HomeReports › Porter County, Indiana

Porter County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence

Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Porter County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-16. See methodology.

Data current as of 2026-07-14 · refreshes nightly #6 of 23 Indiana counties we cover by filing volume
Investor takeaway

About Porter County

Porter County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. As of 2020, the population was 173,215, making it the 10th most populous county in Indiana. The county seat is Valparaiso. The county is part of Northwest Indiana, as well as the Chicago metropolitan area. Porter County is the site of much of the Indiana Dunes, an area of ecological significance. The Hour Glass Museum in Ogden Dunes documents the region's ecological significance.

Source: Wikipedia

At a glance

8718 verified property-related court filings tracked across 73 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).

121 typical monthly filing volume.

#6 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.

1% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (128 of 8718 filings).

$271,640 median estimated property value across the 349 filings with property-enrichment data (4% coverage).

3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.

Filing type breakdown

Filing typeFilingsShare
Divorce 3629 41.6%
Probate 2104 24.1%
Pre-Foreclosure 1134 13.0%
Guardianship 1031 11.8%
Partition 818 9.4%
Inherited Property 2 0.0%

Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.

Get the full Porter County lead list

Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.

Start Free Trial

Monthly filing activity

MonthFilingsvs prior
Jan 2020 147
Feb 2020 136 -11
Mar 2020 148 +12
Apr 2020 86 -62
May 2020 107 +21
Jun 2020 130 +23
Jul 2020 116 -14
Aug 2020 108 -8
Sep 2020 122 +14
Oct 2020 136 +14
Nov 2020 89 -47
Dec 2020 103 +14
Jan 2021 110 +7
Feb 2021 108 -2
Mar 2021 146 +38
Apr 2021 121 -25
May 2021 115 -6
Jun 2021 135 +20
Jul 2021 110 -25
Aug 2021 119 +9
Sep 2021 127 +8
Oct 2021 131 +4
Nov 2021 119 -12
Dec 2021 115 -4
Jan 2022 133 +18
Feb 2022 126 -7
Mar 2022 160 +34
Apr 2022 157 -3
May 2022 147 -10
Jun 2022 121 -26
Jul 2022 125 +4
Aug 2022 164 +39
Sep 2022 151 -13
Oct 2022 140 -11
Nov 2022 115 -25
Dec 2022 97 -18
Jan 2023 151 +54
Feb 2023 116 -35
Mar 2023 148 +32
Apr 2023 127 -21
May 2023 139 +12
Jun 2023 107 -32
Jul 2023 102 -5
Aug 2023 145 +43
Sep 2023 114 -31
Oct 2023 118 +4
Nov 2023 106 -12
Dec 2023 99 -7
May 2024 115 +16
Jun 2024 54 -61
Jul 2024 61 +7
Sep 2024 108 +47
Oct 2024 72 -36
Nov 2024 94 +22
Dec 2024 113 +19
Jan 2025 127 +14
Feb 2025 67 -60
Mar 2025 133 +66
Apr 2025 143 +10
May 2025 109 -34
Jun 2025 142 +33
Aug 2025 117 -25
Sep 2025 98 -19
Oct 2025 130 +32
Nov 2025 98 -32
Dec 2025 105 +7
Jan 2026 115 +10
Feb 2026 142 +27
Mar 2026 146 +4
Apr 2026 147 +1
May 2026 121 -26
Jun 2026 136 +15
Jul 2026 33 -103

Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.

Geographic concentration by ZIP

Top 10 ZIPs in Porter County account for 2.9% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.

ZIPCityFilingsShare
46368 Portage 66 0.8%
46385 Valparaiso 61 0.7%
46304 Chesterton 61 0.7%
46383 Valparaiso 28 0.3%
46341 Hebron 13 0.1%
46347 Kouts 10 0.1%
46360 Michigan City 5 0.1%
46342 Hobart 3 0.0%
46307 Crown Point 2 0.0%
46393 Wheeler 1 0.0%

Based on filings with a parseable property address (3% of Porter County filings).

Target these ZIP codes before your competitors

Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.

See Availability

Property value distribution

Estimated valueFilingsShare
Under $75k 7 2.0%
$75k - $150k 26 7.4%
$150k - $250k 112 32.1%
$250k - $400k 122 35.0%
$400k+ 82 23.5%

Source: third-party property enrichment (4% coverage on Porter County filings). Median $271,640; mean $319,525.

