Cape May County, New Jersey Court Filings Intelligence
Live court-record analysis of property-related filings (foreclosure, probate, divorce, partition, guardianship). Data sourced direct from Cape May County court dockets. Updated 2026-07-16. See methodology.
- Filing volume accelerating (+18.4%) — last 2 complete months (58 filings) vs prior 2 complete months (49 filings). Excludes the current calendar month (in progress).
- Max gross cap rate 9.4% at HUD Fair Market Rent — $21,504/year (2BR FMR × 12) on the $228,500 median estimated market value. Section-8-eligible rent ceiling; real-market rent typically exceeds FMR; excludes operating costs (taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management).
- 97.8% of filings are Foreclosure — the dominant lead category in Cape May County during the observed window.
About Cape May County
Cape May County is the southernmost county in the U.S. state of New Jersey. Much of the county is located on the Cape May peninsula, bound by the Delaware Bay to its west and the Atlantic Ocean to its south and east. Adjacent to the Atlantic coastline are five barrier islands that have been built up as seaside resorts. A consistently popular summer destination with 30 miles (48 km) of beaches, Cape May County attracts vacationers from New Jersey and surrounding states, with the summer population exceeding 750,000. An estimated 11.6 million visitors in 2023 generated annual tourism spending of
Source: Wikipedia
At a glance
1249 property-related court filings tracked across 79 months (Jan 2020 to Jul 2026).
0% of filings involve owners whose mailing address differs from the property address (0 of 1249 filings).
$228,500 median estimated property value across the 199 filings with property-enrichment data (16% coverage).
4.2% New Jersey unemployment rate (BLS, as of 2026-05). Filings should be read against the local-economy backdrop.
Filing type breakdown
| Filing type | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure (Post-Filing) | 1222 | 97.8% | |
| Estate | 15 | 1.2% | |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0.8% | |
| Divorce | 2 | 0.2% |
Each row is a distinct case as recorded on the county docket.
Get the full Cape May County lead list
Day-of-filing access with owner names, phone numbers, and property details. 7-day free trial, no credit card.
Monthly filing activity
| Month | Filings | vs prior | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 27 | ||
| Feb 2020 | 29 | +2 | |
| Mar 2020 | 17 | -12 | |
| Apr 2020 | 21 | +4 | |
| May 2020 | 9 | -12 | |
| Jun 2020 | 8 | -1 | |
| Jul 2020 | 4 | -4 | |
| Aug 2020 | 5 | +1 | |
| Sep 2020 | 16 | +11 | |
| Oct 2020 | 8 | -8 | |
| Nov 2020 | 7 | -1 | |
| Dec 2020 | 6 | -1 | |
| Jan 2021 | 3 | -3 | |
| Feb 2021 | 11 | +8 | |
| Mar 2021 | 13 | +2 | |
| Apr 2021 | 17 | +4 | |
| May 2021 | 13 | -4 | |
| Jun 2021 | 10 | -3 | |
| Jul 2021 | 5 | -5 | |
| Aug 2021 | 15 | +10 | |
| Sep 2021 | 6 | -9 | |
| Oct 2021 | 11 | +5 | |
| Nov 2021 | 8 | -3 | |
| Dec 2021 | 16 | +8 | |
| Jan 2022 | 9 | -7 | |
| Feb 2022 | 14 | +5 | |
| Mar 2022 | 19 | +5 | |
| Apr 2022 | 18 | -1 | |
