties with year built
5.3%
Coverage
Pre-1960
Most common era (42.9%)
Construction era Filings Share Avg value Median days
Pre-1960 620 42.9% $175,106 68d
1960–1979 352 24.4% $223,181 39d
1980–1999 215 14.9% $279,065 75d
2000+ 257 17.8% $418,005 44d

Value trend: 2000+ properties average $418,005 — 2.39x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($175,106).

Top case types by construction era
Pre-1960: Divorce (41.9%), Pre-Foreclosure (27.1%), Probate (26.0%), Guardianship (4.8%)
1960–1979: Divorce (39.5%), Pre-Foreclosure (29.5%), Probate (25.0%), Guardianship (5.1%)
1980–1999: Divorce (42.3%), Probate (29.3%), Pre-Foreclosure (23.3%), Guardianship (4.2%)
2000+: Divorce (45.5%), Probate (24.9%), Pre-Foreclosure (22.6%), Guardianship (5.8%)

Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.

Municipality filing concentration in Lake County

Court filings in Lake County span 25 municipalities. Hammond leads with 273 filings (21.8% of total), predominantly Divorce (48.0%). Filings show moderate geographic spread — the top 3 municipalities account for 45% of filings.

25
Municipalities
44.9%
Top 3 share
Moderate
Geographic spread
Municipality Filings Share Top case type
Hammond 273 21.8% Divorce (48.0%)
Gary 183 14.6% Divorce (47.0%)
Crown Point 106 8.5% Divorce (47.2%)
Hobart 86 6.9% Divorce (36.0%)
Merrillville 79 6.3% Divorce (55.7%)
Highland 59 4.7% Divorce (37.3%)
Schererville 56 4.5% Probate (37.5%)
Dyer 52 4.2% Probate (36.5%)
East Chicago 52 4.2% Divorce (55.8%)
Lowell 52 4.2% Pre-Foreclosure (38.5%)
Munster 51 4.1% Divorce (51.0%)
Saint John 45 3.6% Divorce (68.9%)
Griffith 45 3.6% Divorce (44.4%)
Lake Station 35 2.8% Pre-Foreclosure (45.7%)
Cedar Lake 30 2.4% Divorce (56.7%)

Top 15 of 25 municipalities with court filings. Data from 1,253 filings (5% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.

Property Value Distribution

The median property value in distressed filings is $189,100, with the largest concentration (25.1%) in the $200K–$300K range. Divorce filings have the highest median value ($193,950) while Partition filings are lowest ($118,200).

$189,100
Median value
$281,677
Average value
1,754
Properties valued
Price range Count Share Distribution
Under $50K 171 9.7%
$50K–$100K 173 9.9%
$100K–$150K 291 16.6%
$150K–$200K 306 17.4%
$200K–$300K 440 25.1%
$300K–$500K 291 16.6%
$500K+ 82 4.7%
Value by case type
Case type Median value Average value Properties
Divorce $193,950 $334,917 784
Probate $190,500 $231,389 453
Pre-Foreclosure $184,800 $204,012 393
Guardianship $171,200 $426,445 99
Partition $118,200 $130,781 16

Assessed property values from county assessor records for 1,754 properties (6.4% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.

Ownership Duration Before Filing

The median ownership duration before a court filing is 7.4 years, with 40.0% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Probate cases show the longest tenure (13.5 yr median) vs. Partition (4.3 yr).

7.4 yr
Median tenure
11.4 yr
Average tenure
3,195
Properties tracked
Ownership period Count Share Distribution
Under 2 years 467 14.6%
2–5 years 743 23.3%
5–10 years 706 22.1%
10–20 years 642 20.1%
20+ years 637 19.9%
Tenure by case type
Case type Median tenure Average tenure Properties
Divorce 6.2 yr 9.4 yr 1,610
Probate 13.5 yr 16.4 yr 647
Pre-Foreclosure 7.5 yr 11.3 yr 565
Guardianship 9.6 yr 14.3 yr 185
Partition 4.3 yr 8.6 yr 180

Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 3,195 properties (11.7% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.