These properties are in your market right now

Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Porter County. One subscriber per county.

Check Availability

Day-of-week filing pattern

DayFilingsShare
Sun 64 0.7%
Mon 1728 19.8%
Tue 1885 21.6%
Wed 1694 19.4%
Thu 1645 18.9%
Fri 1642 18.8%
Sat 60 0.7%

Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 8718 filings with a parseable date.

Building characteristics

Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 325 filings with characteristic data:

IndicatorValue
Median year built1979
Median living area1,832 sqft
Median lot size1275.0 acres
Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment)0.0%

Housing stock + distress signals

Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 72102 Porter County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.

Indicator Porter County US average
Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale)5.6%10.5%
Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage67.4%60.8%
Pre-1940 housing stock8.6%12.3%
Single-family detached share of housing stock74.8%61.2%
Residents age 65 or older17.7%17.3%

Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.

Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)

HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Porter County sits within the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN (FY 2026). Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.

Unit size Fair market rent / month
Efficiency / studio$959
1-bedroom$1,082
2-bedroom$1,317
3-bedroom$1,612
4-bedroom$1,744

Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (2026). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.

New construction (market momentum)

Annual building permits filed in Porter County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.

Indicator Value
Total housing units permitted (2025)564
Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025)+1.4%
Single-family share of permits (2025)100.0%
Single-family units permitted564
Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building)0

Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.

Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency

Porter County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.

IndicatorValuePeriod
Indiana home price index (year-over-year)+4.3%2026-01-01
Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020)+64.9%2026-01-01
National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family)1.89%2026-01-01

Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.

Local-market benchmark

Demographics of the ZIPs where filings cluster, weighted by filing count and benchmarked against Census ACS 2023 5-year:

IndicatorFiling-weighted average
Median household income (where filings cluster)$84,721
Median home value$259,145
Owner-occupancy rate77.8%
Renter share of households22.2%
Median gross rent$1,138/mo

Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year estimates, weighted by Keystone's filing volume across 9 top ZIPs.

Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Porter County

Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").

PlaintiffForeclosure filings
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC 2
ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC S/B/M NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 1
JAK ENTERPRISE, LLC D/B/A KORNACKI ROOFING AND CONTRACTING 1
SERVIS ONE, INC 1
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC 1
US #1364 FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1
REGIONAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. 1
NEWREZ LLC 1
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 1

Source: plaintiff names extracted from Porter County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.

Post-filing sale outcomes in Porter County

What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 377 filings (4.3% of all 8718 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.

2.4%
of tracked properties sold post-filing
119
median days from filing to sale
$311,216
median post-filing sale price
1.03x
sale price vs. assessed value

Time from filing to sale

How quickly do distressed properties sell after a court filing is recorded? This distribution shows where post-filing sales cluster.

Timeframe Sales Share
Under 30 days 1 11.1%
31–90 days 2 22.2%
91–180 days 3 33.3%
181–365 days 2 22.2%
Over 1 year 1 11.1%

Sale rates by filing type

Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.

Filing type Tracked Sold Sale rate
Guardianship 21 1 4.8%
Divorce 188 6 3.2%
Pre-Foreclosure 78 2 2.6%
Probate 88 0 0.0%

How sales relate to the filing

Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 66.7% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.

Attribution Meaning Sales Share
Filing-driven Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) 6 66.7%
Concurrent Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal 2 22.2%
Pre-existing Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded 1 11.1%

Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 377 of 8718 filings (4.3% parcel coverage). Timing based on 9 sales with valid filing and sale dates. Prices based on 5 sales with recorded sale amounts.

Be the first investor to reach these owners

Porter County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.

Start Free Trial

FEMA flood zone exposure

Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 427 properties with geocoded locations.

0.7%
in Special Flood Hazard Area
3
properties in high-risk zones
Zone Properties Share
X 411 96.3%
X-500yr 13 3.0%
VE 2 0.5%
A 1 0.2%

Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 427 properties checked.

Filing velocity by case type

How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.

Case type Total Share Trend
Divorce 3629 41.6% +0.6%
Probate 2104 24.1% +11.5%
Pre-Foreclosure 1134 13.0% +5.3%
Guardianship 1031 11.8% -10.5%
Partition 818 9.4% -27.3%

Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.

Lender concentration analysis

Foreclosure activity is spread across many lenders, suggesting diverse distress sources rather than a single institutional wave.