| May 2022 | 18 | 0 | |
| Jun 2022 | 20 | +2 | |
| Jul 2022 | 18 | -2 | |
| Aug 2022 | 15 | -3 | |
| Sep 2022 | 14 | -1 | |
| Oct 2022 | 17 | +3 | |
| Nov 2022 | 27 | +10 | |
| Dec 2022 | 17 | -10 | |
| Jan 2023 | 14 | -3 | |
| Feb 2023 | 13 | -1 | |
| Mar 2023 | 23 | +10 | |
| Apr 2023 | 25 | +2 | |
| May 2023 | 23 | -2 | |
| Jun 2023 | 24 | +1 | |
| Jul 2023 | 12 | -12 | |
| Aug 2023 | 16 | +4 | |
| Sep 2023 | 18 | +2 | |
| Oct 2023 | 16 | -2 | |
| Nov 2023 | 11 | -5 | |
| Dec 2023 | 11 | 0 | |
| Jan 2024 | 15 | +4 | |
| Feb 2024 | 17 | +2 | |
| Mar 2024 | 22 | +5 | |
| Apr 2024 | 17 | -5 | |
| May 2024 | 18 | +1 | |
| Jun 2024 | 13 | -5 | |
| Jul 2024 | 13 | 0 | |
| Aug 2024 | 16 | +3 | |
| Sep 2024 | 14 | -2 | |
| Oct 2024 | 10 | -4 | |
| Nov 2024 | 19 | +9 | |
| Dec 2024 | 23 | +4 | |
| Jan 2025 | 20 | -3 | |
| Feb 2025 | 10 | -10 | |
| Mar 2025 | 25 | +15 | |
| Apr 2025 | 18 | -7 | |
| May 2025 | 15 | -3 | |
| Jun 2025 | 6 | -9 | |
| Jul 2025 | 16 | +10 | |
| Aug 2025 | 16 | 0 | |
| Sep 2025 | 21 | +5 | |
| Oct 2025 | 22 | +1 | |
| Nov 2025 | 8 | -14 | |
| Dec 2025 | 15 | +7 | |
| Jan 2026 | 17 | +2 | |
| Feb 2026 | 15 | -2 | |
| Mar 2026 | 28 | +13 | |
| Apr 2026 | 21 | -7 | |
| May 2026 | 19 | -2 | |
| Jun 2026 | 39 | +20 | |
| Jul 2026 | 24 | -15 |
Each row reflects new filings entering the dataset that month, after ownership verification. Most recent month may be partial.
Geographic concentration by ZIP
Top 8 ZIPs in Cape May County account for 2.2% of all tracked filings, showing where distressed real estate activity clusters.
| ZIP | City | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08204 | Cape May | 7 | 0.6% | |
| 08214 | Dennis Township | 6 | 0.5% | |
| 08226 | Ocean City | 6 | 0.5% | |
| 08210 | Cape May Court House | 5 | 0.4% | |
| 08223 | Marmora | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 08247 | 1 | 0.1% | ||
| 08260 | Wildwood Crest | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 08270 | Woodbine | 1 | 0.1% |
Based on filings with a parseable property address (2% of Cape May County filings).
Target these ZIP codes before your competitors
Keystone delivers new filings with owner contact info the same day they hit the court docket.
Property value distribution
| Estimated value | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $75k | 2 | 1.0% | |
| $75k - $150k | 30 | 15.1% | |
| $150k - $250k | 79 | 39.7% | |
| $250k - $400k | 39 | 19.6% | |
| $400k+ | 49 | 24.6% |
Source: third-party property enrichment (16% coverage on Cape May County filings). Median $228,500; mean $379,287.
These properties are in your market right now
Get owner names, phone numbers, and property details for every new filing in Cape May County. One subscriber per county.
Day-of-week filing pattern
| Day | Filings | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 0 | 0.0% | |
| Mon | 210 | 16.8% | |
| Tue | 284 | 22.7% | |
| Wed | 236 | 18.9% | |
| Thu | 270 | 21.6% | |
| Fri | 249 | 19.9% | |
| Sat | 0 | 0.0% |
Filings cluster Monday through Friday, with weekend filings essentially absent (court system closed). Computed for 1249 filings with a parseable date.
