DeKalb County, Indiana Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from DeKalb County court dockets. Updated 2026-08-03. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+10.9%) — last 3 complete months (132 filings) vs prior 3 complete months (119 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 6.6% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $11,520/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $173,912 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 40.9% of filings are Divorce — the dominant lead category in DeKalb County during the observed window.
About DeKalb County
DeKalb County is a county in the U.S. state of Indiana. As of the 2020 United States Census, the population was 43,265. The county seat is Auburn.
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
3165 verified property-related court filings tracked across 79 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
40 typical monthly filing volume.
#11 of 23 Indiana counties Keystone covers, ranked by total filing volume.
16% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (510 of 3165 filings).
$173,912 median estimated property value across the 1640 filings with property-enrichment data (52% coverage).
3.2% Indiana unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1295 | 40.9% | |
| Probate | 987 | 31.2% | |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 12.0% | |
| Guardianship | 284 | 9.0% | |
| Partition | 218 | 6.9% | |
| Inherited Property | 2 | 0.1% |
Each row is a distinct case verified for current owner-of-record before inclusion.
Get the full DeKalb County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 50 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 45 | -5 | |
| Mar 2020 | 42 | -3 | |
| Apr 2020 | 40 | -2 | |
| May 2020 | 37 | -3 | |
| Jun 2020 | 52 | +15 | |
| Jul 2020 | 35 | -17 | |
| Aug 2020 | 38 | +3 | |
| Sep 2020 | 34 | -4 | |
| Oct 2020 | 47 | +13 | |
| Nov 2020 | 28 | -19 | |
| Dec 2020 | 45 | +17 | |
| Jan 2021 | 54 | +9 | |
| Feb 2021 | 30 | -24 | |
| Mar 2021 | 49 | +19 | |
| Apr 2021 | 36 | -13 | |
| May 2021 | 34 | -2 | |
| Jun 2021 | 42 | +8 | |
| Jul 2021 | 40 | -2 | |
| Aug 2021 | 38 | -2 | |
| Sep 2021 | 48 | +10 | |
| Oct 2021 | 46 | -2 | |
| Nov 2021 | 34 | -12 | |
| Dec 2021 | 36 | +2 | |
| Jan 2022 | 40 | +4 | |
| Feb 2022 | 35 | -5 | |
| Mar 2022 | 47 | +12 | |
| Apr 2022 | 51 | +4 | |
| May 2022 | 51 | 0 | |
| Jun 2022 | 45 | -6 | |
| Jul 2022 | 49 | +4 | |
| Aug 2022 | 44 | -5 | |
| Sep 2022 | 30 | -14 | |
| Oct 2022 | 52 | +22 | |
| Nov 2022 | 42 | -10 | |
| Dec 2022 | 44 | +2 | |
| Jan 2023 | 44 | 0 | |
| Feb 2023 | 47 | +3 | |
| Mar 2023 | 51 | +4 | |
| Apr 2023 | 37 | -14 | |
| May 2023 | 44 | +7 | |
| Jun 2023 | 44 | 0 | |
| Jul 2023 | 56 | +12 | |
| Aug 2023 | 40 | -16 | |
| Sep 2023 | 44 | +4 | |
| Oct 2023 | 34 | -10 | |
| Nov 2023 | 32 | -2 | |
| Dec 2023 | 30 | -2 | |
| Jan 2024 | 40 | +10 | |
| Feb 2024 | 41 | +1 | |
| Mar 2024 | 34 | -7 | |
| Apr 2024 | 35 | +1 | |
| May 2024 | 41 | +6 | |
| Jun 2024 | 25 | -16 | |
| Jul 2024 | 37 | +12 | |
| Aug 2024 | 30 | -7 | |
| Sep 2024 | 41 | +11 | |
| Oct 2024 | 41 | 0 | |
| Nov 2024 | 38 | -3 | |
| Dec 2024 | 30 | -8 | |
| Jan 2025 | 34 | +4 | |
| Feb 2025 | 37 | +3 | |
| Mar 2025 | 45 | +8 | |
| Apr 2025 | 32 | -13 | |
| May 2025 | 27 | -5 | |
| Jun 2025 | 29 | +2 | |
| Jul 2025 | 32 | +3 | |
| Aug 2025 | 33 | +1 | |
| Sep 2025 | 37 | +4 | |
| Oct 2025 | 41 | +4 | |
| Nov 2025 | 35 | -6 | |
| Dec 2025 | 42 | +7 | |
| Jan 2026 | 44 | +2 | |
| Feb 2026 | 33 | -11 | |
| Mar 2026 | 43 | +10 | |
| Apr 2026 | 43 | 0 | |
| May 2026 | 42 | -1 | |
| Jun 2026 | 39 | -3 | |
| Jul 2026 | 51 | +12 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 10 ZIPs in DeKalb County account for 45.6% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46706 | AUBURN | 645 | 20.4% | |
| 46738 | Garrett | 296 | 9.4% | |
| 46721 | BUTLER | 177 | 5.6% | |
| 46793 | WATERLOO | 134 | 4.2% | |
| 46785 | Saint Joe | 48 | 1.5% | |
| 46705 | Ashley | 47 | 1.5% | |
| 46730 | CORUNNA | 36 | 1.1% | |
| 46788 | SPENCERVILLE | 31 | 1.0% | |
| 46742 | Hamilton | 21 | 0.7% | |
