Home › Reports › Lake County, Indiana

Lake County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence

Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Lake County court dockets. Updated 2026-09-28. See methodology.

Data current as of 2026-08-18 · refreshes nightly #2 of 25 Indiana counties we cover by filing volume
Investor takeaway

About Lake County

Lake County is a county located in the U.S. state of Indiana. In 2020, its population was 498,700, making it Indiana's second-most populous county. The county seat is Crown Point. The county is part of Northwest Indiana and the Chicago metropolitan area, and contains a mix of urban, suburban and rural areas.

Source: Wikipedia

Get Lake County leads delivered daily

Owner names and property details the day each case is filed, with owner phone lookups where offered. 7-day free trial.

See Lake County Leads →

At a glance

29925 property-related court filings tracked across 81 months (Jan 2020 to Sep 2026).

372 typical monthly filing volume.

#2 of 25 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.

14% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (4093 of 29925 filings).

$195,035 median estimated property value across the 18558 filings with property-enrichment data (62% coverage).

3.6% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-07). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.

Filing type breakdown

Filing typeFilingsShare
Divorce 10570 35.3%
Probate 7005 23.4%
Pre-Foreclosure 5048 16.9%
Partition 4724 15.8%
Guardianship 2569 8.6%
Inherited Property 9 0.0%

Each row is a distinct case as recorded on the county docket.

Get the full Lake County lead list

Day-of-filing access with owner names and property details, plus owner phone lookups where offered. 7-day free trial, no credit card.

Start Free Trial

Monthly filing activity

MonthFilingsvs prior
Jan 2020 439
Feb 2020 427 -12
Mar 2020 362 -65
Apr 2020 202 -160
May 2020 252 +50
Jun 2020 406 +154
Jul 2020 380 -26
Aug 2020 360 -20
Sep 2020 416 +56
Oct 2020 383 -33
Nov 2020 294 -89
Dec 2020 306 +12
Jan 2021 335 +29
Feb 2021 317 -18
Mar 2021 456 +139
Apr 2021 430 -26
May 2021 347 -83
Jun 2021 380 +33
Jul 2021 333 -47
Aug 2021 376 +43
Sep 2021 360 -16
Oct 2021 379 +19
Nov 2021 331 -48
Dec 2021 297 -34
Jan 2022 439 +142
Feb 2022 376 -63
Mar 2022 510 +134
Apr 2022 403 -107
May 2022 423 +20
Jun 2022 409 -14
Jul 2022 324 -85
Aug 2022 446 +122
Sep 2022 369 -77
Oct 2022 371 +2
Nov 2022 332 -39
Dec 2022 299 -33
Jan 2023 411 +112
Feb 2023 418 +7
Mar 2023 443 +25
Apr 2023 350 -93
May 2023 373 +23
Jun 2023 333 -40
Jul 2023 374 +41
Aug 2023 441 +67
Sep 2023 398 -43
Oct 2023 407 +9
Nov 2023 374 -33
Dec 2023 369 -5
Jan 2024 332 -37
Feb 2024 408 +76
Mar 2024 421 +13
Apr 2024 373 -48
May 2024 382 +9
Jun 2024 352 -30
Jul 2024 361 +9
Aug 2024 377 +16
Sep 2024 348 -29
Oct 2024 372 +24
Nov 2024 332 -40
Dec 2024 366 +34
Jan 2025 383 +17
Feb 2025 339 -44
Mar 2025 353 +14
Apr 2025 369 +16
May 2025 371 +2
Jun 2025 305 -66
Jul 2025 430 +125
Aug 2025 282 -148
Sep 2025 317 +35
Oct 2025 411 +94
Nov 2025 262 -149
Dec 2025 306 +44
Jan 2026 368 +62
Feb 2026 465 +97
Mar 2026 485 +20
Apr 2026 413 -72
May 2026 442 +29
Jun 2026 380 -62
Jul 2026 381 +1
Aug 2026 289 -92
Sep 2026 190 -99

Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.

Geographic concentration by ZIP

Top 10 ZIPs in Lake County account for 30.2% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.