748
HHI score
Competitive
Market type
31.6%
Top 3 share
Lender / Plaintiff Filings Share
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC 3 15.8%
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC 2 10.5%
ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC S/B/M NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 1 5.3%
JAK ENTERPRISE LLC 1 5.3%
SERVIS ONE INC 1 5.3%

HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index): <1500 = competitive, 1500-2500 = moderate concentration, >2500 = highly concentrated. Based on 19 foreclosure filings with identified plaintiffs.

Seasonal filing patterns

Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Jul. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.

Month Avg filings Relative
Jan 130.5
89%
Feb 115.8
79%
Mar 146.8
100%
Apr 130.2
89%
May 121.9
83%
Jun 117.9
80%
Jul 102.8
70%
Aug 130.6
89%
Sep 120
82%
Oct 121.2
83%
Nov 103.5
71%
Dec 105.3
72%

Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.4x peak-to-trough ratio.

ZIP code distress hotspots

Distress is geographically dispersed across 11 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating. 1 of the top hotspots have high-equity properties (>40% equity), signaling potential value-add or wholesale opportunities.

ZIP Area Filings Share High equity Median value
46368 Portage 66 0.8% 11% $271,640
46385 Valparaiso 61 0.7% 21% $312,721
46304 Chesterton 61 0.7% 15% $282,700
46383 Valparaiso 28 0.3% 14% $310,750
46341 Hebron 13 0.1% 8% $285,300
46347 Kouts 10 0.1% 20% $303,772
46360 Michigan City 5 0.1% 0% $183,050
46342 Hobart 3 0.0% 0% $355,600
46307 Crown Point 2 0.0% 150% $529,170
46393 Wheeler 1 0.0% 0% $112,300

Top 10 of 11 ZIP codes with filings. High equity = properties with estimated equity above 40% (from third-party enrichment).

Non-resident owner analysis

Most filings (98%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.

1.5%
Non-resident owners
Case type Total filings Non-resident %
Divorce 3629 2.1%
Probate 2104 1.7%
Pre-Foreclosure 1134 0.9%
Guardianship 1031 0.6%
Partition 818 0.0%

Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.

Target absentee and distressed owners directly

Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.

Claim Porter County

Distress composition and shifts

Pre-Foreclosure share is rising. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.

Case type Recent share Earlier share Shift
Divorce 37.0% 41.7% -4.7pp
Probate 23.7% 24.1% -0.4pp
Pre-Foreclosure 20.6% 12.8% +7.8pp (rising)
Guardianship 9.3% 11.9% -2.6pp
Partition 8.6% 9.4% -0.8pp
Inherited Property 0.8% 0.0% +0.8pp

Distress diversity score: 2.17 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.

Motivation breakdown

Of 52 filings with a tagged motivation, the most common is Equity Division Sale (51.9%), followed by High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure (26.9%). This motivation breakdown is captured at the court-filing stage and is not available from property-data aggregators.

Motivation / sub-type Filings Share
Equity Division Sale 27 51.9%
High Urgency Pre-Foreclosure 14 26.9%
Inherited Property 11 21.2%

Based on 52 filings tagged with a motivation sub-type at the court-filing stage.

Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline

0.0% of tracked cases have reached a resolution. The most common resolution is dismissed (2 cases, 50% of resolved).

1
Judgment entered
0.0% of 8712 tracked
2
Dismissed
0.0% of 8712 tracked
1
Settled / agreed resolution
0.0% of 8712 tracked
Detailed disposition breakdown
Disposition Count % of Resolved
Court Dismissed 2 50.0%
Final Judgment 1 25.0%
Settlement 1 25.0%

Outcomes by Case Type

Case Type Cases Resolved Resolution Rate Median Days
Divorce 3627 1 0.0%
Probate 2102 0 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 1132 3 0.3% 48
Guardianship 1031 0 0.0%
Partition 818 0 0.0%

Based on 8712 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 8708 cases are still active or pending resolution.

Court Docket Activity

Across 67 tracked cases, the average case has 16 docket entries (median 16). 52.2% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Probate cases are the most court-active at 16.5 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.

15.7
Avg. docket entries per case
16
Median entries per case
32
Most active case
Activity level Cases Share
Early stage (1-5 events) 1 1.5%
Mid-process (6-15 events) 31 46.3%
Advanced (16+ events) 35 52.2%
Docket activity by case type
Case type Avg. events Cases tracked
Probate 16.5 21
Pre-Foreclosure 16.1 15
Divorce 15.0 31

Based on 67 cases with docket event tracking from Porter County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.