| 46747 | HUDSON | 8 | 0.3% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (47% of DeKalb County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with verified owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 98 | 6.0% | |
| $75k - $150k | 525 | 32.0% | |
| $150k - $250k | 612 | 37.3% | |
| $250k - $400k | 299 | 18.2% | |
| $400k+ | 106 | 6.5% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (52% coverage on DeKalb County filings). Median $173,912; mean $208,842.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in DeKalb County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 11 | 0.3% | |
| Mon | 633 | 20.0% | |
| Tue | 692 | 21.9% | |
| Wed | 619 | 19.6% | |
| Thu | 655 | 20.7% | |
| Fri | 544 | 17.2% | |
| Sat | 11 | 0.3% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 3165 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 1776 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 1968 |
| Median living area | 1,579 sqft |
| Median lot size | 0.29 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 18280 DeKalb County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | DeKalb County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Vacancy rate (incl. seasonal + for-sale) | 7.0% | 10.5% |
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 65.5% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 27.1% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 78.9% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 17.0% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. DeKalb County sits within the DeKalb County, IN. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $688 |
| 1-bedroom | $732 |
| 2-bedroom | $960 |
| 3-bedroom | $1,195 |
| 4-bedroom | $1,271 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in DeKalb County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 114 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -1.7% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 84.2% |
| Single-family units permitted | 96 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 18 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
DeKalb County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. Indiana state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana home price index (year-over-year) | +4.3% | 2026-01-01 |
| Indiana home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +64.9% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series INSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in DeKalb County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC | 2 |
| LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC | 2 |
| FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION | 1 |
| U.S. BANK N.A | 1 |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC | 1 |
| U.S. BANK N.A. | 1 |
| NEWREZ LLC | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from DeKalb County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in DeKalb County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 1785 filings (56.4% of all 3165 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Filings | Confirmed sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probate | 987 | 238 | 24.1% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 85 | 22.4% |
| Divorce | 1295 | 200 | 15.4% |
| Partition | 218 | 20 | 9.2% |
| Guardianship | 284 | 10 | 3.5% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 59.7% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 330 | 59.7% |
| Deferred | Sale happened well after the filing (over 1 year) — weaker filing connection | 116 | 21.0% |
| Concurrent | Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal | 84 | 15.2% |
| Pre-existing | Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded | 23 | 4.2% |
Who bought the property
Of the confirmed post-filing sales we can classify from the buyer of record, this is where the properties ended up, an investor-versus-owner-occupant read on each market.
| Buyer | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupant | 434 | 79.1% |
| Investor | 83 | 15.1% |
| Bank / auction | 22 | 4.0% |
| Government agency | 8 | 1.5% |
| Family / non-arm's-length | 2 | 0.4% |
Based on 549 confirmed sales with an identifiable buyer type.