ZIPCityFilingsShare
46307 CROWN POINT 1855 6.2%
46410 Merrillville 1270 4.2%
46342 Hobart 1174 3.9%
46375 Schererville 819 2.7%
46322 HIGHLAND 689 2.3%
46324 Hammond 677 2.3%
46356 Lowell 671 2.2%
46321 MUNSTER 653 2.2%
46323 HAMMOND 630 2.1%
46303 CEDAR LAKE 596 2.0%

Based on filings with a parseable property address (50% of Lake County filings).

Target these ZIP codes before your competitors

Keystone delivers new filings the same day they hit the court docket, with owner phone lookups where offered.

See Availability

Property value distribution

Estimated valueFilingsShare
Under $75k 1897 10.2%
$75k - $150k 4384 23.6%
$150k - $250k 6145 33.1%
$250k - $400k 4399 23.7%
$400k+ 1733 9.3%

Source: third-party property enrichment (62% coverage on Lake County filings). Median $195,035; mean $224,326.

These properties are in your market right now

Get owner names and property details (owner phone lookups where offered) for every new filing in Lake County.

Check Availability

Day-of-week filing pattern

DayFilingsShare
Sun 301 1.0%
Mon 5875 19.6%
Tue 6235 20.8%
Wed 5834 19.5%
Thu 5934 19.8%
Fri 5512 18.4%
Sat 234 0.8%

Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 29925 filings with a parseable date.

Case lifecycle (foreclosure)

Median time between key court-process milestones, computed from docket-entry timestamps on the 454 cases with documented filing-event data:

MilestoneMedian daysSample size
Complaint filed → summons served9 days249 cases
Complaint filed → judgment68 days28 cases

Source: court docket entries. Only foreclosure cases under active monitoring are tracked through milestones. Cases without a documented filing or service event are excluded from this calculation.

Building characteristics

Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 19243 filings with characteristic data:

IndicatorValue
Median year built1969
Median living area1,402 sqft
Median lot size0.2 acres
Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment)0.0%

Housing stock + distress signals

Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 216330 Lake County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.

Indicator Lake County US average
Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale)10.6%10.5%
Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage63.7%60.8%
Pre-1940 housing stock14.8%12.3%
Single-family detached share of housing stock71.5%61.2%
Residents age 65 or older17.4%17.3%

Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.

Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)

HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Lake County sits within the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.

Unit size Fair market rent / month
Efficiency / studio$959
1-bedroom$1,082
2-bedroom$1,317
3-bedroom$1,612
4-bedroom$1,744

Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.

New construction (market momentum)

Annual building permits filed in Lake County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.

Indicator Value
Total housing units permitted (2025)1,262
Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025)-23.5%
Single-family share of permits (2025)100.0%
Single-family units permitted1,262
Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building)0

Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.

Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency

Lake County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.

IndicatorValuePeriod
Indiana home price index (year-over-year)+4.6%2026-04-01
Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020)+67.6%2026-04-01
National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family)1.86%2026-04-01

Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.

Local-market benchmark

Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:

IndicatorFiling-weighted average
Median household income (where filings cluster)$80,849
Median home value$236,455
Owner-occupancy rate77.9%
Renter share of households22.1%
Median gross rent$1,239/mo

Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 10 top ZIPs.

Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Lake County

Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").

PlaintiffForeclosure filings
U.S. BANK TRUST N.A 10
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB 6
U.S. BANK N.A 5
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC 5
NEWREZ LLC 5
U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, N.A 4
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 3
MIDFIRST BANK 3
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC 3
ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC 3

Source: plaintiff names extracted from Lake County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.

Post-filing sale outcomes in Lake County

What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 19457 filings (65.0% of all 29925 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.

18.6%
of all filings had a confirmed post-filing sale (floor)
$205,000
median post-filing sale price

Sale rates by filing type

Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.

Filing type Filings Confirmed sold Sale rate
Probate 7005 1787 25.5%
Pre-Foreclosure 5048 943 18.7%
Divorce 10570 1931 18.3%
Partition 4724 685 14.5%
Guardianship 2569 218 8.5%

How sales relate to the filing

Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 78.9% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.