Building characteristics
Per-property details from third-party property enrichment, aggregated across the 214 filings with characteristic data:
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Median year built | 1964 |
| Median lot size | 0.21 acres |
| Owner-occupied (at time of enrichment) | 0.0% |
Housing stock + distress signals
Underlying housing stock and distress indicators across all 99625 Cape May County housing units, from US Census ACS 5-year data. National reference values shown for context.
| Indicator | Cape May County | US average |
|---|---|---|
| Share of owner-occupied units carrying a mortgage | 59.2% | 60.8% |
| Pre-1940 housing stock | 13.3% | 12.3% |
| Single-family detached share of housing stock | 52.3% | 61.2% |
| Residents age 65 or older | 28.6% | 17.3% |
Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS 2023 5-year). National reference values are ACS 2022 5-year US totals. Why these matter: vacancy rate is the strongest single proxy for distressed inventory; mortgage-carrying share defines the risk pool exposed to rate environment; pre-1940 stock signals deferred maintenance and renovation opportunity; senior population correlates with probate pipeline depth.
Rent benchmark (HUD Fair Market Rent)
HUD sets Fair Market Rents at the metro area level — the same FMRs apply to every county within the metro. Cape May County sits within the Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ. Used to set Section 8 voucher amounts; investors use it as a defensible rent-estimate floor for buy-to-rent underwriting.
| Unit size | Fair market rent / month |
|---|---|
| Efficiency / studio | $1,320 |
| 1-bedroom | $1,366 |
| 2-bedroom | $1,792 |
| 3-bedroom | $2,396 |
| 4-bedroom | $2,405 |
Source: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents (None). 40th-percentile gross rent including utilities. Why this matters: Section-8-eligible tenants are a baseline demand floor for rental inventory at these price points; FMR is the official ceiling for voucher-eligible rents.
New construction (market momentum)
Annual building permits filed in Cape May County from the US Census Building Permits Survey. Trend signal on whether new housing demand is accelerating or contracting in this market.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Total housing units permitted (2025) | 854 |
| Year-over-year change (2024 → 2025) | -4.6% |
| Single-family share of permits (2025) | 78.6% |
| Single-family units permitted | 671 |
| Multifamily units permitted (2+ units per building) | 183 |
Source: US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey, annual cumulative data. Why this matters: permits trending up signals strong demand for new inventory; permits contracting at the same time foreclosure activity rises indicates broader market softening (deals price differently). Multifamily share shows whether the market is densifying or holding to single-family stock.
Macro context: state home prices and national delinquency
Cape May County filings should be read against the broader housing-market backdrop. New Jersey state home-price trend and the national mortgage-delinquency rate are the two macro signals most directly relevant to foreclosure exposure.
| Indicator | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey home price index (year-over-year) | +5.4% | 2026-01-01 |
| New Jersey home price index (cumulative since 2020) | +74.5% | 2026-01-01 |
| National mortgage delinquency rate (30+ day, single-family) | 1.89% | 2026-01-01 |
Sources: Federal Housing Finance Agency state house price indices (FRED series NJSTHPI); Federal Reserve Board, Mortgage Delinquency 30+Day Rate on Single-Family Residential Mortgages (FRED series DRSFRMACBS). Updated quarterly. Free public data.
Most active foreclosure plaintiffs in Cape May County
Top mortgage holders and servicers named in foreclosure complaints filed in this county. Lender names are normalized to collapse common legal-suffix variants (e.g. "as Trustee for X Trust", "N.A.").
| Plaintiff | Foreclosure filings |
|---|---|
| WELLS FARGO BANK NA | 1 |
| BANK OF NEW YORK TRUS | 1 |
| PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC | 1 |
| MIDFIRST BANK | 1 |
| PNC BANK N.A | 1 |
| DEL DUCA LEWIS & BERR LLC | 1 |
| LENDERS FUNDING LLC | 1 |
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | 1 |
| UNITED RENATALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC | 1 |
Source: plaintiff names extracted from Cape May County foreclosure complaint text. Court records are public information.
Post-filing sale outcomes in Cape May County
What happens to distressed properties after a court filing? By cross-referencing each filing's property with county assessor and deed-transfer records, we track which properties sold, how long the process took, and at what price. This analysis covers 342 filings (27.4% of all 1249 filings) where parcel-level tracking is available.
