Allen County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Allen County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-31. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+50.0%) — last 2 complete months (522 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (348 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- 36.9% off-site owners — share of filings where the owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could be out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties (we don't distinguish; the underlying signal is "not living there").
- Max gross cap rate 6.5% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $13,356/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $206,000 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 40.0% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in Allen County during the observed window.
About Allen County
Allen County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. As of the 2020 Census, the population was 385,410, making it the third-most populous county in Indiana. The county seat and largest city is Fort Wayne, the second largest city in Indiana.
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
20691 verified property-related court filings tracked across 79 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
262 typical monthly filing volume.
#8 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
8% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (1732 of 20691 filings).
$206,000 median estimated property value across the 10480 filings with property-enrichment data (51% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8282 | 40.0% | |
| Probate | 6220 | 30.1% | |
| Partition | 2142 | 10.4% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2076 | 10.0% | |
| Guardianship | 1969 | 9.5% | |
| Inherited Property | 2 | 0.0% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full Allen County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 354 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 324 | -30 | |
| Mar 2020 | 297 | -27 | |
| Apr 2020 | 177 | -120 | |
| May 2020 | 212 | +35 | |
| Jun 2020 | 286 | +74 | |
| Jul 2020 | 317 | +31 | |
| Aug 2020 | 287 | -30 | |
| Sep 2020 | 294 | +7 | |
| Oct 2020 | 299 | +5 | |
| Nov 2020 | 234 | -65 | |
| Dec 2020 | 267 | +33 | |
| Jan 2021 | 277 | +10 | |
| Feb 2021 | 272 | -5 | |
| Mar 2021 | 373 | +101 | |
| Apr 2021 | 275 | -98 | |
| May 2021 | 284 | +9 | |
| Jun 2021 | 311 | +27 | |
| Jul 2021 | 290 | -21 | |
| Aug 2021 | 298 | +8 | |
| Sep 2021 | 269 | -29 | |
| Oct 2021 | 280 | +11 | |
| Nov 2021 | 258 | -22 | |
| Dec 2021 | 268 | +10 | |
| Jan 2022 | 304 | +36 | |
| Feb 2022 | 313 | +9 | |
| Mar 2022 | 431 | +118 | |
| Apr 2022 | 329 | -102 | |
| May 2022 | 293 | -36 | |
| Jun 2022 | 356 | +63 | |
| Jul 2022 | 298 | -58 | |
| Aug 2022 | 334 | +36 | |
| Sep 2022 | 301 | -33 | |
| Oct 2022 | 295 | -6 | |
| Nov 2022 | 323 | +28 | |
| Dec 2022 | 268 | -55 | |
| Jan 2023 | 325 | +57 | |
| Feb 2023 | 325 | 0 | |
| Mar 2023 | 365 | +40 | |
| Apr 2023 | 292 | -73 | |
| May 2023 | 269 | -23 | |
| Jun 2023 | 299 | +30 | |
| Jul 2023 | 335 | +36 | |
| Aug 2023 | 336 | +1 | |
| Sep 2023 | 289 | -47 | |
| Oct 2023 | 319 | +30 | |
| Nov 2023 | 247 | -72 | |
| Dec 2023 | 261 | +14 | |
| Jan 2024 | 60 | -201 | |
| Feb 2024 | 310 | +250 | |
| Mar 2024 | 287 | -23 | |
| Apr 2024 | 323 | +36 | |
| May 2024 | 342 | +19 | |
| Jun 2024 | 281 | -61 | |
| Jul 2024 | 318 | +37 | |
| Aug 2024 | 341 | +23 | |
| Sep 2024 | 270 | -71 | |
| Oct 2024 | 330 | +60 | |
| Nov 2024 | 257 | -73 | |
| Dec 2024 | 249 | -8 | |
| Jan 2025 | 292 | +43 | |
| Feb 2025 | 305 | +13 | |
| Mar 2025 | 317 | +12 | |
| Apr 2025 | 66 | -251 | |
| May 2025 | 48 | -18 | |
| Jun 2025 | 46 | -2 | |
| Jul 2025 | 35 | -11 | |
| Aug 2025 | 39 | +4 | |
| Sep 2025 | 43 | +4 | |
| Oct 2025 | 51 | +8 | |
| Nov 2025 | 44 | -7 | |
| Dec 2025 | 31 | -13 | |
| Jan 2026 | 300 | +269 | |
| Feb 2026 | 249 | -51 | |
| Mar 2026 | 36 | -213 | |
| Apr 2026 | 312 | +276 | |
| May 2026 | 252 | -60 | |
| Jun 2026 | 270 | +18 | |
| Jul 2026 | 277 | +7 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 10 ZIPs in Allen County account for 27.3% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46835 | Fort Wayne | 870 | 4.2% | |
| 46815 | Fort Wayne | 722 | 3.5% | |
| 46804 | Fort Wayne | 699 | 3.4% | |
| 46825 | Fort Wayne | 574 | 2.8% | |
| 46845 | Fort Wayne | 559 | 2.7% | |
| 46806 | Fort Wayne | 492 | 2.4% | |
| 46818 | Fort Wayne | 474 | 2.3% | |
| 46774 | New Haven | 445 | 2.2% | |