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 1785 of 3165 filings (56.4% parcel coverage). Prices based on 63 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
DeKalb County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
FEMA flood zone exposure
Are distressed properties concentrated in flood-prone areas? By checking each property's coordinates against FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer, we identify which filings fall in Special Flood Hazard Areas (mandatory flood insurance zones). This analysis covers 85 properties with geocoded locations.
| Zone | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| X | 83 | 97.6% |
| AE | 1 | 1.2% |
| A | 1 | 1.2% |
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL), queried by property coordinates. Zones A/AE/AH/AO/V/VE are Special Flood Hazard Areas (1% annual flood chance, mandatory flood insurance). Zone X is minimal risk. 85 properties checked.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1295 | 40.9% | +48.8% |
| Probate | 987 | 31.2% | -47.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 12.0% | -14.3% |
| Guardianship | 284 | 9.0% | +9.1% |
| Partition | 218 | 6.9% | +25.0% |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Nov. Filing volume is relatively steady year-round.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 43.7 | 98% |
| Feb | 38.3 | 86% |
| Mar | 44.4 | 100% |
| Apr | 39.1 | 88% |
| May | 39.4 | 89% |
| Jun | 39.4 | 89% |
| Jul | 42.9 | 97% |
| Aug | 37.2 | 84% |
| Sep | 39 | 88% |
| Oct | 43.5 | 98% |
| Nov | 34.8 | 78% |
| Dec | 37.8 | 85% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.3x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress shows moderate geographic concentration — the top 5 ZIP codes represent 41.1% of filings.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46706 | Auburn | 645 | 20.4% | $200,300 |
| 46738 | Garrett | 296 | 9.4% | $144,350 |
| 46721 | Butler | 177 | 5.6% | $148,300 |
| 46793 | Waterloo | 134 | 4.2% | $140,600 |
| 46785 | Saint Joe | 48 | 1.5% | $194,432 |
| 46705 | Ashley | 47 | 1.5% | $137,500 |
| 46730 | Corunna | 36 | 1.1% | $222,114 |
| 46788 | Spencerville | 31 | 1.0% | $150,450 |
| 46742 | Hamilton | 21 | 0.7% | $134,700 |
| 46747 | Hudson | 8 | 0.3% | $168,950 |
Top 10 of 21 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
16.1% of filings involve non-resident owners. Probate filings show the highest absentee rate (25.8%), suggesting investor-owned properties concentrated in that category.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1295 | 13.7% |
| Probate | 987 | 25.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 11.9% |
| Guardianship | 284 | 5.6% |
| Partition | 218 | 7.8% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Probate share is declining. High diversity in distress types suggests multiple independent factors driving court filings, not a single economic shock.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 44.4% | 40.8% | +3.6pp |
| Probate | 22.2% | 31.4% | -9.2pp (falling) |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 13.3% | 11.9% | +1.4pp |
| Partition | 11.1% | 6.8% | +4.3pp |
| Guardianship | 6.7% | 9.0% | -2.3pp |
| Inherited Property | 2.2% | 0.0% | +2.2pp |
Distress diversity score: 2.12 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Case Outcomes & Resolution Timeline
44.1% of tracked cases have reached a resolution, with a median time of 319 days from filing to resolution. The most common resolution is judgment entered (989 cases, 71% of resolved).
| Resolution Type | Median Days | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Judgment | 351 | 218 |
| Dismissal | 260 | 53 |
| Settlement | 189 | 17 |
| Sheriff sale | 387 | 54 |
Detailed disposition breakdown
| Disposition | Count | % of Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| Final Judgment | 989 | 70.8% |
| Court Dismissed | 251 | 18.0% |
| Sheriff Sale | 114 | 8.2% |
| Settlement | 43 | 3.1% |
Outcomes by Case Type
| Case Type | Cases | Resolved | Resolution Rate | Median Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1295 | 908 | 70.1% | 368 |
| Probate | 987 | 104 | 10.5% | 210 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 259 | 68.3% | 338 |
| Guardianship | 284 | 126 | 44.4% | 490 |
| Partition | 218 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Based on 3165 court filings with docket event tracking. Based on a robust sample; percentages are reliable. Outcomes derived from docket entries (judgments, dismissals, sheriff sales, and settlement agreements). 1768 cases are still active or pending resolution.