Procedural Stage Pipeline

Of 63 tracked cases, 20.6% reached the service-of-process stage, 42.9% progressed to a hearing. The largest procedural drop-off occurs between response filed and hearing scheduled (6.9% of cases do not advance).

Case progression funnel
All tracked cases
63
Defendant served
13 (20.6%)
Response filed
29 (46.0%)
Hearing scheduled
27 (42.9%)
Terminal outcome Cases Share
Dismissed 2 3.2%
Settled 1 1.6%
Default judgment 1 1.6%
Largest procedural drop-off
Response filed → Hearing scheduled: 2 of 29 cases (6.9%) do not advance to the next stage.
Progression by case type
Case type Cases Served Hearing Resolved
Divorce 36 13.9% 47.2% 2.8%
Pre-Foreclosure 17 47.1% 5.9% 17.6%
Probate 9 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%

Based on 63 cases with 73 recorded stage transitions from Porter County court docket entries. Stages identified from docket events: service of process, responses, hearings, judgments, settlements, and dismissals.

Property Value Profile

The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $265,900. Guardianship filings involve the highest-value properties (median $363,900), while Pre-Foreclosure filings trend lower (median $232,400). The largest segment (45.3%) falls in the $250K - $500K range.

$265,900
Median assessed value
$302,934
Average assessed value
369
Properties with values
Value range Properties Share
Under $100K 32 8.7%
$100K - $250K 133 36.0%
$250K - $500K 167 45.3%
$500K - $1M 32 8.7%
Over $1M 5 1.4%
Value breakdown by case type
Case type Median value Avg value Properties
Divorce $299,499 $326,160 182
Probate $262,600 $284,453 87
Pre-Foreclosure $232,400 $252,605 77
Guardianship $363,900 $364,959 21

Based on county assessor records for 369 properties with court filings (4.2% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.

Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code

Across 8 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46368 (Portage) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (66 cases). 4 of 8 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 51.

75/100
Highest ZIP score
8
ZIPs scored
51
Average score
Rank ZIP Code Area Score Filings Avg Value Absentee %
#1 46368 Portage
75
66 0%
#2 46385 Valparaiso
72
61 0%
#3 46304 Chesterton
72
61 0%
#4 46383 Valparaiso
54
28 0%
#5 46341 Hebron
38
13 0%
#6 46347 Kouts
36
10 0%
#7 46360 Michigan City
34
5 0%
#8 46342 Hobart
25
3 0%
How the score is calculated

The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:

  • Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
  • Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
  • Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
  • Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set

Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.

Based on 8718 court filings across 8 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.

Distress Capital Analysis

$111,782,484 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 369 court-filed properties. 87% of properties with equity data carry 20%+ equity, signaling owners with real financial stakes in resolution. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($59,361,068 across 182 properties). 26 high-equity distressed properties ($10,704,406 total) represent the highest-value investor targets.

$112M
Total Value at Risk
369
Properties Valued
$265,900
Median Value

Equity Position of Distressed Properties

High (20%+)
26 (86.7%)
Moderate (1-20%)
3 (10.0%)
Low/Underwater (≤0%)
1 (3.3%)

Median equity position: 40.9% · Based on 30 properties with equity data

Capital at Risk by Filing Type

Filing Type Total Value Properties Avg Value High Equity %
Divorce
$59,361,068
182 $326,160 81.2%
Probate
$24,747,395
87 $284,453 100.0%
Pre-Foreclosure
$19,450,581
77 $252,605 100.0%
Guardianship
$7,664,140
21 $364,959 --
High-Equity Distressed Properties
26 properties with 20%+ equity totaling $10,704,406 in assessed value (7.0% of all valued filings). Average property value: $411,708. These represent the highest-value investor targets — owners with real money at stake who are most likely to negotiate.

Based on 369 properties with assessor valuations (4.2% of 8718 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.

Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis

8,784 court filings tracked with 4 resolved (0.0% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 8,780 active cases. Resolved cases take an average of 41 days. Divorce cases resolve fastest (avg 23 days), while Pre-Foreclosure cases take longest (avg 47 days).