Repeat litigation patterns in Lake County

Of 22,694 unique property owners in court filings, 1,958 (8.6%) appear in multiple cases, including 655 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 83 cases spanning 76 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 27.1%.

22,694
Unique owners
1,958
Repeat filers (2+ cases)
8.6%
Repeat rate
655
Serial filers (3+ cases)

Repeat rate by case type

Case type Repeat owners Total owners Repeat rate
Divorce 1288 7263 17.7%
Probate 923 5609 16.5%
Partition 98 4600 2.1%
Pre-Foreclosure 73 4198 1.7%
Guardianship 536 1975 27.1%

Analysis based on 22,694 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.

Serial distressed properties in Lake County

Of 4,935 unique properties in court filings, 518 (10.5%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.3 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 12 months. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 29.2%.

4,935
Unique properties
518
Repeat-filing properties
10.5%
Serial distress rate
12 mo
Avg time between filings

Serial distress rate by case type

Case type Serial properties Total properties Serial rate
Divorce 355 2668 13.3%
Probate 123 1187 10.4%
Pre-Foreclosure 139 749 18.6%
Partition 93 342 27.2%
Guardianship 71 243 29.2%

Analysis based on 4,935 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.

Land vs improvement value composition

Across 5,404 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 16.8% (median land value $34,800, median improvement value $170,700). 60 properties (1.1%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Probate cases skew most land-heavy (median 17.3%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (16.3%).

16.8%
Median land share
$34,800
Median land value
$170,700
Median improvement value
1.1%
Land-dominant (50%+)

Land share distribution

Land share bracket Properties % of total
Under 10% 386 7.1%
10–20% 3,500 64.8%
20–30% 1,251 23.1%
30–50% 207 3.8%
50–70% 36 0.7%
Over 70% 24 0.4%

Land share by case type

Case type Filings Median land %
Divorce 2,824 16.8%
Probate 1,187 17.3%
Pre-Foreclosure 773 16.3%
Partition 357 16.7%
Guardianship 254 16.4%

Analysis of 5,404 properties (19.7% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.

Prior sale value trajectory

Across 949 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is +21.3%. 368 properties (38.8%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -18.0% value change vs +90.1% for long-hold (10+ yr). Probate cases have the highest underwater rate (41.5%) while Guardianship has the lowest (36.4%).

+21.3%
Median value change
$180,000
Median purchase price
$189,700
Median assessed value
38.8%
Underwater properties

Value change distribution

Value change bracket Properties % of total
50%+ loss 80 8.4%
20–50% loss 152 16.0%
0–20% loss 136 14.3%
0–20% gain 100 10.5%
20–50% gain 186 19.6%
50–100% gain 141 14.9%
100%+ gain 154 16.2%

Holding period vs value change

-18.0%
Short hold (<5 yr) median change
(369 properties)
+90.1%
Long hold (10+ yr) median change
(173 properties)

Value trajectory by case type

Case type Filings Median change Underwater
Divorce 461 +18.7% 38.8%
Pre-Foreclosure 252 +21.6% 36.5%
Probate 171 +31.4% 41.5%
Guardianship 55 +25.5% 36.4%

Analysis of 949 properties (3.5% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.

Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites

The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.

Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.

Methodology and data sources

Top cities for filings within Lake County

Where filings concentrate inside Lake County, by parsed property city or township.

City / Township Filings Share (of city-parsed filings)
Hammond69315.1%
Gary54912.0%
Crown Point50110.9%
Hobart3437.5%
Merrillville2916.3%

Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Lake County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.

Related Indiana guides

Indiana foreclosure process How to find leads in Indiana Top foreclosure counties in Indiana Indiana statewide analysis

Get the underlying Lake County filings

Subscribe to Lake County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.

View Lake County availability

Want updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.

Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Lake County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-18, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/lake-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)