Court Docket Activity
Across 2390 tracked cases, the average case has 28 docket entries (median 21). 71.8% of cases are in the "advanced (16+ events)" stage. Guardianship cases are the most court-active at 33.6 events on average. Higher docket activity signals that courts are actively processing the case, which can indicate timeline urgency for investor outreach.
| Activity level | Cases | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Early stage (1-5 events) | 58 | 2.4% |
| Mid-process (6-15 events) | 617 | 25.8% |
| Advanced (16+ events) | 1715 | 71.8% |
Docket activity by case type
| Case type | Avg. events | Cases tracked |
|---|---|---|
| Guardianship | 33.6 | 212 |
| Divorce | 32.3 | 1040 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 26.9 | 316 |
| Probate | 20.5 | 822 |
Based on 2390 cases with docket event tracking from DeKalb County court records. Docket entries include filings, hearings, orders, and motions.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $167,000. Divorce filings involve the highest-value properties (median $175,700), while Pre-Foreclosure filings trend lower (median $145,100). The largest segment (58.5%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 315 | 18.1% |
| $100K - $250K | 1016 | 58.5% |
| $250K - $500K | 357 | 20.6% |
| $500K - $1M | 41 | 2.4% |
| Over $1M | 7 | 0.4% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $175,700 | $204,827 | 696 |
| Probate | $174,629 | $203,458 | 578 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $145,100 | $178,564 | 309 |
| Guardianship | $158,800 | $188,816 | 100 |
| Partition | $167,900 | $176,871 | 52 |
Based on county assessor records for 1736 properties with court filings (54.8% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 14 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 46706 (Auburn) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 75/100, driven by high filing volume (645 cases). 6 of 14 scored ZIPs are above the average score of 40.
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 46706 | Auburn |
75
|
645 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 46738 | Garrett |
56
|
296 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 46721 | Butler |
49
|
177 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 46793 | Waterloo |
47
|
134 | — | 0% |
| #5 | 46705 | Ashley |
42
|
47 | — | 0% |
| #6 | 46730 | Corunna |
42
|
36 | — | 0% |
| #7 | 46785 | Saint Joe |
37
|
48 | — | 0% |
| #8 | 46763 | Laotto |
35
|
7 | — | 0% |
| #9 | 46742 | Hamilton |
31
|
21 | — | 0% |
| #10 | 46788 | Spencerville |
31
|
31 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 3165 court filings across 14 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$343,755,849 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 1736 court-filed properties. 73% of properties with equity data carry 20%+ equity, signaling owners with real financial stakes in resolution. Divorce filings represent the largest capital pool ($142,559,288 across 696 properties).
Equity Position of Distressed Properties
Median equity position: 33.3% · Based on 11 properties with equity data
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $142,559,288 | 696 | $204,827 | 75.0% |
| Probate | $117,598,593 | 578 | $203,458 | -- |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $55,176,408 | 309 | $178,564 | 66.7% |
| Guardianship | $18,881,574 | 100 | $188,816 | -- |
| Partition | $9,197,287 | 52 | $176,871 | -- |
Based on 1736 properties with assessor valuations (54.8% of 3165 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
3,165 court filings tracked with 1,397 resolved (44.1% absorption rate). Resolved cases take an average of 391 days. Probate cases resolve fastest (avg 282 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (avg 442 days).