| 46805 | Fort Wayne | 412 | 2.0% | |
| 46808 | Fort Wayne | 408 | 2.0% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (41% of Allen County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 602 | 5.7% | |
| $75k - $150k | 2226 | 21.2% | |
| $150k - $250k | 4080 | 38.9% | |
| $250k - $400k | 2568 | 24.5% | |
| $400k+ | 1004 | 9.6% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (51% coverage on Allen County filings). Median $206,000; mean $237,713.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Allen County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 113 | 0.5% | |
| Mon | 4032 | 19.5% | |
| Tue | 4373 | 21.1% | |
| Wed | 4168 | 20.1% | |
| Thu | 4034 | 19.5% | |
| Fri | 3880 | 18.8% | |
| Sat | 91 | 0.4% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 20691 filings with a parseable date.
Case lifecycle (foreclosure)
Median time between key court-process milestones, computed from docket-entry timestamps on the 36 cases with documented filing-event data:
| Milestone | Median days | Sample size |
|---|---|---|
| Complaint filed → summons served | 6 days | 20 cases |
| Complaint filed → judgment | 36 days | 1 cases |
Source: court docket entries. Only foreclosure cases under active monitoring are tracked through milestones. Cases without a documented filing or service event are excluded from this calculation.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 10875 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 1973 |
| Median living area | 2,172 sqft |
| Median lot size | 1.0 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 164456 Allen County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Allen County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 6.2% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 64.9% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 12.8% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 73.9% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 15.3% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Allen County sits within the Fort Wayne, IN (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $892 |
| 1-bedroom | $916 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,113 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,381 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,512 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Allen County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 1,388 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -25.4% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 93.7% |
| Single-family units permitted | 1,300 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 88 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Allen County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Local-market benchmark
Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:
| Indicator | Filing-weighted average |
|---|---|
| Median household income (where filings cluster) | $73,345 |
| Median home value | $192,452 |
| Owner-occupancy rate | 70.4% |
| Renter share of households | 29.6% |
| Median gross rent | $1,067/mo |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 10 top ZIPs.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Allen County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC | 2 |
| NEWREZ LLC | 2 |
| THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS | 1 |
| FIFTH THIRD BANK N.A | 1 |
| WILIMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB | 1 |
| U.S. BANK N.A. | 1 |
| U.S. BANK TRUST N.A. | 1 |
| FIRST MERCHANTS BANK | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Allen County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Allen County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 10935 filings (52.8% of all 20691 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Filings | Confirmed sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | 6220 | 1306 | 21.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2076 | 317 | 15.3% |
| Divorce | 8282 | 1139 | 13.8% |
| Partition | 2142 | 153 | 7.1% |
| Guardianship | 1969 | 80 | 4.1% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 57.5% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 1722 | 57.5% |
| Deferred | Sale happened well after the filing (over 1 year) — weaker filing connection | 669 | 22.3% |
| Concurrent | Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal | 450 | 15.0% |
| Pre-existing | Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded | 154 | 5.1% |
Who bought the property
Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.