Time from filing to sale
How quickly do distressed properties sell after a court filing is recorded? This distribution shows where post-filing sales cluster.
| Timeframe | Sales | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 30 days | 2 | 2.9% | |
| 31–90 days | 10 | 14.3% | |
| 91–180 days | 4 | 5.7% | |
| 181–365 days | 14 | 20.0% | |
| Over 1 year | 40 | 57.1% |
Sale rates by filing type
Not all distress types lead to property sales at the same rate. Foreclosures tend to result in eventual sales more often than probate or divorce filings.
| Filing type | Tracked | Sold | Sale rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 315 | 73 | 23.2% |
| Estate | 15 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
How sales relate to the filing
Not every post-filing sale is caused by the court case. We classify each sale's relationship to the original filing so investors can focus on the highest-signal outcomes. 58.9% of confirmed sales were directly driven by the filing.
| Attribution | Meaning | Sales | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing-driven | Sale occurred as a direct result of the court filing (e.g., foreclosure auction, probate liquidation) | 43 | 58.9% |
| Deferred | Sale happened well after the filing (over 1 year) — weaker filing connection | 18 | 24.7% |
| Concurrent | Sale recorded around the same time as the filing — likely related but not proven causal | 10 | 13.7% |
| Pre-existing | Property was already in a sales process before the court filing was recorded | 2 | 2.7% |
Source: county assessor and deed-transfer records cross-referenced with court filings by parcel ID. Sale outcomes tracked for 342 of 1249 filings (27.4% parcel coverage). Timing based on 70 sales with valid filing and sale dates. Prices based on 60 sales with recorded sale amounts.
Be the first investor to reach these owners
Cape May County leads are delivered the same day they're filed. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
Filing velocity by case type
How each distress category is trending — are foreclosures accelerating while divorces cool, or vice versa? This breakdown is only possible with direct court-record data.
| Case type | Total | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 1222 | 97.8% | +10.0% |
| Estate | 15 | 1.2% | -- |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0.8% | -- |
Trend = recent 2-3 month volume vs prior 2-3 months (current partial month excluded). Positive = accelerating; negative = cooling.
Seasonal filing patterns
Court filings peak in Mar and are lowest in Jul. The 1.9x peak-to-trough ratio suggests strong seasonal patterns — investors who time their outreach around Mar can reach more distressed homeowners.
| Month | Avg filings | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 15 | 71% |
| Feb | 15.6 | 74% |
| Mar | 21 | 100% |
| Apr | 19.6 | 93% |
| May | 16.4 | 78% |
| Jun | 17.1 | 81% |
| Jul | 11.3 | 54% |
| Aug | 13.8 | 66% |
| Sep | 14.8 | 70% |
| Oct | 14 | 67% |
| Nov | 13.3 | 63% |
| Dec | 14.7 | 70% |
Average filings per calendar month across all observed years. Relative column shows each month as a percentage of the peak month (Mar), with a 1.9x peak-to-trough ratio.
ZIP code distress hotspots
Distress is geographically dispersed across 8 ZIP codes, with no single area dominating.
| ZIP | Area | Filings | Share | Median value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08204 | Cape May | 7 | 0.6% | $275,100 |
| 08214 | Dennis Township | 6 | 0.5% | $202,600 |
| 08226 | Ocean City | 6 | 0.5% | $925,000 |
| 08210 | Cape May Court House | 5 | 0.4% | $159,050 |
| 08223 | Marmora | 1 | 0.1% | $357,000 |
| 08247 | 1 | 0.1% | $4,516,500 | |
| 08260 | Wildwood Crest | 1 | 0.1% | $225,400 |
| 08270 | Woodbine | 1 | 0.1% | $215,800 |
Top 8 of 8 ZIP codes with filings.