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 50 | 0 | +50 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2020 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 64.4% | |
| Mar 2020 | 42 | 0 | +42 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2020 | 40 | 0 | +40 | 0.0% | |
| May 2020 | 37 | 0 | +37 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2020 | 52 | 34 | +18 | 65.4% | |
| Jul 2020 | 35 | 21 | +14 | 60.0% | |
| Aug 2020 | 38 | 0 | +38 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2020 | 34 | 22 | +12 | 64.7% | |
| Oct 2020 | 47 | 27 | +20 | 57.4% | |
| Nov 2020 | 28 | 0 | +28 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2020 | 45 | 22 | +23 | 48.9% | |
| Jan 2021 | 54 | 0 | +54 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2021 | 30 | 0 | +30 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2021 | 49 | 30 | +19 | 61.2% | |
| Apr 2021 | 36 | 0 | +36 | 0.0% | |
| May 2021 | 34 | 0 | +34 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2021 | 42 | 24 | +18 | 57.1% | |
| Jul 2021 | 40 | 0 | +40 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2021 | 38 | 0 | +38 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2021 | 48 | 18 | +30 | 37.5% | |
| Oct 2021 | 46 | 24 | +22 | 52.2% | |
| Nov 2021 | 34 | 20 | +14 | 58.8% | |
| Dec 2021 | 36 | 17 | +19 | 47.2% | |
| Jan 2022 | 40 | 27 | +13 | 67.5% | |
| Feb 2022 | 35 | 17 | +18 | 48.6% | |
| Mar 2022 | 47 | 33 | +14 | 70.2% | |
| Apr 2022 | 51 | 26 | +25 | 51.0% | |
| May 2022 | 51 | 28 | +23 | 54.9% | |
| Jun 2022 | 45 | 24 | +21 | 53.3% | |
| Jul 2022 | 49 | 38 | +11 | 77.6% | |
| Aug 2022 | 44 | 26 | +18 | 59.1% | |
| Sep 2022 | 30 | 18 | +12 | 60.0% | |
| Oct 2022 | 52 | 28 | +24 | 53.8% | |
| Nov 2022 | 42 | 26 | +16 | 61.9% | |
| Dec 2022 | 44 | 28 | +16 | 63.6% | |
| Jan 2023 | 44 | 22 | +22 | 50.0% | |
| Feb 2023 | 47 | 29 | +18 | 61.7% | |
| Mar 2023 | 51 | 31 | +20 | 60.8% | |
| Apr 2023 | 37 | 18 | +19 | 48.6% | |
| May 2023 | 44 | 29 | +15 | 65.9% | |
| Jun 2023 | 44 | 23 | +21 | 52.3% | |
| Jul 2023 | 56 | 21 | +35 | 37.5% | |
| Aug 2023 | 40 | 24 | +16 | 60.0% | |
| Sep 2023 | 44 | 26 | +18 | 59.1% | |
| Oct 2023 | 34 | 9 | +25 | 26.5% | |
| Nov 2023 | 32 | 19 | +13 | 59.4% | |
| Dec 2023 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 56.7% | |
| Jan 2024 | 40 | 0 | +40 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2024 | 41 | 21 | +20 | 51.2% | |
| Mar 2024 | 34 | 13 | +21 | 38.2% | |
| Apr 2024 | 35 | 21 | +14 | 60.0% | |
| May 2024 | 41 | 21 | +20 | 51.2% | |
| Jun 2024 | 25 | 20 | +5 | 80.0% | |
| Jul 2024 | 37 | 17 | +20 | 45.9% | |
| Aug 2024 | 30 | 22 | +8 | 73.3% | |
| Sep 2024 | 41 | 24 | +17 | 58.5% | |
| Oct 2024 | 41 | 26 | +15 | 63.4% | |
| Nov 2024 | 38 | 24 | +14 | 63.2% | |
| Dec 2024 | 30 | 19 | +11 | 63.3% | |
| Jan 2025 | 34 | 11 | +23 | 32.4% | |
| Feb 2025 | 37 | 19 | +18 | 51.4% | |
| Mar 2025 | 45 | 27 | +18 | 60.0% | |
| Apr 2025 | 32 | 22 | +10 | 68.8% | |
| May 2025 | 27 | 13 | +14 | 48.1% | |
| Jun 2025 | 29 | 15 | +14 | 51.7% | |
| Jul 2025 | 32 | 18 | +14 | 56.2% | |
| Aug 2025 | 33 | 21 | +12 | 63.6% | |
| Sep 2025 | 37 | 19 | +18 | 51.4% | |
| Oct 2025 | 41 | 16 | +25 | 39.0% | |
| Nov 2025 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 37.1% | |
| Dec 2025 | 42 | 19 | +23 | 45.2% | |
| Jan 2026 | 44 | 20 | +24 | 45.5% | |
| Feb 2026 | 33 | 13 | +20 | 39.4% | |
| Mar 2026 | 43 | 14 | +29 | 32.6% | |
| Apr 2026 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 41.9% | |
| May 2026 | 42 | 8 | +34 | 19.0% | |
| Jun 2026 | 39 | 5 | +34 | 12.8% | |
| Jul 2026 | 51 | 3 | +48 | 5.9% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1295 | 908 | 70.1% | 414 |
| Probate | 987 | 104 | 10.5% | 282 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 259 | 68.3% | 387 |