| Buyer | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupant | 2439 | 82.1% |
| Investor | 412 | 13.9% |
| Bank / auction | 90 | 3.0% |
| Family / non-arm's-length | 16 | 0.5% |
| Government agency | 12 | 0.4% |
Based on 2969 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 10935 of 20691 filings (52.8% parcel coverage). Prices based on 88 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Allen County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 1013 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 950 | 93.8% |
| AE | 32 | 3.2% |
| X-levee | 17 | 1.7% |
| X-500yr | 13 | 1.3% |
| A | 1 | 0.1% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 1013 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8282 | 40.0% | +60.7% |
| Probate | 6220 | 30.1% | +39.9% |
| Partition | 2142 | 10.4% | +7.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2076 | 10.0% | +15.4% |
| Guardianship | 1969 | 9.5% | +20.5% |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Lender concentration analysis
Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.
| Lender / Plaintiff | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC | 2 | 20.0% |
| NEWREZ LLC | 2 | 20.0% |
| THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS | 1 | 10.0% |
| FIFTH THIRD BANK NA | 1 | 10.0% |
| WILIMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB | 1 | 10.0% |
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 10 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Dec. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 273.1 | 91% |
| Feb | 299.7 | 100% |
| Mar | 300.9 | 100% |
| Apr | 253.4 | 84% |
| May | 242.9 | 81% |
| Jun | 264.1 | 88% |
| Jul | 265.5 | 88% |
| Aug | 272.5 | 91% |
| Sep | 244.3 | 81% |
| Oct | 262.3 | 87% |
| Nov | 227.2 | 76% |
| Dec | 224 | 74% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.3x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 42 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46835 | Fort Wayne | 870 | 4.2% | $226,100 |
| 46815 | Fort Wayne | 722 | 3.5% | $213,900 |
| 46804 | Fort Wayne | 699 | 3.4% | $263,089 |
| 46825 | Fort Wayne | 574 | 2.8% | $219,050 |
| 46845 | Fort Wayne | 559 | 2.7% | $339,800 |
| 46806 | Fort Wayne | 492 | 2.4% | $101,050 |
| 46818 | Fort Wayne | 474 | 2.3% | $269,950 |
| 46774 | New Haven | 445 | 2.2% | $192,800 |
| 46805 | Fort Wayne | 412 | 2.0% | $162,000 |
| 46808 | Fort Wayne | 408 | 2.0% | $145,400 |
Top 10 of 42 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (92%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8282 | 8.3% |
| Probate | 6220 | 11.4% |
| Partition | 2142 | 3.9% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2076 | 7.0% |
| Guardianship | 1969 | 5.5% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
The distress mix is stable across all case types. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 39.8% | 40.0% | -0.2pp |
| Probate | 29.7% | 30.1% | -0.4pp |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 13.0% | 9.9% | +3.1pp |
| Guardianship | 9.4% | 9.5% | -0.1pp |
| Partition | 7.7% | 10.5% | -2.8pp |
| Inherited Property | 0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4pp |
Distress diversity score: 2.07 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Motivation breakdown
Of 65 filings with a tagged motivation, the most common is Equity Division Sale (60.0%), followed by Inherited Property (21.5%). This motivation breakdown is captured at the court-filing stage and is not available from property-data aggregators.
| Motivation / sub-type | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Equity Division Sale | 39 | 60.0% |
| Inherited Property | 14 | 21.5% |
| High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure | 12 | 18.5% |
Based on 65 filings tagged with a motivation sub-type at the court-filing stage.
Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline
8.8% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 339 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is judgment entered (1322 cases, 73% of resolved).
| Resolution Type | Median Days | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Judgment | 323 | 429 |
| Dismissal | 478 | 63 |
| Settlement | 212 | 58 |
| Sheriff sale | 421 | 56 |
Detailed disposition breakdown
| Disposition | Count | % of Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| Final Judgment | 1322 | 72.6% |
| Court Dismissed | 264 | 14.5% |
| Settlement | 117 | 6.4% |
| Sheriff Sale | 115 | 6.3% |
| Voluntary Dismissal | 1 | 0.1% |
| Agreed Order | 1 | 0.1% |
Outcomes by Case Type
| Case Type | Cases | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Median Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8277 | 1210 | 14.6% | 340 |
| Probate | 6213 | 172 | 2.8% | 212 |
| Partition | 2142 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2076 | 307 | 14.8% | 424 |
| Guardianship | 1969 | 131 | 6.7% | 428 |
Based on 20679 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 18859 cases are still active or pending resolution.