Non-resident owner analysis
Most filings (100%) involve owner-occupied properties. The relatively low absentee rate suggests distress is primarily hitting homeowners, not institutional investors.
| Case type | Total filings | Non-resident % |
|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 1222 | 0.0% |
| Estate | 15 | 0.0% |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0.0% |
Non-resident = owner's mailing address differs from the property address. Could indicate out-of-state landlords, inherited estates, second homes, or in-transition properties.
Target absentee and distressed owners directly
Every lead includes the owner's contact information and property details. Exclusive to one subscriber per county.
Distress composition and shifts
Tax Sale, Estate share is rising. Foreclosure share is declining. Low diversity — distress is dominated by one or two case types, suggesting a concentrated driver.
| Case type | Recent share | Earlier share | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 77.6% | 100.0% | -22.4pp (falling) |
| Tax Sale | 10.3% | 0.0% | +10.3pp (rising) |
| Estate | 10.3% | 0.0% | +10.3pp (rising) |
| Divorce | 1.7% | 0.0% | +1.7pp |
Distress diversity score: 1.06 (Shannon entropy; higher = more diverse distress sources). "Recent" = last 2 complete months; "Earlier" = all prior months.
Property Value Profile
The median assessed value of properties in court filings is $225,900. Estate filings involve the highest-value properties (median $303,000), while Tax Sale filings trend lower (median $148,000). The largest segment (51.9%) falls in the $100K - $250K range.
| Value range | Properties | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $100K | 10 | 4.9% |
| $100K - $250K | 107 | 51.9% |
| $250K - $500K | 57 | 27.7% |
| $500K - $1M | 19 | 9.2% |
| Over $1M | 13 | 6.3% |
Value breakdown by case type
| Case type | Median value | Avg value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | $228,400 | $382,397 | 181 |
| Estate | $303,000 | $629,729 | 14 |
| Tax Sale | $148,000 | $151,822 | 9 |
Based on county assessor records for 206 properties with court filings (16.5% of total filings). Values are tax-assessed amounts, not market listing prices.
Investment Opportunity Score by ZIP Code
Across 4 ZIP codes with sufficient court filing data, ZIP 08204 (Cape May) ranks highest with an investment opportunity score of 60/100, driven by high filing volume (7 cases).
| Rank | ZIP Code | Area | Score | Filings | Avg Value | Absentee % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 08204 | Cape May |
60
|
7 | — | 0% |
| #2 | 08214 | Dennis Township |
58
|
6 | — | 0% |
| #3 | 08226 | Ocean City |
58
|
6 | — | 0% |
| #4 | 08210 | Cape May Court House |
40
|
5 | — | 0% |
How the score is calculated
The Investment Opportunity Score combines four dimensions from verified court filing data:
- Filing volume (35%): More filings = more potential deals in the area
- Property value (25%): Higher assessed values = larger potential deal sizes
- Absentee owner rate (25%): Absentee owners are more likely to sell at a discount
- Case type diversity (15%): Multiple case types = broader opportunity set
Each dimension is normalized to a 0–100 scale across all scored ZIPs, then weighted and combined. A score of 100 means that ZIP ranks highest across all dimensions. Scores should be compared within the same county or state, not across different markets.
Based on 1249 court filings across 4 ZIP codes. ZIPs with fewer than 3 filings are excluded. Property values from county assessor records. Absentee status from property ownership verification.
Distress Capital Analysis
$80,987,300 in assessed property value is currently tied up in 206 court-filed properties. Foreclosure filings represent the largest capital pool ($69,213,800 across 181 properties).
Capital at Risk by Filing Type
| Filing Type | Total Value | Properties | Avg Value | High Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | $69,213,800 | 181 | $382,397 | -- |
| Estate | $8,816,200 | 14 | $629,729 | -- |
| Tax Sale | $1,366,400 | 9 | $151,822 | -- |
Based on 206 properties with assessor valuations (16.5% of 1249 total filings). Values are county assessor estimates. Equity calculated from estimated value vs outstanding mortgage balance where available.