| Guardianship | 284 | 126 | 44.4% | 442 |
| Partition | 218 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 1397 resolved cases out of 3165 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
68.3% of distressed properties are classified as Single Family, followed by Duplex/Multi-Family (16.1%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 1,134 | 68.3% | |
| Duplex/Multi-Family | 268 | 16.1% | |
| Agricultural | 131 | 7.9% | |
| Residential | 103 | 6.2% | |
| Commercial | 18 | 1.1% | |
| Industrial | 4 | 0.2% | |
| Condo/Townhouse | 2 | 0.1% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | Single Family | 70.6% | 660 |
| Probate | Single Family | 61.2% | 551 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | Single Family | 78.0% | 300 |
| Guardianship | Single Family | 77.1% | 96 |
| Partition | Single Family | 42.3% | 52 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 1,660 properties (52.4% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
1,454 cases (45.9%) have been active for over a year without resolution. Probate cases resolve fastest (median 210 days), while Guardianship cases take longest (median 490 days). 46 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 46 | 2 | 44 | 4.3% |
| 30-90 days | 78 | 13 | 65 | 16.7% |
| 3-6 months | 120 | 40 | 80 | 33.3% |
| 6-12 months | 237 | 112 | 125 | 47.3% |
| 1-2 years | 418 | 242 | 176 | 57.9% |
| 2+ years | 2,266 | 988 | 1,278 | 43.6% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 1,295 | 908 | 70.1% | 366d |
| Probate | 987 | 104 | 10.5% | 210d |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 379 | 259 | 68.3% | 327d |
| Guardianship | 284 | 126 | 44.4% | 490d |
| Partition | 218 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
1,640 filings (51.8% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (44%). Newer properties (2000+) average $282,716 — 2.0x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($142,514). 1960–1979 cases resolve fastest (median 212d) vs Pre-1960 (379d).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 727 | 44.3% | $142,514 | 379d |
| 1960–1979 | 280 | 17.1% | $207,652 | 212d |
| 1980–1999 | 317 | 19.3% | $220,260 | 316d |
| 2000+ | 316 | 19.3% | $282,716 | 290d |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $282,716 — 1.98x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($142,514).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Municipality filing concentration in DeKalb County
Court filings in DeKalb County span 105 municipalities. Auburn leads with 743 filings (39.8% of total), predominantly Divorce (42.0%). Filing activity is geographically concentrated — the top 3 municipalities account for 69% of all filings.
| Municipality | Filings | Share | Top case type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn | 743 | 39.8% | Divorce (42.0%) |
| Garrett | 357 | 19.1% | Divorce (41.7%) |
| Butler | 191 | 10.2% | Divorce (42.4%) |
| Waterloo | 151 | 8.1% | Probate (31.8%) |
| Ashley | 56 | 3.0% | Probate (32.1%) |
| Corunna | 45 | 2.4% | Probate (42.2%) |
| Saint Joe | 41 | 2.2% | Divorce (51.2%) |
| Fort Wayne | 41 | 2.2% | Divorce (65.9%) |
| Spencerville | 38 | 2.0% | Probate (50.0%) |
| Hamilton | 26 | 1.4% | Divorce (57.7%) |
| Kendallville | 18 | 1.0% | Divorce (61.1%) |
| Hudson | 10 | 0.5% | Probate (50.0%) |
| Angola | 8 | 0.4% | Divorce (62.5%) |
| Laotto | 7 | 0.4% | Guardianship (28.6%) |
| Avilla | 7 | 0.4% | Divorce (71.4%) |
Top 15 of 105 municipalities with court filings. Data from 1,868 filings (59% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 18 comparable quarters show 2,134 tracked filings in DeKalb County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 124) was stable vs prior (2026 Q1: 120, +3.3%).