Attribution Meaning Sales Share
Sold within 2 years of filing Sold within 2 years of the filing — inside the window where the case is a plausible cause 4161 74.8%
Sold later (not attributable) Sold more than 2 years after filing — recorded, but too late to attribute to the case 1007 18.1%
Sold during the case Sold while the case was still open — the strongest link between the filing and the sale 229 4.1%
Confirmed did not sell Confirmed it did NOT sell — the ownership record covers the whole period and shows no transfer 156 2.8%
Undetermined No sale has been recorded yet — this is an open question, not a finding of 'did not sell' 8 0.1%

Who bought the property

Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.

Buyer Sales Share
Owner-occupant 3126 77.2%
Investor 693 17.1%
Bank / auction 157 3.9%
Government agency 53 1.3%
Family / non-arm's-length 21 0.5%

Based on 4050 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.

Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 19457 of 29925 filings (65.0% parcel coverage). Prices based on 2234 sales with recorded sale amounts.

Be the first investor to reach these owners

Lake County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.

Start Free Trial

FEMA flood zone exposure

Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 1054 properties with geocoded locations.

1.3%
in Special Flood Hazard Area
14
properties in high-risk zones
Zone Properties Share
X 996 94.5%
X-levee 25 2.4%
X-500yr 18 1.7%
AE 11 1.0%
AH 2 0.2%
A 1 0.1%

Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 1054 properties checked.

Filing velocity by case type

How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.

Case type Total Share Trend
Divorce 10570 35.3% -11.8%
Probate 7005 23.4% -13.8%
Pre-Foreclosure 5048 16.9% -23.1%
Partition 4724 15.8% -56.0%
Guardianship 2569 8.6% -12.4%
Inherited Property 9 0.0% --

Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.

Lender concentration analysis

Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.

476
HHI score
Competitive
Market type
24.2%
Top 3 share
Lender / Plaintiff Filings Share
US BANK TRUST NA 10 8.6%
US BANK NA 9 7.8%
NEWREZ LLC 9 7.8%
ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC 8 6.9%
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION 7 6.0%

HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 116 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.

Seasonal filing patterns

Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Nov. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.

Month Avg filings Relative
Jan 386.7
89%
Feb 392.9
91%
Mar 432.9
100%
Apr 362.9
84%
May 370
85%
Jun 366.4
85%
Jul 369
85%
Aug 367.3
85%
Sep 368
85%
Oct 387.2
89%
Nov 320.8
74%
Dec 323.8
75%

Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.3x peak-to-trough ratio.

ZIP code distress hotspots

Distress is geographically dispersed across 35 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.

ZIP Area Filings Share Median value
46307 Crown Point 1855 6.2% $282,200
46410 Merrillville 1270 4.2% $188,100
46342 Hobart 1174 3.9% $179,800
46375 Schererville 819 2.7% $295,050
46322 Highland 689 2.3% $230,830
46324 Hammond 677 2.3% $146,767
46356 Lowell 671 2.2% $250,950
46321 Munster 653 2.2% $301,800
46323 Hammond 630 2.1% $144,738
46303 Cedar Lake 596 2.0% $251,600

Top 10 of 35 ZIP codes with filings.

Non-resident owner analysis

Most filings (86%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.

13.7%
Non-resident owners
Case type Total filings Non-resident %
Divorce 10570 13.4%
Probate 7005 17.7%
Pre-Foreclosure 5048 10.0%
Partition 4724 13.8%
Guardianship 2569 10.9%
Inherited Property 9 0.0%

Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.

Target absentee and distressed owners directly

Every lead includes the owner's name and property details; owner phone lookups where offered.

Claim Lake County

Distress composition and shifts

Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. Partition share is declining. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.

Case type Recent share Earlier share Shift
Divorce 35.5% 35.2% +0.3pp
Pre-Foreclosure 26.3% 16.7% +9.6pp (rising)
Probate 23.0% 23.4% -0.4pp
Guardianship 11.2% 8.5% +2.7pp
Partition 4.0% 16.2% -12.2pp (falling)
Inherited Property 0.0% 0.0% +0.0pp

Distress diversity score: 2.06 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.

Motivation breakdown

Of 283 filings with a tagged motivation, the most common is Equity Division Sale (44.9%), followed by High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure (39.9%). This motivation breakdown is captured at the court-filing stage and is not available from property-data aggregators.

Motivation / sub-type Filings Share
Equity Division Sale 127 44.9%
High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure 113 39.9%
Inherited Property 43 15.2%

Based on 283 filings tagged with a motivation sub-type at the court-filing stage.