Market Absorption & Turnover Analysis
1,249 court filings tracked with 0 resolved (0.0% absorption rate). The court system is accumulating cases faster than they resolve, creating a growing backlog of 1,249 active cases.
| Month | New Filings | Resolved | Net | Inflow | Absorption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2020 | 29 | 0 | +29 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2020 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2020 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| May 2020 | 9 | 0 | +9 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2020 | 8 | 0 | +8 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2020 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2020 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2020 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2020 | 8 | 0 | +8 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2020 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2020 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2021 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2021 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2021 | 13 | 0 | +13 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2021 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| May 2021 | 13 | 0 | +13 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2021 | 10 | 0 | +10 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2021 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2021 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2021 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2021 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2021 | 8 | 0 | +8 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2021 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2022 | 9 | 0 | +9 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2022 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2022 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2022 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| May 2022 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2022 | 20 | 0 | +20 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2022 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2022 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2022 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2022 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2022 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2022 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2023 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2023 | 13 | 0 | +13 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2023 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2023 | 25 | 0 | +25 | 0.0% | |
| May 2023 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2023 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2023 | 12 | 0 | +12 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2023 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2023 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2023 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2023 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2023 | 11 | 0 | +11 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2024 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2024 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2024 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2024 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| May 2024 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2024 | 13 | 0 | +13 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2024 | 13 | 0 | +13 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2024 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2024 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2024 | 10 | 0 | +10 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2024 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2024 | 23 | 0 | +23 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2025 | 20 | 0 | +20 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2025 | 10 | 0 | +10 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2025 | 25 | 0 | +25 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2025 | 18 | 0 | +18 | 0.0% | |
| May 2025 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2025 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2025 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Aug 2025 | 16 | 0 | +16 | 0.0% | |
| Sep 2025 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| Oct 2025 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 0.0% | |
| Nov 2025 | 8 | 0 | +8 | 0.0% | |
| Dec 2025 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Jan 2026 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 0.0% | |
| Feb 2026 | 15 | 0 | +15 | 0.0% | |
| Mar 2026 | 28 | 0 | +28 | 0.0% | |
| Apr 2026 | 21 | 0 | +21 | 0.0% | |
| May 2026 | 19 | 0 | +19 | 0.0% | |
| Jun 2026 | 39 | 0 | +39 | 0.0% | |
| Jul 2026 | 24 | 0 | +24 | 0.0% |
Resolution by Case Type
| Case Type | Filed | Resolved | Absorption | Avg Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 1222 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Estate | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | n/a |
Absorption rate measures the percentage of filed cases that have reached a terminal resolution (judgment, dismissal, settlement, or sale). A low absorption rate indicates a growing backlog of active cases in the court system. Resolution timing based on 0 resolved cases out of 1249 total filings.
Property Type Distribution
81.2% of distressed properties are classified as Agricultural, followed by Commercial (18.8%).
| Property type | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural | 13 | 81.2% | |
| Commercial | 3 | 18.8% |
Property type by case type
| Case type | Dominant property type | Share | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | Agricultural | 80.0% | 15 |
Property classifications from county assessor records for 16 properties (1.3% of total filings). Categories normalized from assessor codes.
Case Aging & Stall Analysis
996 cases (79.7%) have been active for over a year without resolution. 42 filings in the last <30 days represent fresh opportunities.
| Age | Total | Resolved | Still active | Resolution rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <30 days | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% |
| 30-90 days | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0.0% |
| 3-6 months | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0.0% |
| 6-12 months | 102 | 0 | 102 | 0.0% |
| 1-2 years | 189 | 0 | 189 | 0.0% |
| 2+ years | 807 | 0 | 807 | 0.0% |
Resolution speed by case type
| Case type | Total | Resolved | Rate | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 1,222 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Estate | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Tax Sale | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Case aging computed from filing date to present for unresolved cases. Resolution classified from court docket entries (judgments, settlements, dismissals, sheriff sales). Cases with a resolution event are removed from the stall count.