Court Docket Activity
Across 3115 tracked cases, the average case has 31 docket entries (median 23). 72.8% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Pre-Foreclosure cases are the most court-active at 42.7 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.
| Activity level | Cases | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Early stage (1-5 events) | 91 | 2.9% |
| Mid-process (6-15 events) | 755 | 24.2% |
| Advanced (16+ events) | 2269 | 72.8% |
Docket activity by case type
| Case type | Avg. events | Cases tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Foreclosure | 42.7 | 353 |
| Divorce | 34.2 | 1389 |
| Guardianship | 34.0 | 303 |
| Probate | 23.0 | 1070 |
Based on 3115 cases with docket event tracking from Allen County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.
Procedural Stage Pipeline
Of 56 tracked cases, 23.2% reached the service-of-process stage, 71.4% progressed to a hearing. The largest procedural drop-off occurs between defendant served and response filed (69.2% of cases do not advance).
| Terminal outcome | Cases | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | 3 | 5.4% | |
| Judgment entered | 1 | 1.8% | |
| Settled | 1 | 1.8% |
Progression by case type
| Case type | Cases | Served | Hearing | Resolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 37 | 32.4% | 75.7% | 8.1% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 12 | 8.3% | 91.7% | 16.7% |
| Probate | 7 | 0.0% | 14.3% | 0.0% |
Based on 56 cases with 66 recorded stage transitions from Allen County court docket entries. Stages identified from docket events: service of process, responses, hearings, judgments, settlements, and dismissals.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $203,100. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $221,200), while Guardianship filings trend lower (median $177,300). The largest segment (53.7%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 1401 | 13.1% |
| $100K - $250K | 5759 | 53.7% |
| $250K - $500K | 3075 | 28.6% |
| $500K - $1M | 445 | 4.1% |
| Over $1M | 53 | 0.5% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $221,200 | $249,930 | 4577 |
| Probate | $192,100 | $225,805 | 3677 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $179,300 | $200,730 | 1520 |
| Guardianship | $177,300 | $198,205 | 486 |
| Partition | $208,900 | $272,505 | 471 |
Based on county assessor records for 10733 properties with court filings (51.9% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 34 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46835 (Fort Wayne) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 72/100, driven by high filing volume (870 cases). 15 of 34 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 46.
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 46835 | Fort Wayne |
72
|
870 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 46815 | Fort Wayne |
69
|
722 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 46804 | Fort Wayne |
65
|
699 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 46825 | Fort Wayne |
60
|
574 | — | 0% |
| #5 | 46845 | Fort Wayne |
59
|
559 | — | 0% |
| #6 | 46806 | Fort Wayne |
57
|
492 | — | 0% |
| #7 | 46818 | Fort Wayne |
56
|
474 | — | 0% |
| #8 | 46774 | New Haven |
55
|
445 | — | 0% |
| #9 | 46805 | Fort Wayne |
54
|
412 | — | 0% |
| #10 | 46807 | Fort Wayne |
54
|
339 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 20691 court filings across 34 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$2,504,519,842 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 10733 court-filed properties. 81% of properties with equity data carry 20%+ equity, signaling owners with real financial stakes in resolution. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($1,143,931,240 across 4577 properties).
Equity Position of Distressed Properties
Median equity position: 45.9% · Based on 43 properties with equity data
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $1,143,931,240 | 4577 | $249,930 | 88.5% |
| Probate | $830,285,119 | 3677 | $225,805 | 100.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $305,109,403 | 1520 | $200,730 | 50.0% |
| Partition | $128,349,833 | 471 | $272,505 | -- |
| Guardianship | $96,327,811 | 486 | $198,205 | -- |
Based on 10733 properties with assessor valuations (51.9% of 20691 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
20,763 court filings tracked with 1,820 resolved (8.8% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 18,943 active cases. Resolved cases take an average of 401 days. Probate cases resolve fastest (avg 316 days), while Pre-Foreclosure cases take longest (avg 474 days).