0.0%
Absorption Rate
8,780
Active Case Backlog
41
Avg Days to Resolve
Month New Filings Resolved Net Inflow Absorption
Jan 2020 147 0 +147
0.0%
Feb 2020 136 0 +136
0.0%
Mar 2020 148 0 +148
0.0%
Apr 2020 86 0 +86
0.0%
May 2020 107 0 +107
0.0%
Jun 2020 130 0 +130
0.0%
Jul 2020 116 0 +116
0.0%
Aug 2020 108 0 +108
0.0%
Sep 2020 122 0 +122
0.0%
Oct 2020 136 0 +136
0.0%
Nov 2020 89 0 +89
0.0%
Dec 2020 103 0 +103
0.0%
Jan 2021 110 0 +110
0.0%
Feb 2021 108 0 +108
0.0%
Mar 2021 146 0 +146
0.0%
Apr 2021 121 0 +121
0.0%
May 2021 115 0 +115
0.0%
Jun 2021 135 0 +135
0.0%
Jul 2021 110 0 +110
0.0%
Aug 2021 119 0 +119
0.0%
Sep 2021 127 0 +127
0.0%
Oct 2021 131 0 +131
0.0%
Nov 2021 119 0 +119
0.0%
Dec 2021 115 0 +115
0.0%
Jan 2022 133 0 +133
0.0%
Feb 2022 126 0 +126
0.0%
Mar 2022 160 0 +160
0.0%
Apr 2022 157 0 +157
0.0%
May 2022 147 0 +147
0.0%
Jun 2022 121 0 +121
0.0%
Jul 2022 125 0 +125
0.0%
Aug 2022 164 0 +164
0.0%
Sep 2022 151 0 +151
0.0%
Oct 2022 140 0 +140
0.0%
Nov 2022 115 0 +115
0.0%
Dec 2022 97 0 +97
0.0%
Jan 2023 151 0 +151
0.0%
Feb 2023 116 0 +116
0.0%
Mar 2023 148 0 +148
0.0%
Apr 2023 127 0 +127
0.0%
May 2023 139 0 +139
0.0%
Jun 2023 107 0 +107
0.0%
Jul 2023 102 0 +102
0.0%
Aug 2023 145 0 +145
0.0%
Sep 2023 114 0 +114
0.0%
Oct 2023 118 0 +118
0.0%
Nov 2023 106 0 +106
0.0%
Dec 2023 99 0 +99
0.0%
May 2024 115 0 +115
0.0%
Jun 2024 54 0 +54
0.0%
Jul 2024 61 0 +61
0.0%
Sep 2024 108 0 +108
0.0%
Oct 2024 72 0 +72
0.0%
Nov 2024 94 0 +94
0.0%
Dec 2024 113 0 +113
0.0%
Jan 2025 127 0 +127
0.0%
Feb 2025 67 0 +67
0.0%
Mar 2025 133 0 +133
0.0%
Apr 2025 143 0 +143
0.0%
May 2025 109 0 +109
0.0%
Jun 2025 142 0 +142
0.0%
Aug 2025 117 0 +117
0.0%
Sep 2025 98 0 +98
0.0%
Oct 2025 130 0 +130
0.0%
Nov 2025 98 0 +98
0.0%
Dec 2025 105 0 +105
0.0%
Jan 2026 181 0 +181
0.0%
Feb 2026 142 0 +142
0.0%
Mar 2026 146 0 +146
0.0%
Apr 2026 147 2 +145
1.4%
May 2026 121 2 +119
1.7%
Jun 2026 136 0 +136
0.0%
Jul 2026 33 0 +33
0.0%

Resolution by Case Type

Case Type Filed Resolved Absorption Avg Days
Divorce 3663 1 0.0% 23
Probate 2119 0 0.0% n/a
Pre-Foreclosure 1149 3 0.3% 47
Guardianship 1033 0 0.0% n/a
Partition 818 0 0.0% n/a
Resolution Speed Comparison
Divorce cases resolve fastest at an average of 23 days, while Pre-Foreclosure cases take the longest at 47 days. This gap reflects the different legal processes and court scheduling for each case type.

Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 4 resolved cases out of 8784 total filings.

Equity-Outcome Correlation

374 properties with assessed values analyzed across equity levels. High-equity properties (20%+) represent 3.5% of filings with a 7.7% resolution rate. High (20%+) properties resolve fastest (avg 23 days) vs Unknown Equity (avg 47 days).