| Quarter | Total | Divorce | Probate | Pre-Foreclosure | Guardianship |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 122 | 51 (41.8%) | 39 (32.0%) | 17 (13.9%) | 6 (4.9%) |
| 2022 Q2 | 147 | 54 (36.7%) | 47 (32.0%) | 18 (12.2%) | 13 (8.8%) |
| 2022 Q3 | 123 | 52 (42.3%) | 32 (26.0%) | 18 (14.6%) | 11 (8.9%) |
| 2022 Q4 | 138 | 53 (38.4%) | 39 (28.3%) | 22 (15.9%) | 17 (12.3%) |
| 2023 Q1 | 142 | 52 (36.6%) | 46 (32.4%) | 21 (14.8%) | 14 (9.9%) |
| 2023 Q2 | 125 | 51 (40.8%) | 29 (23.2%) | 16 (12.8%) | 8 (6.4%) |
| 2023 Q3 | 140 | 62 (44.3%) | 42 (30.0%) | 14 (10.0%) | 12 (8.6%) |
| 2023 Q4 | 96 | 30 (31.2%) | 36 (37.5%) | 11 (11.5%) | 8 (8.3%) |
| 2024 Q1 | 115 | 49 (42.6%) | 38 (33.0%) | 16 (13.9%) | 7 (6.1%) |
| 2024 Q2 | 101 | 46 (45.5%) | 27 (26.7%) | 13 (12.9%) | 7 (6.9%) |
| 2024 Q3 | 108 | 39 (36.1%) | 35 (32.4%) | 24 (22.2%) | 7 (6.5%) |
| 2024 Q4 | 109 | 47 (43.1%) | 28 (25.7%) | 19 (17.4%) | 12 (11.0%) |
| 2025 Q1 | 116 | 39 (33.6%) | 49 (42.2%) | 17 (14.7%) | 11 (9.5%) |
| 2025 Q2 | 88 | 42 (47.7%) | 28 (31.8%) | 11 (12.5%) | 7 (8.0%) |
| 2025 Q3 | 102 | 42 (41.2%) | 26 (25.5%) | 15 (14.7%) | 9 (8.8%) |
| 2025 Q4 | 118 | 41 (34.7%) | 35 (29.7%) | 20 (16.9%) | 6 (5.1%) |
| 2026 Q1 | 120 | 39 (32.5%) | 50 (41.7%) | 18 (15.0%) | 10 (8.3%) |
| 2026 Q2 | 124 | 56 (45.2%) | 26 (21.0%) | 19 (15.3%) | 12 (9.7%) |
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $155,200, with the largest concentration (24.3%) in the $100K–$150K range. Probate filings have the highest median value ($159,600) while Partition filings are lowest ($118,950).