Property Age & Distress Profile
185 filings (14.8% of scope) have year-built data. Pre-1960 properties are most common (44%).
| Construction era | Filings | Share | Avg value | Median days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-1960 | 81 | 43.8% | $295,036 | — |
| 1960–1979 | 49 | 26.5% | $220,980 | — |
| 1980–1999 | 36 | 19.5% | $1,054,043 | — |
| 2000+ | 19 | 10.3% | $275,100 | — |
Value trend: 2000+ properties average $275,100 — 0.93x the value of Pre-1960 stock ($295,036).
Top case types by construction era
Construction year sourced from county tax assessor records. Value is assessed value from the most recent available tax assessment. Resolution timing based on court docket events.
Municipality filing concentration in Cape May County
Court filings in Cape May County span 15 municipalities. Middle Township leads with 94 filings (21.5% of total), predominantly Foreclosure (100.0%). Filing activity is geographically concentrated — the top 3 municipalities account for 52% of all filings.
| Municipality | Filings | Share | Top case type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle Township | 94 | 21.5% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Lower Township | 80 | 18.3% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Wildwood | 51 | 11.7% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Ocean City | 49 | 11.2% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Upper Township | 36 | 8.2% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| North Wildwood | 31 | 7.1% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Dennis | 19 | 4.3% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Sea Isle City | 17 | 3.9% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Wildwood Crest | 16 | 3.7% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Woodbine | 15 | 3.4% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| West Wildwood | 10 | 2.3% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Avalon | 9 | 2.1% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Cape May | 6 | 1.4% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| West Cape May | 3 | 0.7% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
| Stone Harbor | 1 | 0.2% | Foreclosure (100.0%) |
Top 15 of 15 municipalities with court filings. Data from 437 filings (35% of total). Municipality names from county assessor records.
Quarterly Filing Volume Trends
Filing trends across 18 comparable quarters show 940 tracked filings in Cape May County. Most recent quarter (2026 Q2: 79) was rising vs prior (2026 Q1: 60, +31.7%).
| Quarter | Total | Foreclosure | Estate | Tax Sale | Divorce |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Q1 | 42 | 42 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2022 Q2 | 56 | 56 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2022 Q3 | 47 | 47 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2022 Q4 | 61 | 61 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2023 Q1 | 50 | 50 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2023 Q2 | 72 | 72 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2023 Q3 | 46 | 46 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2023 Q4 | 38 | 38 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q1 | 54 | 54 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q2 | 48 | 48 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q3 | 43 | 43 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q4 | 52 | 52 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2025 Q1 | 55 | 55 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2025 Q2 | 39 | 39 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2025 Q3 | 53 | 53 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2025 Q4 | 45 | 45 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2026 Q1 | 60 | 60 (100.0%) | — | — | — |
| 2026 Q2 | 79 | 66 (83.5%) | 6 (7.6%) | 6 (7.6%) | 1 (1.3%) |
Only comparable quarters shown (collection ramp-up periods excluded). Filing dates from verified court records. Current partial quarter excluded from trend calculations.
Property Value Distribution
The median property value in distressed filings is $220,450, with the largest concentration (25.0%) in the $100K–$150K range.
| Price range | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $50K | 2 | 7.1% | |
| $100K–$150K | 7 | 25.0% | |
| $150K–$200K | 4 | 14.3% | |
| $200K–$300K | 5 | 17.9% | |
| $300K–$500K | 6 | 21.4% | |
| $500K+ | 4 | 14.3% |
Value by case type
| Case type | Median value | Average value | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estate | $303,000 | $656,053 | 13 |
Assessed property values from county assessor records for 28 properties (2.2% of total filings). Values reflect tax-assessed amounts, not market price.