Court Docket Activity

Across 12766 tracked cases, the average case has 32 docket entries (median 25). 77.8% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Divorce cases are the most court-active at 40.0 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.

31.6
Avg. docket entries per case
25
Median entries per case
516
Most active case
Activity level Cases Share
Early stage (1-5 events) 215 1.7%
Mid-process (6-15 events) 2621 20.5%
Advanced (16+ events) 9930 77.8%
Docket activity by case type
Case type Avg. events Cases tracked
Divorce 40.0 5351
Guardianship 29.2 1193
Pre-Foreclosure 28.5 2838
Probate 21.6 3382

Based on 12766 cases with docket event tracking from Lake County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.

Procedural Stage Pipeline

Of 455 tracked cases, 18.7% reached the service-of-process stage, 60.9% progressed to a hearing.

Case progression funnel
All tracked cases
455
Defendant served
85 (18.7%)
Response filed
177 (38.9%)
Hearing scheduled
277 (60.9%)
Terminal outcome Cases Share
Dismissed 55 12.1%
Settled 20 4.4%
Execution / enforcement 17 3.7%
Default judgment 12 2.6%
Judgment entered 9 2.0%
Sheriff sale 3 0.7%
Progression by case type
Case type Cases Served Hearing Resolved
Divorce 201 5.0% 81.1% 17.9%
Pre-Foreclosure 188 39.9% 33.0% 31.9%
Probate 61 0.0% 78.7% 0.0%

Based on 455 cases with 709 recorded stage transitions from Lake County court docket entries. Stages identified from docket events: service of process, responses, hearings, judgments, settlements, and dismissals.

Property Value Profile

The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $189,700. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $210,900), while Partition filings trend lower (median $134,400). The largest segment (48.4%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.

$189,700
Median assessed value
$223,551
Average assessed value
19172
Properties with values
Value range Properties Share
Under $100K 3738 19.5%
$100K - $250K 9288 48.4%
$250K - $500K 5378 28.1%
$500K - $1M 686 3.6%
Over $1M 82 0.4%
Value breakdown by case type
Case type Median value Avg value Properties
Divorce $210,900 $241,026 7110
Probate $186,035 $213,429 4923
Pre-Foreclosure $181,546 $203,034 4074
Partition $134,400 $207,475 1797
Guardianship $181,400 $254,132 1259
Inherited Property $176,500 $173,833 9

Based on county assessor records for 19172 properties with court filings (64.1% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.

Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code

Across 29 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46307 (Crown Point) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (1855 cases). 15 of 29 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 49.

75/100
Highest ZIP score
29
ZIPs scored
49
Average score
Rank ZIP Code Area Score Filings Avg Value Absentee %
#1 46307 Crown Point
75
1855 — 0%
#2 46410 Merrillville
64
1270 — 0%
#3 46342 Hobart
62
1174 — 0%
#4 46375 Schererville
55
819 — 0%
#5 46322 Highland
53
689 — 0%
#6 46356 Lowell
53
671 — 0%
#7 46324 Hammond
53
677 — 0%
#8 46323 Hammond
52
630 — 0%
#9 46321 Munster
52
653 — 0%
#10 46303 Cedar Lake
51
596 — 0%
How the score is calculated

The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:

  • Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
  • Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
  • Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
  • Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set

Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.

Based on 29925 court filings across 29 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.

Distress Capital Analysis

$4,285,915,186 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 19172 court-filed properties. 75% of properties with equity data carry 20%+ equity, signaling owners with real financial stakes in resolution. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($1,713,695,172 across 7110 properties).

$4,286M
Total Value at Risk
19172
Properties Valued
$189,700
Median Value

Equity Position of Distressed Properties

High (20%+)
146 (75.3%)
Moderate (1-20%)
33 (17.0%)
Low/Underwater (≤0%)
15 (7.7%)

Median equity position: 39.8% · Based on 194 properties with equity data

Capital at Risk by Filing Type

Filing Type Total Value Properties Avg Value High Equity %
Divorce
$1,713,695,172
7110 $241,026 81.3%
Probate
$1,050,711,583
4923 $213,429 92.9%
Pre-Foreclosure
$827,159,544
4074 $203,034 67.6%
Partition
$372,832,523
1797 $207,475 --
Guardianship
$319,951,864
1259 $254,132 --
Inherited Property
$1,564,500
9 $173,833 --
High-Equity Distressed Properties
144 properties with 20%+ equity totaling $43,785,673 in assessed value (0.8% of all valued filings). Average property value: $304,067. These represent the highest-value investor targets — owners with real money at stake who are most likely to negotiate.