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 354 | 27 | +327 | 7.6% | |
| Feb 2020 | 324 | 53 | +271 | 16.4% | |
| Mar 2020 | 297 | 31 | +266 | 10.4% | |
| Apr 2020 | 177 | 19 | +158 | 10.7% | |
| May 2020 | 212 | 8 | +204 | 3.8% | |
| Jun 2020 | 286 | 22 | +264 | 7.7% | |
| Jul 2020 | 317 | 32 | +285 | 10.1% | |
| Aug 2020 | 287 | 36 | +251 | 12.5% | |
| Sep 2020 | 294 | 27 | +267 | 9.2% | |
| Oct 2020 | 299 | 44 | +255 | 14.7% | |
| Nov 2020 | 234 | 14 | +220 | 6.0% | |
| Dec 2020 | 267 | 19 | +248 | 7.1% | |
| Jan 2021 | 277 | 37 | +240 | 13.4% | |
| Feb 2021 | 272 | 25 | +247 | 9.2% | |
| Mar 2021 | 373 | 26 | +347 | 7.0% | |
| Apr 2021 | 275 | 22 | +253 | 8.0% | |
| May 2021 | 284 | 22 | +262 | 7.7% | |
| Jun 2021 | 311 | 31 | +280 | 10.0% | |
| Jul 2021 | 290 | 45 | +245 | 15.5% | |
| Aug 2021 | 298 | 42 | +256 | 14.1% | |
| Sep 2021 | 269 | 23 | +246 | 8.6% | |
| Oct 2021 | 280 | 30 | +250 | 10.7% | |
| Nov 2021 | 258 | 21 | +237 | 8.1% | |
| Dec 2021 | 268 | 32 | +236 | 11.9% | |
| Jan 2022 | 304 | 46 | +258 | 15.1% | |
| Feb 2022 | 313 | 39 | +274 | 12.5% | |
| Mar 2022 | 431 | 52 | +379 | 12.1% | |
| Apr 2022 | 329 | 49 | +280 | 14.9% | |
| May 2022 | 293 | 34 | +259 | 11.6% | |
| Jun 2022 | 356 | 54 | +302 | 15.2% | |
| Jul 2022 | 298 | 45 | +253 | 15.1% | |
| Aug 2022 | 334 | 52 | +282 | 15.6% | |
| Sep 2022 | 301 | 46 | +255 | 15.3% | |
| Oct 2022 | 295 | 61 | +234 | 20.7% | |
| Nov 2022 | 323 | 20 | +303 | 6.2% | |
| Dec 2022 | 268 | 32 | +236 | 11.9% | |
| Jan 2023 | 325 | 46 | +279 | 14.2% | |
| Feb 2023 | 325 | 24 | +301 | 7.4% | |
| Mar 2023 | 365 | 45 | +320 | 12.3% | |
| Apr 2023 | 292 | 31 | +261 | 10.6% | |
| May 2023 | 269 | 32 | +237 | 11.9% | |
| Jun 2023 | 299 | 21 | +278 | 7.0% | |
| Jul 2023 | 335 | 35 | +300 | 10.4% | |
| Aug 2023 | 336 | 24 | +312 | 7.1% | |
| Sep 2023 | 289 | 20 | +269 | 6.9% | |
| Oct 2023 | 319 | 49 | +270 | 15.4% | |
| Nov 2023 | 247 | 32 | +215 | 13.0% | |
| Dec 2023 | 261 | 30 | +231 | 11.5% | |
| Jan 2024 | 60 | 38 | +22 | 63.3% | |
| Feb 2024 | 310 | 1 | +309 | 0.3% | |
| Mar 2024 | 287 | 8 | +279 | 2.8% | |
| Apr 2024 | 323 | 0 | +323 | 0.0% | |
| May 2024 | 342 | 40 | +302 | 11.7% | |
| Jun 2024 | 281 | 37 | +244 | 13.2% | |
| Jul 2024 | 318 | 47 | +271 | 14.8% | |
| Aug 2024 | 341 | 31 | +310 | 9.1% | |
| Sep 2024 | 270 | 0 | +270 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2024 | 330 | 0 | +330 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2024 | 257 | 3 | +254 | 1.2% | |
| Dec 2024 | 249 | 0 | +249 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2025 | 292 | 0 | +292 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2025 | 305 | 0 | +305 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2025 | 317 | 0 | +317 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2025 | 66 | 0 | +66 | 0.0% | |
| May 2025 | 48 | 0 | +48 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2025 | 46 | 0 | +46 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2025 | 35 | 0 | +35 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2025 | 39 | 0 | +39 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2025 | 43 | 0 | +43 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2025 | 51 | 0 | +51 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2025 | 44 | 0 | +44 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2025 | 31 | 0 | +31 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2026 | 372 | 0 | +372 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2026 | 249 | 0 | +249 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2026 | 36 | 0 | +36 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2026 | 312 | 1 | +311 | 0.3% | |
| May 2026 | 252 | 3 | +249 | 1.2% | |
| Jun 2026 | 270 | 1 | +269 | 0.4% | |
| Jul 2026 | 277 | 3 | +274 | 1.1% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8311 | 1210 | 14.6% | 397 |