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 166 | 9.4% | |
| $50K–$100K | 238 | 13.4% | |
| $100K–$150K | 431 | 24.3% | |
| $150K–$200K | 373 | 21.0% | |
| $200K–$300K | 351 | 19.8% | |
| $300K–$500K | 178 | 10.0% | |
| $500K+ | 36 | 2.0% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | $157,600 | $187,709 | 713 |
| Probate | $159,600 | $185,466 | 589 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | $141,300 | $170,205 | 313 |
| Guardianship | $157,000 | $188,517 | 101 |
| Partition | $118,950 | $154,344 | 56 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 1,773 properties (56.0% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 6.5 years, with 32.2% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Probate cases show the longest tenure (8.5 yr median) vs. Partition (5.3 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 141 | 17.3% | |
| 2–5 years | 187 | 22.9% | |
| 5–10 years | 226 | 27.7% | |
| 10–20 years | 186 | 22.8% | |
| 20+ years | 77 | 9.4% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 5.7 yr | 7.5 yr | 389 |
| Probate | 8.5 yr | 10.4 yr | 177 |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 6.2 yr | 7.7 yr | 150 |
| Guardianship | 6.7 yr | 9.2 yr | 67 |
| Partition | 5.3 yr | 8.9 yr | 34 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 817 properties (25.8% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in DeKalb County
Of 2,972 unique property owners in court filings, 157 (5.3%) appear in multiple cases, including 24 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 10 cases spanning 64 months. Guardianship cases have the highest repeat rate at 16.5%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 60 | 1250 | 4.8% |
| Probate | 55 | 942 | 5.8% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 29 | 350 | 8.3% |
| Guardianship | 40 | 242 | 16.5% |
| Partition | 2 | 215 | 0.9% |
Analysis based on 2,972 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Serial distressed properties in DeKalb County
Of 1,653 unique properties in court filings, 138 (8.3%) have multiple filings (averaging 2.1 filings per property). Average time between repeat filings: 17 months. Guardianship properties have the highest repeat rate at 21.6%.
Serial distress rate by case type
| Case type | Serial properties | Total properties | Serial rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 72 | 680 | 10.6% |
| Probate | 49 | 575 | 8.5% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 52 | 318 | 16.4% |
| Guardianship | 19 | 88 | 21.6% |
| Partition | 10 | 54 | 18.5% |
Analysis based on 1,653 unique property addresses across court filings. Serial distressed properties have 2 or more distinct case filings at the same address.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 1,640 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 17.2% (median land value $30,500, median improvement value $137,100). 42 properties (2.6%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Partition cases skew most land-heavy (median 18.9%) while Pre-Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (16.4%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 149 | 9.1% |
| 10–20% | 897 | 54.7% |
| 20–30% | 454 | 27.7% |
| 30–50% | 98 | 6.0% |
| 50–70% | 22 | 1.3% |
| Over 70% | 20 | 1.2% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 666 | 17.1% |
| Probate | 533 | 18.2% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 299 | 16.4% |
| Guardianship | 98 | 18.5% |
| Partition | 43 | 18.9% |
Analysis of 1,640 properties (51.8% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Prior sale value trajectory
Across 735 properties with purchase and assessed value data, the median value change since purchase is -19.5%. 532 properties (72.4%) are underwater (current assessed value below purchase price). Short-hold owners (<5 yr) show a median -13.3% value change vs +17.5% for long-hold (10+ yr). Divorce cases have the highest underwater rate (76.2%) while Guardianship has the lowest (52.9%).
Value change distribution
| Value change bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 50%+ loss | 124 | 16.9% |
| 20–50% loss | 238 | 32.4% |
| 0–20% loss | 170 | 23.1% |
| 0–20% gain | 83 | 11.3% |
| 20–50% gain | 50 | 6.8% |
| 50–100% gain | 30 | 4.1% |
| 100%+ gain | 40 | 5.4% |
Holding period vs value change
(160 properties)
(51 properties)
Value trajectory by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median change | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divorce | 282 | -19.8% | 76.2% |
| Probate | 271 | -20.7% | 73.4% |
| Pre-Foreclosure | 137 | -13.1% | 65.0% |
| Partition | 28 | -35.0% | 71.4% |
| Guardianship | 17 | -8.5% | 52.9% |
Analysis of 735 properties (23.2% of filings) with both prior sale price and current assessed value data.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in Indiana. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from DeKalb County court records, which are public information.
- Every filing in this dataset has been verified for current owner-of-record. Entity-owned filings (LLCs, trusts, banks) and properties where the named party is not the current owner are excluded.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (52% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-08-03 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within DeKalb County
Where filings concentrate inside DeKalb County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Auburn | 591 | 44.1% |
| Garrett | 264 | 19.7% |
| Butler | 154 | 11.5% |
| Waterloo | 130 | 9.7% |
| Ashley | 44 | 3.3% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total DeKalb County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related Indiana guides
Get the underlying DeKalb County filings
Subscribe to DeKalb County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View DeKalb County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "DeKalb County Indiana Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-08-03, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/dekalb-in-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)