Based on 19172 properties with assessor valuations (64.1% of 29925 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.

Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis

29,893 court filings tracked with 6,102 resolved (20.4% absorption rate). Resolved cases take an average of 321 days. Probate cases resolve fastest (avg 279 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (avg 368 days).

20.4%
Absorption Rate
23,791
Active Case Backlog
321
Avg Days to Resolve
Month New Filings Resolved Net Inflow Absorption
Jan 2020 438 33 +405
7.5%
Feb 2020 427 26 +401
6.1%
Mar 2020 362 18 +344
5.0%
Apr 2020 202 13 +189
6.4%
May 2020 252 21 +231
8.3%
Jun 2020 406 9 +397
2.2%
Jul 2020 380 20 +360
5.3%
Aug 2020 360 15 +345
4.2%
Sep 2020 416 19 +397
4.6%
Oct 2020 383 159 +224
41.5%
Nov 2020 294 13 +281
4.4%
Dec 2020 306 6 +300
2.0%
Jan 2021 335 19 +316
5.7%
Feb 2021 317 20 +297
6.3%
Mar 2021 456 18 +438
3.9%
Apr 2021 430 24 +406
5.6%
May 2021 347 13 +334
3.7%
Jun 2021 380 12 +368
3.2%
Jul 2021 333 8 +325
2.4%
Aug 2021 376 16 +360
4.3%
Sep 2021 360 24 +336
6.7%
Oct 2021 379 20 +359
5.3%
Nov 2021 331 13 +318
3.9%
Dec 2021 297 12 +285
4.0%
Jan 2022 439 24 +415
5.5%
Feb 2022 376 20 +356
5.3%
Mar 2022 510 37 +473
7.3%
Apr 2022 403 30 +373
7.4%
May 2022 423 6 +417
1.4%
Jun 2022 409 124 +285
30.3%
Jul 2022 324 18 +306
5.6%
Aug 2022 446 94 +352
21.1%
Sep 2022 369 105 +264
28.5%
Oct 2022 371 20 +351
5.4%
Nov 2022 332 87 +245
26.2%
Dec 2022 299 31 +268
10.4%
Jan 2023 411 21 +390
5.1%
Feb 2023 418 20 +398
4.8%
Mar 2023 443 34 +409
7.7%
Apr 2023 350 23 +327
6.6%
May 2023 373 10 +363
2.7%
Jun 2023 333 26 +307
7.8%
Jul 2023 374 16 +358
4.3%
Aug 2023 441 30 +411
6.8%
Sep 2023 398 104 +294
26.1%
Oct 2023 407 76 +331
18.7%
Nov 2023 374 78 +296
20.9%
Dec 2023 369 17 +352
4.6%
Jan 2024 332 159 +173
47.9%
Feb 2024 408 175 +233
42.9%
Mar 2024 421 180 +241
42.8%
Apr 2024 373 160 +213
42.9%
May 2024 382 170 +212
44.5%
Jun 2024 352 149 +203
42.3%
Jul 2024 361 175 +186
48.5%
Aug 2024 377 159 +218
42.2%
Sep 2024 348 168 +180
48.3%
Oct 2024 372 183 +189
49.2%
Nov 2024 332 144 +188
43.4%
Dec 2024 366 158 +208
43.2%
Jan 2025 383 181 +202
47.3%
Feb 2025 339 176 +163
51.9%
Mar 2025 353 190 +163
53.8%
Apr 2025 369 189 +180
51.2%
May 2025 371 177 +194
47.7%
Jun 2025 305 155 +150
50.8%
Jul 2025 430 194 +236
45.1%
Aug 2025 282 127 +155
45.0%
Sep 2025 317 135 +182
42.6%
Oct 2025 411 177 +234
43.1%
Nov 2025 262 102 +160
38.9%
Dec 2025 306 107 +199
35.0%
Jan 2026 433 130 +303
30.0%
Feb 2026 465 123 +342
26.5%
Mar 2026 485 149 +336
30.7%
Apr 2026 413 77 +336
18.6%
May 2026 442 67 +375
15.2%
Jun 2026 380 40 +340
10.5%
Jul 2026 381 21 +360
5.5%
Aug 2026 289 3 +286
1.0%
Sep 2026 94 0 +94
0.0%