Ownership Duration Before Filing
The median ownership duration before a court filing is 11.2 years, with 54.5% of owners holding the property 10+ years (a strong equity signal for investors). Estate cases show the longest tenure (14.5 yr median) vs. Foreclosure (11.2 yr).
| Ownership period | Count | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2 years | 6 | 4.5% | |
| 2–5 years | 25 | 18.9% | |
| 5–10 years | 29 | 22.0% | |
| 10–20 years | 35 | 26.5% | |
| 20+ years | 37 | 28.0% |
Tenure by case type
| Case type | Median tenure | Average tenure | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 11.2 yr | 14.6 yr | 107 |
| Estate | 14.5 yr | 18.9 yr | 14 |
Duration calculated from last recorded property sale to court filing date for 132 properties (10.6% of total filings). Longer ownership often correlates with higher equity.
Repeat litigation patterns in Cape May County
Of 910 unique property owners in court filings, 144 (15.8%) appear in multiple cases, including 58 with 3 or more filings. The most active repeat filer has 18 cases spanning 76 months. Foreclosure cases have the highest repeat rate at 16.0%.
Repeat rate by case type
| Case type | Repeat owners | Total owners | Repeat rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 142 | 888 | 16.0% |
Analysis based on 910 unique owner names across court filings. Repeat filers are property owners appearing in 2 or more distinct cases.
Land vs improvement value composition
Across 183 properties with assessed value breakdowns, the median land share is 55.2% (median land value $121,200, median improvement value $107,500). 112 properties (61.2%) are land-dominant (50%+ land value) — potential teardown or vacant-lot targets. Estate cases skew most land-heavy (median 67.7%) while Foreclosure skews most improvement-heavy (54.3%).
Land share distribution
| Land share bracket | Properties | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10% | 1 | 0.5% |
| 10–20% | 4 | 2.2% |
| 20–30% | 3 | 1.6% |
| 30–50% | 63 | 34.4% |
| 50–70% | 74 | 40.4% |
| Over 70% | 38 | 20.8% |
Land share by case type
| Case type | Filings | Median land % |
|---|---|---|
| Foreclosure | 160 | 54.3% |
| Estate | 13 | 67.7% |
Analysis of 183 properties (14.7% of filings) with assessed land and improvement value breakdowns.
Why these filings are invisible on most public foreclosure sites
The largest public foreclosure-aggregator interfaces surface only post-auction bank-owned properties in New Jersey. Pre-foreclosure court filings are not visible to their non-paying users. Keystone tracks the court filing the day it hits the docket, weeks or months before any property reaches the auction stage those aggregators surface.
Methodology and full audit: Court-vs-aggregator coverage gap report.
Methodology and data sources
- Court filings are collected directly from Cape May County court records, which are public information.
- This dataset is the court-filing archive as collected from the county docket. The owner-of-record match and the entity-owner screen are applied to delivered leads, not to these filing counts.
- Property value figures come from third-party enrichment (16% coverage on this dataset).
- Individual case data, defendant names, and property addresses are not published. Reports show aggregated statistics only.
- The methodology page at /reports/methodology documents data sources, sample sizes, and known limitations in detail.
- This report was generated 2026-07-16 from the live database. Numbers reflect the dataset at that moment.
Top cities for filings within Cape May County
Where filings concentrate inside Cape May County, by parsed property city or township.
| City / Township | Filings | Share (of city-parsed filings) |
|---|---|---|
| Cape May | 9 | 45.0% |
| Ocean City | 4 | 20.0% |
| Cape May Court House | 2 | 10.0% |
| Dennis Township | 2 | 10.0% |
| Marmora | 1 | 5.0% |
Share is computed against filings with a parsed property city (not against total Cape May County filings — addresses missing the city portion are excluded from the denominator). Top 5 shown; smaller cities aggregate into the long tail.
Related New Jersey guides
Get the underlying Cape May County filings
Subscribe to Cape May County on Keystone Court Data and get day-of-filing access to every new property-related case as it hits the docket. One subscriber per county. 7-day free trial.
View Cape May County availabilityWant updates when new reports publish? Subscribe to the research RSS feed or follow keystonecourtdata.com.
Cite: Keystone Court Data, "Cape May County New Jersey Court Filings Intelligence," 2026-07-16, https://keystonecourtdata.com/reports/cape-may-nj-court-filings-intelligence · Download data (CSV)