| Probate | 6239 | 172 | 2.8% | 316 |
| Partition | 2142 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2093 | 307 | 14.7% | 474 |
| Guardianship | 1976 | 131 | 6.6% | 459 |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 1820 resolved cases out of 20763 total filings.
Equity-Outcome Correlation
4220 properties with assessed values analyzed across equity levels. High-equity properties (20%+) represent 0.8% of filings with a 2.9% resolution rate. High (20%+) properties resolve fastest (avg 23 days) vs Unknown Equity (avg 442 days).
| Equity Level | Properties | Share | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (20%+) |
35
|
0.8% | 1 | 2.9% | 23 |
| Moderate (1-20%) |
7
|
0.2% | 1 | 14.3% | 29 |
| Unknown Equity |
4177
|
99.0% | 630 | 15.1% | 442 |
Equity Profile by Case Type
| Case Type | Properties | High Equity % | Resolution Rate | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | 1794 | 0.4% | 4.2% | 366 |
| Divorce | 1511 | 1.5% | 23.0% | 426 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 529 | 0.9% | 26.3% | 494 |
| Guardianship | 311 | 0.0% | 22.5% | 506 |
| Partition | 73 | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Equity positions derived from county assessor data (assessed values minus outstanding liens where available). Resolution outcomes classified from court docket entries. Only properties with non-zero assessed values are included in this analysis.
Property Type Distribution
85.2% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (8.2%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 8,936 | 85.2% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 865 | 8.2% | |
| Agricultural | 364 | 3.5% | |
| Residential | 303 | 2.9% | |
| Commercial | 14 | 0.1% | |
| Condo/Townhouse | 5 | 0.0% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 86.9% | 4,519 |
| Probate | Single Family | 82.5% | 3,557 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 89.1% | 1,484 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 80.2% | 475 |
| Partition | Single Family | 82.4% | 450 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 10,487 properties (50.5% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
16,975 cases (81.8%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Probate cases resolve fastest (median 211 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (median 428 days). 267 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 267 | 3 | 264 | 1.1% |
| 30-90 days | 520 | 3 | 517 | 0.6% |
| 3-6 months | 609 | 2 | 607 | 0.3% |
| 6-12 months | 580 | 0 | 580 | 0.0% |
| 1-2 years | 2,556 | 34 | 2,522 | 1.3% |
| 2+ years | 16,231 | 1,778 | 14,453 | 11.0% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 8,311 | 1210 | 14.6% | 340d |
| Probate | 6,239 | 172 | 2.8% | 211d |
| Partition | 2,142 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 2,093 | 307 | 14.7% | 424d |
| Guardianship | 1,976 | 131 | 6.6% | 428d |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
773 filings (3.7% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (33%). Newer properties (2000+) average $349,794 — 2.1x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($166,579).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 252 | 32.6% | $166,579 | — |
| 1960–1979 | 196 | 25.4% | $226,058 | — |
| 1980–1999 | 147 | 19.0% | $326,931 | — |
| 2000+ | 178 | 23.0% | $349,794 | 127d |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $349,794 — 2.1x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($166,579).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Municipality filing concentration in Allen County
Court filings in Allen County span 155 municipalities. Fort Wayne leads with 7230 filings (81.3% of total), predominantly Divorce (44.0%). Filing activity is geographically concentrated — the top 3 municipalities account for 89% of all filings.