374
Properties Analyzed
4
With Outcomes
23
Fastest Avg Days
Equity Level Properties Share Resolved Resolution Rate Avg Days
High (20%+)
13
3.5% 1 7.7% 23
Unknown Equity
359
96.0% 3 0.8% 47

Equity Profile by Case Type

Case Type Properties High Equity % Resolution Rate Avg Days
Divorce 188 2.1% 0.5% 23
Probate 85 2.4% 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 78 9.0% 3.8% 47
Guardianship 21 0.0% 0.0%
13 high-equity distressed properties tracked
Properties with 20%+ equity make up 3.5% of valued filings with a 7.7% resolution rate.

Equity positions derived from county assessor data (assessed values minus outstanding liens where available). Resolution outcomes classified from court docket entries. Only properties with non-zero assessed values are included in this analysis.

Property Type Distribution

74.1% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Residential (11.4%).

Single Family
Most common (74.1%)
359
Properties classified
6
Property categories
Property type Count Share Distribution
Single Family 266 74.1%
Residential 41 11.4%
Duplex/Multi-Family 31 8.6%
Agricultural 7 1.9%
Commercial 7 1.9%
Industrial 7 1.9%
Property type by case type
Case type Dominant property type Share Properties
Divorce Single Family 71.8% 181
Probate Single Family 72.0% 82
Pre-Foreclosure Single Family 79.7% 74
Guardianship Single Family 85.0% 20

Property classifications from county assessor records for 359 properties (4.1% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.

Case Aging & Stall Analysis

7,330 cases (83.4%) have been active for over a year without resolution. 104 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.

7,330
Cases stalled 1yr+
83.4%
of all filings
8,784
Total tracked
Age Total Resolved Still active Resolution rate
<30 days 104 0 104 0.0%
30-90 days 248 4 244 1.6%
3-6 months 456 0 456 0.0%
6-12 months 646 0 646 0.0%
1-2 years 1,142 0 1,142 0.0%
2+ years 6,188 0 6,188 0.0%
Resolution speed by case type
Case type Total Resolved Rate Median days
Divorce 3,663 1 0.0%
Probate 2,119 0 0.0%
Pre-Foreclosure 1,149 3 0.3% 48d
Guardianship 1,033 0 0.0%
Partition 818 0 0.0%

Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.

Property Age & Distress Profile

351 filings (4.0% of scope) have year-built data. 1960–1979 properties are most common (33%). Newer properties (2000+) average $424,825 — 2.0x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($207,309).

351
Properties with year built
4.0%
Coverage
1960–1979
Most common era (32.8%)
Construction era Filings Share Avg value Median days
Pre-1960 69 19.7% $207,309
1960–1979 115 32.8% $238,862
1980–1999 71 20.2% $336,900
2000+ 96 27.4% $424,825

Value trend: 2000+ properties average $424,825 — 2.05x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($207,309).

Top case types by construction era
Pre-1960: Divorce (55.1%), Pre-Foreclosure (20.3%), Probate (20.3%), Guardianship (2.9%)
1960–1979: Divorce (37.4%), Pre-Foreclosure (30.4%), Probate (27.0%), Guardianship (4.3%)
1980–1999: Divorce (43.7%), Pre-Foreclosure (23.9%), Probate (22.5%), Guardianship (9.9%)
2000+: Divorce (67.7%), Probate (16.7%), Pre-Foreclosure (8.3%), Guardianship (7.3%)

Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.

Property Value Distribution

The median property value in distressed filings is $252,300, with the largest concentration (30.2%) in the $300K–$500K range. Guardianship filings have the highest median value ($363,900) while Probate filings are lowest ($224,900).

$252,300
Median value
$287,939
Average value
374
Properties valued
Price range Count Share Distribution
Under $50K 25 6.7%
$50K–$100K 15 4.0%
$100K–$150K 23 6.1%
$150K–$200K 53 14.2%
$200K–$300K 112 29.9%
$300K–$500K 113 30.2%
$500K+ 33 8.8%
Value by case type
Case type Median value Average value Properties
Divorce $270,050 $308,259 188
Probate $224,900 $260,492 85
Pre-Foreclosure $226,700 $249,143 78
Guardianship $363,900 $362,014 21

Assessed property values from county assessor records for 374 properties (4.3% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.

Ownership Duration Before Filing

The median ownership duration before a court filing is 7.0 years, with 35.3% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Guardianship cases show the longest tenure (9.3 yr median) vs. Divorce (6.5 yr).