Resolution by Case Type

Case Type Filed Resolved Absorption Avg Days
Divorce 10547 3892 36.9% 328
Probate 6989 309 4.4% 279
Pre-Foreclosure 5058 1799 35.6% 319
Partition 4724 1 0.0% n/a
Guardianship 2566 101 3.9% 368
Inherited Property 9 0 0.0% n/a
Resolution Speed Comparison
Probate cases resolve fastest at an average of 279 days, while Guardianship cases take the longest at 368 days. This gap reflects the different legal processes and court scheduling for each case type.

Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 6102 resolved cases out of 29893 total filings.

Equity-Outcome Correlation

19446 properties with assessed values analyzed across equity levels. High-equity properties (20%+) represent 0.7% of filings with a 27.8% resolution rate. Moderate (1-20%) properties resolve fastest (avg 35 days) vs Unknown Equity (avg 333 days).

19446
Properties Analyzed
5099
With Outcomes
35
Fastest Avg Days
Equity Level Properties Share Resolved Resolution Rate Avg Days
High (20%+)
144
0.7% 40 27.8% 55
Moderate (1-20%)
33
0.2% 7 21.2% 35
Underwater (≤0%)
12
0.1% 5 41.7% 77
Unknown Equity
19257
99.0% 5047 26.2% 333

Equity Profile by Case Type

Case Type Properties High Equity % Resolution Rate Avg Days
Divorce 7178 0.8% 42.6% 329
Probate 4972 0.3% 5.2% 278
Pre-Foreclosure 4099 1.6% 41.4% 322
Partition 1874 0.1% 0.1% —
Guardianship 1314 0.2% 6.4% 368
Inherited Property 9 0.0% 0.0% —
Underwater properties resolve more often
Properties with ≤0% equity have a 41.7% resolution rate vs 27.8% for high-equity properties.

Equity positions derived from county assessor data (assessed values minus outstanding liens where available). Resolution outcomes classified from court docket entries. Only properties with non-zero assessed values are included in this analysis.

Property Type Distribution

90.1% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (5.7%).

Single Family
Most common (90.1%)
18,739
Properties classified
7
Property categories
Property type Count Share Distribution
Single Family 16,882 90.1%
Duplex/Multi-Family 1,065 5.7%
Residential 449 2.4%
Commercial 124 0.7%
Agricultural 85 0.5%
Industrial 72 0.4%
Condo/Townhouse 62 0.3%
Property type by case type
Case type Dominant property type Share Properties
Divorce Single Family 91.4% 7,012
Probate Single Family 89.4% 4,713
Pre-Foreclosure Single Family 91.7% 4,055
Partition Single Family 83.9% 1,723
Guardianship Single Family 88.8% 1,228
Inherited Property Single Family 100.0% 8

Property classifications from county assessor records for 18,739 properties (62.7% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.

Case Aging & Stall Analysis

20,393 cases (68.2%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Probate cases resolve fastest (median 227 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (median 295 days). 109 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.

20,393
Cases stalled 1yr+
68.2%
of all filings
29,893
Total tracked
Age Total Resolved Still active Resolution rate
<30 days 109 0 109 0.0%
30-90 days 655 24 631 3.7%
3-6 months 1,218 182 1,036 14.9%
6-12 months 2,425 803 1,622 33.1%
1-2 years 4,189 2,002 2,187 47.8%
2+ years 21,297 3,091 18,206 14.5%
Resolution speed by case type
Case type Total Resolved Rate Median days
Divorce 10,547 3892 36.9% 254d
Probate 6,989 309 4.4% 227d
Pre-Foreclosure 5,058 1799 35.6% 253d
Partition 4,724 1 0.0% —
Guardianship 2,566 101 3.9% 295d

Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.