| Municipality | Filings | Share | Top case type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Wayne | 7230 | 81.3% | Divorce (44.0%) |
| New Haven | 443 | 5.0% | Divorce (40.4%) |
| Huntertown | 208 | 2.3% | Divorce (52.4%) |
| Monroeville | 144 | 1.6% | Probate (46.5%) |
| Woodburn | 107 | 1.2% | Divorce (42.1%) |
| Leo | 105 | 1.2% | Divorce (35.2%) |
| Roanoke | 102 | 1.1% | Probate (43.1%) |
| Yoder | 81 | 0.9% | Probate (53.1%) |
| Hoagland | 69 | 0.8% | Probate (46.4%) |
| Grabill | 61 | 0.7% | Probate (36.1%) |
| Harlan | 39 | 0.4% | Divorce (43.6%) |
| Churubusco | 39 | 0.4% | Divorce (46.2%) |
| Spencerville | 26 | 0.3% | Probate (30.8%) |
| Ossian | 15 | 0.2% | Probate (53.3%) |
| Auburn | 12 | 0.1% | Divorce (41.7%) |
Top 15 of 155 municipalities with court filings. Data from 8,896 filings (43% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 15 comparable quarters show 13,280 tracked filings in Allen County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 834) was rising vs prior (2026 Q1: 657, +26.9%).
| Quarter | Total | Divorce | Probate | Pre-Foreclosure | Partition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 1048 | 370 (35.3%) | 358 (34.2%) | 146 (13.9%) | 90 (8.6%) |
| 2022 Q2 | 978 | 392 (40.1%) | 298 (30.5%) | 118 (12.1%) | 77 (7.9%) |
| 2022 Q3 | 933 | 404 (43.3%) | 255 (27.3%) | 100 (10.7%) | 85 (9.1%) |
| 2022 Q4 | 886 | 315 (35.6%) | 285 (32.2%) | 100 (11.3%) | 101 (11.4%) |
| 2023 Q1 | 1015 | 379 (37.3%) | 304 (30.0%) | 135 (13.3%) | 102 (10.0%) |
| 2023 Q2 | 860 | 342 (39.8%) | 254 (29.5%) | 65 (7.6%) | 100 (11.6%) |
| 2023 Q3 | 960 | 385 (40.1%) | 250 (26.0%) | 104 (10.8%) | 116 (12.1%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 827 | 320 (38.7%) | 243 (29.4%) | 113 (13.7%) | 95 (11.5%) |
| 2024 Q1 | 657 | 275 (41.9%) | 202 (30.7%) | 63 (9.6%) | 58 (8.8%) |
| 2024 Q2 | 946 | 394 (41.6%) | 246 (26.0%) | 111 (11.7%) | 100 (10.6%) |
| 2024 Q3 | 929 | 426 (45.9%) | 222 (23.9%) | 111 (11.9%) | 88 (9.5%) |
| 2024 Q4 | 836 | 301 (36.0%) | 237 (28.3%) | 105 (12.6%) | 98 (11.7%) |
| 2025 Q1 | 914 | 345 (37.7%) | 271 (29.6%) | 153 (16.7%) | 76 (8.3%) |
| 2026 Q1 | 657 | 225 (34.2%) | 197 (30.0%) | 108 (16.4%) | 42 (6.4%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 834 | 315 (37.8%) | 249 (29.9%) | 105 (12.6%) | 69 (8.3%) |
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $166,450, with the largest concentration (21.8%) in the $200K–$300K range. Divorce filings have the highest median value ($183,500) while Guardianship filings are lowest ($135,400).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 493 | 11.7% | |
| $50K–$100K | 558 | 13.2% | |
| $100K–$150K | 776 | 18.4% | |
| $150K–$200K | 806 | 19.1% | |
| $200K–$300K | 920 | 21.8% | |
| $300K–$500K | 514 | 12.2% | |
| $500K+ | 153 | 3.6% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | $163,550 | $230,774 | 1,794 |
| Divorce | $183,500 | $228,619 | 1,511 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $154,300 | $165,120 | 529 |
| Guardianship | $135,400 | $211,192 | 311 |
| Partition | $144,800 | $187,330 | 73 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 4,220 properties (20.3% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 6.6 years, with 35.9% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Probate cases show the longest tenure (10.9 yr median) vs. Divorce (5.2 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 958 | 16.4% | |
| 2–5 years | 1,369 | 23.5% | |
| 5–10 years | 1,412 | 24.2% | |
| 10–20 years | 1,321 | 22.6% | |
| 20+ years | 775 | 13.3% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5.2 yr | 7.5 yr | 2,654 |
| Probate | 10.9 yr | 12.9 yr | 1,468 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 7.2 yr | 9.5 yr | 1,082 |
| Guardianship | 6.8 yr | 9.7 yr | 343 |
| Partition | 6.4 yr | 8.5 yr | 286 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 5,835 properties (28.1% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Allen County