7.0 yr
Median tenure
9.1 yr
Average tenure
278
Properties tracked
Ownership period Count Share Distribution
Under 2 years 33 11.9%
2–5 years 68 24.5%
5–10 years 79 28.4%
10–20 years 70 25.2%
20+ years 28 10.1%
Tenure by case type
Case type Median tenure Average tenure Properties
Divorce 6.5 yr 8.4 yr 148
Pre-Foreclosure 6.8 yr 9.4 yr 61
Probate 8.5 yr 10.3 yr 51
Guardianship 9.3 yr 9.7 yr 18

Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 278 properties (3.2% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.

Repeat litigation patterns in Porter County

Of 7,363 unique property owners in court filings, 806 (10.9%) appear in multiple cases, including 218 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 26 cases spanning 70 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 27.1%.

7,363
Unique owners
806
Repeat filers (2+ cases)
10.9%
Repeat rate
218
Serial filers (3+ cases)

Repeat rate by case type

Case type Repeat owners Total owners Repeat rate
Divorce 542 2957 18.3%
Probate 336 1935 17.4%
Pre-Foreclosure 29 1120 2.6%
Guardianship 240 885 27.1%
Partition 7 812 0.9%

Analysis based on 7,363 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.

Serial distressed properties in Porter County

Of 355 unique properties in court filings, 16 (4.5%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.6 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 5 months. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 26.3%.

355
Unique properties
16
Repeat-filing properties
4.5%
Serial distress rate
5 mo
Avg time between filings

Serial distress rate by case type

Case type Serial properties Total properties Serial rate
Divorce 13 183 7.1%
Probate 5 86 5.8%
Pre-Foreclosure 6 78 7.7%
Guardianship 5 19 26.3%

Analysis based on 355 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.

Land vs improvement value composition

Across 354 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 15.7% (median land value $42,300, median improvement value $225,600). 8 properties (2.3%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Probate cases skew most land-heavy (median 17.2%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (15.0%).

15.7%
Median land share
$42,300
Median land value
$225,600
Median improvement value
2.3%
Land-dominant (50%+)

Land share distribution

Land share bracket Properties % of total
Under 10% 22 6.2%
10–20% 249 70.3%
20–30% 56 15.8%
30–50% 19 5.4%
50–70% 3 0.8%
Over 70% 5 1.4%

Land share by case type

Case type Filings Median land %
Divorce 179 15.6%
Probate 77 17.2%
Pre-Foreclosure 75 15.0%
Guardianship 21 15.3%

Analysis of 354 properties (4.0% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.

Prior sale value trajectory

Across 262 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is +30.0%. 78 properties (29.8%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -7.4% value change vs +77.2% for long-hold (10+ yr). Divorce cases have the highest underwater rate (33.1%) while Guardianship has the lowest (23.5%).

+30.0%
Median value change
$223,950
Median purchase price
$262,850
Median assessed value
29.8%
Underwater properties

Value change distribution

Value change bracket Properties % of total
50%+ loss 7 2.7%
20–50% loss 30 11.5%
0–20% loss 41 15.6%
0–20% gain 32 12.2%
20–50% gain 53 20.2%
50–100% gain 64 24.4%
100%+ gain 35 13.4%

Holding period vs value change

-7.4%
Short hold (<5 yr) median change
(100 properties)
+77.2%
Long hold (10+ yr) median change
(81 properties)

Value trajectory by case type

Case type Filings Median change Underwater
Divorce 145 +29.2% 33.1%
Pre-Foreclosure 54 +30.0% 25.9%
Probate 46 +34.3% 26.1%
Guardianship 17 +56.1% 23.5%

Analysis of 262 properties (3.0% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.

Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites

The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.

Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.

Methodology and data sources

Top cities for filings within Porter County

Where filings concentrate inside Porter County, by parsed property city or township.

City / Township Filings Share (of city-parsed filings)
Valparaiso8935.5%
Portage6626.3%
Chesterton4417.5%
Porter145.6%
Hebron135.2%

Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Porter County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.

Related Indiana guides

Indiana foreclosure process How to find leads in Indiana Top foreclosure counties in Indiana Indiana statewide analysis

Get the underlying Porter County filings

Subscribe to Porter County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.

View Porter County availability

Want updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.

Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Porter County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-16, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/porter-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)