Property Age & Distress Profile

17,452 filings (58.4% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (37%). Newer properties (2000+) average $383,332 — 2.5x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($151,540). 1980–1999 cases resolve fastest (median 218d) vs 1960–1979 (302d).

17,452
Properties with year built
58.4%
Coverage
Pre-1960
Most common era (36.9%)
Construction era Filings Share Avg value Median days
Pre-1960 6,434 36.9% $151,540 248d
1960–1979 4,345 24.9% $206,656 302d
1980–1999 2,846 16.3% $340,245 218d
2000+ 3,827 21.9% $383,332 232d

Value trend: 2000+ properties average $383,332 — 2.53x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($151,540).

Top case types by construction era
Pre-1960: Divorce (35.5%), Probate (24.2%), Pre-Foreclosure (23.1%), Partition (10.6%)
1960–1979: Divorce (36.0%), Probate (26.9%), Pre-Foreclosure (22.9%), Partition (7.3%)
1980–1999: Divorce (37.6%), Probate (30.7%), Pre-Foreclosure (18.7%), Partition (6.9%)
2000+: Divorce (46.8%), Probate (23.4%), Pre-Foreclosure (16.2%), Partition (7.1%)

Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.

Municipality filing concentration in Lake County

Court filings in Lake County span 576 municipalities. Gary leads with 2526 filings (14.0% of total), predominantly Divorce (37.1%). Filings show moderate geographic spread — the top 3 municipalities account for 38% of filings.

576
Municipalities
38.1%
Top 3 share
Moderate
Geographic spread
Municipality Filings Share Top case type
Gary 2526 14.0% Divorce (37.1%)
Hammond 2368 13.1% Divorce (38.7%)
Crown Point 1982 11.0% Divorce (44.8%)
Merrillville 1511 8.4% Divorce (40.0%)
Hobart 1281 7.1% Divorce (39.2%)
Schererville 817 4.5% Divorce (38.9%)
Lowell 772 4.3% Divorce (47.4%)
Highland 735 4.1% Divorce (38.6%)
Munster 686 3.8% Divorce (41.5%)
Cedar Lake 645 3.6% Divorce (50.4%)
Dyer 609 3.4% Divorce (41.7%)
Griffith 600 3.3% Divorce (41.2%)
East Chicago 597 3.3% Divorce (43.7%)
Lake Station 483 2.7% Divorce (36.6%)
Saint John 482 2.7% Divorce (48.5%)

Top 15 of 576 municipalities with court filings. Data from 18,071 filings (60% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.

Property Value Distribution

The median property value in distressed filings is $183,478, with the largest concentration (24.8%) in the $200K–$300K range. Divorce filings have the highest median value ($195,550) while Partition filings are lowest ($118,450).

$183,478
Median value
$287,379
Average value
19,446
Properties valued
Price range Count Share Distribution
Under $50K 1,677 8.6%
$50K–$100K 2,370 12.2%
$100K–$150K 3,308 17.0%
$150K–$200K 3,457 17.8%
$200K–$300K 4,820 24.8%
$300K–$500K 3,004 15.4%
$500K+ 810 4.2%
Value by case type
Case type Median value Average value Properties
Divorce $195,550 $247,917 7,178
Probate $186,400 $215,360 4,972
Pre-Foreclosure $181,800 $204,529 4,099
Partition $118,450 $205,043 1,874
Guardianship $186,500 $1,151,645 1,314

Assessed property values from county assessor records for 19,446 properties (65.0% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.

Ownership Duration Before Filing

The median ownership duration before a court filing is 6.3 years, with 36.5% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Probate cases show the longest tenure (10.8 yr median) vs. Partition (4.8 yr).

6.3 yr
Median tenure
10.4 yr
Average tenure
9,847
Properties tracked
Ownership period Count Share Distribution
Under 2 years 1,764 17.9%
2–5 years 2,504 25.4%
5–10 years 1,981 20.1%
10–20 years 1,942 19.7%
20+ years 1,656 16.8%
Tenure by case type
Case type Median tenure Average tenure Properties
Divorce 5.5 yr 8.9 yr 4,169
Pre-Foreclosure 6.5 yr 10.0 yr 2,455
Probate 10.8 yr 14.9 yr 1,543
Partition 4.8 yr 9.4 yr 1,037
Guardianship 7.4 yr 12.7 yr 635

Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 9,847 properties (32.9% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.