Of 17,638 unique property owners in court filings, 1,414 (8.0%) appear in multiple cases, including 464 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 68 cases spanning 75 months. Divorce cases have the highest repeat rate at 14.2%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 967 | 6813 | 14.2% |
| Probate | 757 | 5568 | 13.6% |
| Partition | 50 | 2086 | 2.4% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 55 | 2048 | 2.7% |
| Guardianship | 239 | 1775 | 13.5% |
Analysis based on 17,638 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Serial distressed properties in Allen County
Of 9,910 unique properties in court filings, 858 (8.7%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.2 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 15 months. Partition properties have the highest repeat rate at 22.1%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 457 | 4418 | 10.3% |
| Probate | 329 | 3569 | 9.2% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 296 | 1417 | 20.9% |
| Guardianship | 92 | 463 | 19.9% |
| Partition | 101 | 458 | 22.1% |
Analysis based on 9,910 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 10,404 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 14.6% (median land value $28,900, median improvement value $174,400). 108 properties (1.0%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Probate cases skew most land-heavy (median 15.2%) while Partition skews most improvement-heavy (14.0%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 1,611 | 15.5% |
| 10–20% | 6,913 | 66.4% |
| 20–30% | 1,504 | 14.5% |
| 30–50% | 268 | 2.6% |
| 50–70% | 65 | 0.6% |
| Over 70% | 43 | 0.4% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 4,457 | 14.4% |
| Probate | 3,542 | 15.2% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 1,489 | 14.4% |
| Guardianship | 461 | 14.6% |
| Partition | 453 | 14.0% |
Analysis of 10,404 properties (50.1% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Prior sale value trajectory
Across 1,310 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -5.5%. 747 properties (57.0%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -10.1% value change vs +92.7% for long-hold (10+ yr). Guardianship cases have the highest underwater rate (62.4%) while Pre-Foreclosure has the lowest (47.6%).
Value change distribution
| Value change bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 50%+ loss | 163 | 12.4% |
| 20–50% loss | 291 | 22.2% |
| 0–20% loss | 293 | 22.4% |
| 0–20% gain | 140 | 10.7% |
| 20–50% gain | 99 | 7.6% |
| 50–100% gain | 130 | 9.9% |
| 100%+ gain | 194 | 14.8% |
Holding period vs value change
(334 properties)
(211 properties)
Value trajectory by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median change | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 532 | -5.0% | 56.6% |
| Probate | 416 | -11.5% | 62.0% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 250 | +1.5% | 47.6% |
| Guardianship | 85 | -18.2% | 62.4% |
| Partition | 27 | -16.3% | 59.3% |
Analysis of 1,310 properties (6.3% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Allen County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (51% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-31 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Allen County
Where filings concentrate inside Allen County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Fort Wayne | 7048 | 82.9% |
| New Haven | 446 | 5.2% |
| Huntertown | 207 | 2.4% |
| Monroeville | 143 | 1.7% |
| Leo | 106 | 1.2% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Allen County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying Allen County filings
Subscribe to Allen County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Allen County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Allen County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-31, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/allen-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)