Repeat litigation patterns in Lake County

Of 26,597 unique property owners in court filings, 1,785 (6.7%) appear in multiple cases, including 447 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 50 cases spanning 73 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 20.3%.

26,597
Unique owners
1,785
Repeat filers (2+ cases)
6.7%
Repeat rate
447
Serial filers (3+ cases)

Repeat rate by case type

Case type Repeat owners Total owners Repeat rate
Divorce 850 9222 9.2%
Probate 705 6468 10.9%
Pre-Foreclosure 318 4747 6.7%
Partition 91 4602 2.0%
Guardianship 439 2167 20.3%

Analysis based on 26,597 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.

Serial distressed properties in Lake County

Of 16,961 unique properties in court filings, 1,891 (11.1%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.4 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 16 months. Partition properties have the highest repeat rate at 22.9%.

16,961
Unique properties
1,891
Repeat-filing properties
11.1%
Serial distress rate
16 mo
Avg time between filings

Serial distress rate by case type

Case type Serial properties Total properties Serial rate
Divorce 972 6644 14.6%
Probate 509 4785 10.6%
Pre-Foreclosure 723 3681 19.6%
Partition 375 1634 22.9%
Guardianship 254 1150 22.1%

Analysis based on 16,961 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.

Land vs improvement value composition

Across 19,059 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 17.2% (median land value $33,400, median improvement value $160,700). 250 properties (1.3%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Probate cases skew most land-heavy (median 17.8%) while Guardianship skews most improvement-heavy (16.8%).

17.2%
Median land share
$33,400
Median land value
$160,700
Median improvement value
1.3%
Land-dominant (50%+)

Land share distribution

Land share bracket Properties % of total
Under 10% 1,392 7.3%
10–20% 11,837 62.1%
20–30% 4,814 25.3%
30–50% 766 4.0%
50–70% 177 0.9%
Over 70% 73 0.4%

Land share by case type

Case type Filings Median land %
Divorce 7,109 16.9%
Probate 4,869 17.8%
Pre-Foreclosure 4,082 17.0%
Partition 1,711 17.0%
Guardianship 1,279 16.8%

Analysis of 19,059 properties (63.7% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.

Prior sale value trajectory

Across 6,648 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -11.6%. 4,294 properties (64.6%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -3.7% value change vs +1.3% for long-hold (10+ yr). Probate cases have the highest underwater rate (68.3%) while Pre-Foreclosure has the lowest (53.0%).

-11.6%
Median value change
$215,000
Median purchase price
$181,350
Median assessed value
64.6%
Underwater properties

Value change distribution

Value change bracket Properties % of total
50%+ loss 653 9.8%
20–50% loss 1,916 28.8%
0–20% loss 1,725 25.9%
0–20% gain 932 14.0%
20–50% gain 561 8.4%
50–100% gain 348 5.2%
100%+ gain 513 7.7%

Holding period vs value change

-3.7%
Short hold (<5 yr) median change
(1,939 properties)
+1.3%
Long hold (10+ yr) median change
(690 properties)

Value trajectory by case type

Case type Filings Median change Underwater
Divorce 2,787 -14.4% 68.2%
Probate 1,517 -12.1% 68.3%
Pre-Foreclosure 1,374 -2.2% 53.0%
Partition 690 -18.0% 67.1%
Guardianship 279 -9.1% 59.1%

Analysis of 6,648 properties (22.2% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.

Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites

The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.

Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.

Methodology and data sources

Top cities for filings within Lake County

Where filings concentrate inside Lake County, by parsed property city or township.

City / Township Filings Share (of city-parsed filings)
Gary179614.9%
Hammond176914.7%
Crown Point130710.8%
Merrillville10508.7%
Hobart9117.6%

Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Lake County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.

Related Indiana guides

Indiana foreclosure process How to find leads in Indiana Top foreclosure counties in Indiana Indiana statewide analysis

Get the underlying Lake County filings

Subscribe to Lake County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. 7-day free trial.

View Lake County availability

Want updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.

Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Lake County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-09-28, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/lake-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)